Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1208–1229 | Cite as

“The Western Feminists Want to Make Us Gay”: Nationalism, Heteronormativity, and Violence Against Women in Bulgaria in Times of “Anti-gender Campaigns”

  • Shaban DarakchiEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The abolishment of women’s and LGBTQ rights has become one of the main goals of the so-called “anti-gender campaigns” emerging on a global scale. This study investigates discourses and notions that reject the concepts of “gender” and “gender-based violence” in times of “anti-gender campaigns” in Bulgaria. Based on discourse analysis and data from social media comments, the study demonstrates how “gender politics of fear” in Bulgaria have been included in the heteronormative, political, religious, nationalistic, and anti-feminist discourses and how gender and LGBTQ equality policies are identified as a threat to the traditional Bulgarian values. Engaging with the concept of hegemonic femininity, the analysis identifies four main types of notions among women opposing women’s rights policies and demonstrates how the socialist past of Bulgaria has strengthened these beliefs. Finally, the analysis discusses some possible directions towards a constructive and evidence-based dialogue in times of “anti-gender campaigns”, taking into account the strategic “delegitimization” of gender studies globally and the potential of the progressive and feminist religious scholarship and “contextual reasoning”.

Keywords

Anti-gender campaigns Women’s/LGBTQ rights Gender-based violence Politics of fear Istanbul Convention Eastern Europe 

Notes

Funding

The theoretical framework and part of the empirical research of this study were completed during my visiting fellowships at Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki and the Department of Anthropology, University of Latvia (Latvian Governmental Scholarship).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author confirms that there is no conflict of interest regarding this study.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.

References

  1. Bilić, B., & Biliâc, B. (2016). LGBT activism and Europeanisation in the post-Yugoslav space. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Case, M. A. (2016). The role of the Popes in the invention of complementarity and the anathematization of gender. Religion and Gender, 6(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Lange, S. L., & Mügge, L. M. (2015). Gender and right-wing populism in the low countries: Ideological variations across parties and time. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farris, S. R. (2017). In the name of women s rights: The rise of femonationalism. Duke, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fassin, E. (2016). Gender and the problem of universals: Catholic mobilizations and sexual democracy in France. Religion and Gender, 6(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  7. Geva, D. (2018). Daughter, Mother, Captain: Marine Le Pen, gender, and populism in the French National Front. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graff, A. (2014). Report from the gender trenches: War against “genderism” in Poland. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2018). Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The anti-colonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism. Signs, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grans, L. (2018). The Istanbul convention and the positive obligation to prevent violence. Human Rights Law Review, 18(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grujić, M. (2009). Community and the popular: Women, nation and turbo-folk in post-Yugoslav Serbia. Ph.D. dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
  12. Hodžič, A., & Bijelić, N. (2014). Neo-conservative threats to sexual and reproductive health & rights in the European Union. Zagreb: CESI.Google Scholar
  13. Hodžić, A., & Štulhofer, A. (2017). Embryo, teddy bear-centaur, and the constitution: Mobilizations against ‘gender ideology’ and sexual permissiveness in Croatia. In R. Kuhar & D. Patternote (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Im, E. O., & Chee, W. (2006). An online forum as a qualitative research method: Practical issues. Nursing Research, 55(4), 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jovanovski, N., & Tyler, M. (2018). “Bitch, you got what you deserved!”: Violation and violence in sex buyer reviews of legal brothels. Violence Against Women, 24(16), 1887–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King, L. (2002). Demographic trends, pronatalism, and nationalist ideologies in the late twentieth century. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Köttig, M., Bitzan, R., & Pető, A. (Eds.). (2017). Gender and far right politics in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Kováts, E. (2018). Questioning consensuses: Right-wing populism, anti-populism, and the threat of ‘gender ideology’. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 528–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kováts, E., & Põim, M. (Eds.). (2015). Gender as symbolic glue: The position and role of conservative and far right parties in the anti-gender mobilization in Europe. Foundation for European Progressive Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Krizsan, A., & Popa, R. M. (2014). Frames in contestation: Gendering domestic violence policies in five Central and Eastern European Countries. Violence Against Women, 20(7), 758–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuby, G. (2016). The global revolution. Destruction of freedom in the name of freedom. Kettering: Angelico Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhar, R. (2015). Playing with science: Sexual citizenship and the Roman Catholic Church counter-narratives in Slovenia and Croatia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 49(1), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Limited: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhar, R., & Zobec, A. (2017). The anti-gender movement in Europe and the educational process in public schools. CEPS Journal, 7(2), 29–46.Google Scholar
  25. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2006). Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a feminist reading? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer, S., & Sauer, B. (2017). "Gender ideology" in Austria: Coalitions around an empty signifier. In R. Kuhar & D. Paternotte (Eds.), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick et al. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage publication.Google Scholar
  28. Michalski, J. H. (2004). Making sociological sense out of trends in intimate Partnera violence: The social structure of violence against women. Violence against women, 10(6), 652–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paternotte, D. (2015). Blessing the crowds: Catholic mobilisations against gender in Europe. In H. Sabine & V. Paula-Irene (Eds.), Anti-genderismus: Sexualität und geschlecht als schauplätze aktueller politischer auseinandersetzungen. Bielefeld, DE: Transcript.Google Scholar
  30. Paternotte, D., Case, M. A., & Bracke, S. (2016). The sin of turning away from reality: An interview with Father Krzysztof Charamsa. Religion and Gender, 6(2), 226–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paternotte, D., & Kuhar, R. (2018). Disentangling and locating the “global right”: Anti-gender campaigns in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peto, A. (2016). How are anti-gender movements changing gender studies as a profession. Religion and Gender, 6(2), 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rippeyoung, P. L. (2007). When women are right: The influence of gender, work and values on European far-right party support. International feminist journal of politics, 9(3), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robcis, C. (2012). The law of kinship: Anthropology, psychoanalysis and the family in France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sager, M., & Mulinari, D. (2018). Safety for whom? Exploring femonationalism and care-racism in Sweden. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spasova, L. (2019). Hate crimes. Mechanisms for normalization of socially induced hatred. Sofia: Avangard Prima.Google Scholar
  39. Stiftung, H. B. (2015). Anti-gender movements on the rise? Strategising for gender equality in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved May 8, 2019, from https://www.boell.de/en/2015/04/21/anti-gender-movements-rise.
  40. Trottier, D., & Fuchs, C. (Eds.). (2014). Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and Youtube (Vol. 16). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Verloo, M., & Paternotte, D. (2018). The feminist project under threat in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wasileski, G., & Miller, S. L. (2010). Review Essay: The elephants in the room: Ethnicity and violence against women in post-communist Slovakia. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Societies and KnowledgeBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations