Advertisement

There is Condom-Less Sex But There are Glow-in-the-Dark Condoms Too: Girls Debating Safe Sex

  • Joanne CassarEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The study examines multimodal, nonverbal communication on birth control, teenage pregnancy and abortion among a number of female students who expressed themselves through anonymous writings on toilet doors of their educational institution in Malta. Their diverse perspectives on these themes were also related to contraception and sexually acquired infections and how these compromise sexual pleasure in heteronormative relations. Data is comprised of digital photographs of toilet graffiti. The study draws on discourse analysis to understand girls’ thinking about safe sex and surrounding issues according to the discursive formations present in their writings. This approach affirms that written texts are ascribed meanings according to social and cultural contexts in which they occur. Their debates on how lack of contraceptive use might materialize the pregnant and/or the infected body are culturally mediated through a number of discourses surrounding safe sex. The study demonstrates that the girls’ articulations affirm the complexities surrounding their described heterosexual relationships in relation to the un/condomised bodies of the other. Condom-less sex and glow-in-the-dark condoms use are considered two liminal states that between them hold a discursive continuum on issues about sexual pleasure. By debating safe sex students could move across this continuum; not necessarily in a linear way but backwards and forwards according to culturally prescribed dictates on safe sex.

Keywords

Safe sex Graffiti Discourse Contraception Sexualities Girls’ writings 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The study makes use of secondary data composed of anonymous graffiti writings. Due to the anonymity of the writings, signed and informed consent from the writers to publish them was not possible. Institutional consent has been granted.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Ethical clearance from the University of Malta Research Ethics Committee was granted to conduct the research. All procedures performed in studies involving secondary data were in accordance with the ethical standards of this institutional research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by the Cassar.

References

  1. Alldred, P., & David, M. E. (2007). Get real about sex: The politics and practice of sex education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2008). ‘They think you shouldn’t be having sex anyway’: Young people’s suggestions for improving sexuality education content. Sexualities: Studies in Culture and Society, 11(5), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, L. (2011a). ‘Picture this’: using photo-methods in research on sexualities and schooling. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, L. (2011b). Young people and sexuality education: Rethinking key debates. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, L. (2015). Picturing queer at school. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(4), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen, L., & Carmody, M. (2012). ‘Pleasure has no passport’: Re-visiting the potential of pleasure in sexuality education. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 12, 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauman, L. J., Karasz, A., & Hamilton, A. (2007). Understanding failure of condom use intention among adolescents completing an intensive preventive intervention. The Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugeja, R. (2010). Assessing young people’s learning needs related to sexuality and relationships on the Maltese Islands. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. School of Education, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  9. Camilleri, S. (2013). Guidelines on sexuality and relationships education in Maltese schools. Malta: Directorate for Quality and Standards.Google Scholar
  10. Cassar, J. (2007). Unveiling desires: Adolescents’ hidden graffiti about sexualities and romantic relationships in schooled settings. International Journal of the Humanities, 5(4), 179–183.Google Scholar
  11. Cassar, J. (2009). Being a lesbian is no sin: Religion, sexuality and education in the lives of female students. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 14(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
  12. Cassar, J. (2013). How can I lose my shyness? The exploration of self-knowledge through peer-mediated articulations. In A. Azzopardi (Ed.), Youth responding to lives: An international handbook (pp. 245–258). London: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassar, J. (2014). You could be surprised how sweet and caring some guys are: Girls’ writings about sexuality, romance and conflict. In G. Frerks, A. Ypeij, & R. König (Eds.), Gender and conflict: Embodiments, discourses and symbolic practices (pp. 193–215). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Cassar, J. (2015). Sex and secrecies: An exploration of students’ conceptualizations of heteronormativity. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(4), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassar, J. (2017). Girls debating penises, orgasms, masturbation and pornography. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 17(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassar, J. (2018a). Exploring spaces for ‘Love’ in sexuality education curricula across the European Union. In R. A. Benavides Torres, D. J. Onofre-Rodríguez, M. A. Marquez-Vega, & R. C. Barbosa-Martínez (Eds.), Sex education: Global perspectives, effective programs and socio-cultural challenges (pp. 37–60). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Cassar, J. (2018b). Ruptured dreams: Female students’ talk about boys as past ‘lovers’. International Academic Forum Journal of Education, 6(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  18. Cassar, J., & Cremona, G. (2017). Multimodal perspectives on school community building through Graffiti. The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies, 15(3), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cassar, J., & Grima Sultana, M. (2016). Sex is a minor thing: Parents of Gay sons negotiating the social influences of coming out. Sexuality and Culture, 20(4), 987–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cassar, J., & Grima Sultana, M. (2018). No way am I throwing you out! Adjustments in space and time for parents of gay sons. Journal of Family Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1523020.Google Scholar
  21. Cedillo, C. V., & Elston, M. M. (2017). The critique of everyday life; or, why we decided to start a new multimodal Rhetorics Journal. The Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 1(1), 6–13.Google Scholar
  22. Constitution of Malta. (1964). Retrieved April 18, 2018 from http://justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8566.
  23. Deguara, A. (2019). Sexual morality and shame among catholics whose lifestyle does not conform to church teaching. Sexuality & Culture.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09591-w.Google Scholar
  24. Dibben, A. (2015). Teenage pregnancy and motherhood in Malta: A feminist ethnography. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  25. ECEC (European Consortium for Emergency Contraception). (2015). Emergency contraception availability in Europe. Retrieved May 9, 2018 from http://www.ec-ec.org/emergency-contraception-in-europe/emergency-contraception-availability-in-europe/.
  26. Epstein, D., O’Flynn, S., & Telford, D. (2003). Silenced Sexualities in Schools and Universities. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  27. Farnia, M. (2014). A thematic analysis of graffiti on the university classroom walls—A case of Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(3), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenech, D. (2012). Divorced from political reality: The new limits of ecclesiastical power in Malta. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 101(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferris, F. S., & Banda, F. (2015). ‘Poof! a’m heppily saving the Lord…’: Multimodality and evaluative discourses in male toilet Graffiti at the University of the Western Cape. African Identities, 13(4), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (Translated by Sheridan Smith A M) New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, M., & Hearn, J. (2019). Revenge pornography and manhood acts: a discourse analysis of perpetrators’ accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harwood, M. (2015). Adopting same-sex unions in catholic Malta: Pointing the finger at ‘Europe’. South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jewitt, C. (2004). Multimodality and new communication technologies. In P. Le Vine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 184–195). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kehily, M. J. (2002). Sexuality, gender and schooling: Shifting agendas in social learning. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  36. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about Language. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lech, M. M. (2008). Editorial: Inequalities in reproductive health care in Europe. The European Journal of contraception and reproductive health care, 13, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacDonald, N. (2001). The Graffiti subculture: Youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maclure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Maltatoday. (2016). Women’s rights group goes to court to demand morning-after pill. June 16th. Retrieved from http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/66550/womens_rights_group_goes_to_court_to_demand_morningafter_pill#.Whv8R7aZNPM.
  44. Mifsud, M., Buttigieg, G. G., Savona Ventura, C., & Delicata, S. (2009). Reproductive health in Malta. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 14(4), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministry for Health, the elderly and community care. (2010). The National Sexual Health Policy for the Maltese Islands. Malta: Ministry for Health, the Elderly and Community Care.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry for Health, the Elderly and Community Care. (2013). Emergency contraception. The health promotion and disease prevention directorate. Retrieved June 15, 2018 from http://sexualhealth.gov.mt.
  47. Ministry of Education and Employment. (2012). A national curriculum framework for all. Floriana: Ministry of Education and Employment.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Health. (2012). Sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Malta: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  49. National Statistics Office. (2014). News release: International day of Families: 2014. Malta: National Statistics Office. Retrieved January 29, 2018 from http://www.nso.gov.mt.
  50. Rasmussen, M., Rofes, E., & Talburt, S. (Eds.). (2004). Youth and sexualities: Pleasure, subversion and insubordination in and out of schools. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Rosengarten, M. (2004). The challenge of HIV for feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rowsell, J., & Pahl, K. (2007). Sedimented identities in texts: Instances of practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health. (2011). The reproductive health report 2011. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 16(1), 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Times of Malta. (2017). Morning-after pill opponents file judicial protest against Medicines Authority, 17th January. Retrieved from https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20170117/local/morning-after-pill-opponents-file-judicial-protest-against-medicines.636788.
  56. Turner, V. (2009). The ritual process. New York/London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  57. Uecker, J. E., Angotti, N., & Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Going most of the way: “Technical Virginity” among American adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1200–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasudevan, L. M. (2014). Multimodal cosmopolitanism: Cultivating belonging in everyday moments with youth. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Health Organisation. (2016). Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Youth and Community StudiesUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations