Advertisement

A Gender Perspective in Initial English Language Teacher Education: An Argentinian Experience

  • Darío Luis BanegasEmail author
  • Lina Gabriela Jacovkis
  • Antonella Romiti
Original Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

In second language teacher education there is a gap in the literature concerning initial teacher preparation on gender and sexuality education. The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of a foreign language teaching module with a gender perspective on the education of a group of 30 student–teachers at an online initial English language teacher education programme in Argentina in 2018. Following an ecological approach to teacher research, data were gathered through surveys and student–teachers’ completion of coursework. Overall, the student–teachers found the experience beneficial both regarding their personal development as citizens and future teachers, in terms of their increased awareness of gender matters and their ability to produce motivating language activities anchored in wider social practices which promote gender equality and diversity. The study includes implications for initial teacher education and curriculum development.

Keywords

Teacher education Gender Sexual education Teacher research Professional practice 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Author A declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Author C declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Appleby, R. (2010). ELT, gender and international development: Myths of progress in a neo-colonial world. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariyanto, S. (2018). A portrait of gender bias in the prescribed Indonesian ELT textbook for junior high school students. Sexuality and Culture, 1, 11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9512-8.Google Scholar
  3. Bargalló, M. L., & Lavari, M. (Eds.). (2015). Educación sexual integral en la Argentina: Voces desde la escuela. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
  4. Benavides, C. (2017). EFL students’ social identities construction through gender-based short stories. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 11–21.  https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.10641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianco, M., Mariño, A., & Re, M. I. (2008). Docentes y educación sexual integral: Un papel en constante construcción. Buenos Aires: Fundación Para Estudio e Investigación de la Mujer (FEIM).Google Scholar
  6. Bobbio, S., & Papini, R. (2016). An interdisciplinary and intercultural approach to the construction of gender. In D. L. Banegas, M. López-Barrios, M. Porto, & A. Soto (Eds.), ELT as a multidisciplinary endeavour: Growing through collaboration Selected papers from the 41st FAAPI Conference (pp. 7–17). San Juan: ASJPI.Google Scholar
  7. Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brochin, C. (2019). Queering bilingual teaching in elementary schools and in bilingual teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 58(1), 80–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1536917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullock, D., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2015). Teachers research!. Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
  10. Collier, K. L., Bos, H. M. W., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2015). Understanding teachers’ responses to enactments of sexual and gender stigma at school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. (2009). Ley 26.485. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  12. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. (2010). Ley 26.618. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  13. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. (2012a). Ley 26.743. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  14. Congreso de la Nación Argentina. (2012b). Ley 26.791. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  15. Consejo Federal de Educación. (2009). Lineamientos curriculares para la educación sexual integral. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, K. A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Looking back, taking stock, moving forward: Investigating gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 381–404.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher–researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735–745.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evripidou, D. (2018). The interrelationship among sexual identity, learning, and sexualisation: Primary EFL teachers’ attitudes in Cyprus. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1062–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogia do oprimido. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
  20. Giroux, H. (1997). Escritura y pensamiento crítico en los estudios sociales. Los profesores como intelectuales: Hacia una pedagogía crítica del aprendizaje. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  21. Govender, N. N. (2019). Negotiating gender and sexual diversity in English language teaching: “Critical”-oriented educational materials designed by pre-service English teachers at a South African university. In M. López-Gopar (Ed.), International perspectives on critical pedagogies in ELT (pp. 125–150). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanks, J. (2017). Integrating research and pedagogy: An exploratory practice approach. System, 68, 38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawker, S., & Kerr, C. (2016). Doing grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 147–160). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, P. C., & Endo, H. (2016). Introducing (a)gender into foreign/second language education. In S. J. Miller (Ed.), Teaching, affirming, and recognizing trans and gender creative youth: A queer literacy framework (pp. 163–184). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mojica, C. P., & Castañeda-Peña, H. (2017). A learning experience of the gender perspective in English teaching contexts. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(1), 139–153.  https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.56209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore, A. R. (2016). Inclusion and exclusion: A case study of an English class for LGBT learners. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 86–108.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgade, G. (2006). Educación en la sexualidad desde el enfoque de género: Unaantigua deuda de la escuela. Novedades Educativas, 184, 40–44.Google Scholar
  28. Morgade, G., & Fainsod, P. (2015). Convergencias y divergencias de sentido en los talleres de educación sexual integral de la formación docente. Revista del IICE, 38, 39–62.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, C. D. (2009). Sexual identities in English language education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nguyen, H., & Yang, L. (2015). A queer learner’s identity positioning in second language classroom discourse. Classroom Discourse, 6(3), 221–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1093952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton, B. (2016). Identity and language learning: Back to the future. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 475–479.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norton, B., & Pavlenko, A. (2004). Addressing gender in the ESL/EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 504–514.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3588351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2012). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–426.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ollis, D., Harrison, L., & Maharaj, C. (2013). Sexuality education matters: Preparing pre-service teachers to teach sexuality education. Burwood: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  35. Pakuła, Ł., Pawelczyk, J., & Sunderland, J. (2015). Gender and sexuality in English language education: Focus on Poland. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  36. Payne, S. (2016). Grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 119–146). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Potenza, E., & Vilalta, C. (2016). Educación sexual integral y educación visual en el nivel inicial. Paper presented at the III Jornadas de Formación Docente Desafíos y tensiones de la formación docente en los actuales escenarios. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.Google Scholar
  38. Premat, L., & Tortone, N. (2018). Redefining ESP teaching practice: Reading comprehension from a gender perspective. In D. L. Banegas, M. López-Barrios, M. Porto, & M. Waigandt (Eds.), Adapting to meet diverse needs in ELT: Selected Papers from the 43rd FAAPI Conference (pp. 68–76). Río Gallegos: APISC.Google Scholar
  39. Robinson, K. H., & Ferfolja, T. (2008). Playing it up, playing it down, playing it safe: Queering teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 846–858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rocha Pessoa, R. R., & de Urzêda Freitas, M. T. (2012). Challenges in critical language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 753–776.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.46.Google Scholar
  41. Román, C. (2013). ESI (Educación Sexual Integral): Del marco teórico a la puesta en práctica por estudiantes de la formación docente. Paper presented at the VII Jornadas Nacionales sobre la Formación del Profesorado. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.Google Scholar
  42. Sauntson, H. (2018). Language, sexuality and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siderac, S. (2015). Teacher training and comprehensive sexuality education at Unlpam. Entramados: Educación y Sociedad, 2(2), 75–81.Google Scholar
  44. Stelma, J., & Fay, R. (2014). Intentionality and developing researcher competence on a UK master’s course: An ecological perspective on research education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 517–533.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vavrus, M. (2009). Sexuality, schooling, and teacher identity formation: A critical pedagogy for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 383–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Villacañas de Castro, L. S., Cano Bodi, V., & Hortelano Montejano, A. (2018). Teaching English as a non-imperial language in an underprivileged public school in Spain. TESOL Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WarwickWarwickUK
  2. 2.IFDC Lenguas Vivas Bariloche (Argentina)Río NegroArgentina
  3. 3.EsquelArgentina
  4. 4.Universidad Nacional de General SarmientoBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations