Advertisement

Online Dating in Singapore: The Desire to Have Children

  • Voon Chin Phua
  • Keyana P. Moody
Original Paper

Abstract

Low fertility has been a concern in Singapore. While there are studies examining the causes, few studies have used online dating services as a source of data to examine the desire of Singaporeans to have children. Yet, research on mate and date selection using online personals is prolific, arguing that online personals are a valuable source of information for social analysis. Using a data set that was collected in 2007 and in 2015 from a website for Singapore online dating, we examined the factors influencing whether Singaporeans expressed wanting children in their personals. We find that preference for a committed relationship is the strongest predictor for the desire to have children. The age effects are as expected. Women are less likely to express they want children in these personals.

Keywords

Singapore Fertility Online dating Wanting children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Desirée Ciambrone for her insightful comments and editorial assistance. We would also like to thank Raichl Davenport, Li Fong Chen and Ambika Kirkland for their assistance with data entry.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Bartoş, S. E., Phua, V. C., & Avery, E. (2009). Differences in Romanian men’s online personals by sexualities. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 17, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Call, L. L., Sheffield, R., Trail, E., Yoshida, K., & Hill, E. Jeffrey. (2008). Singapore’s falling fertility: Exploring the influence of the work-family interface. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 34, 91–113.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H., & Tang, D. (2007). Decomposing filial piety into filial attitudes and filial enactments. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coombs, L. C., & Sun, T.-H. (1981). Familial values in a developing society: A decade of change in Taiwan. Social Forces, 59, 1229–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (1991). Bequests, filial attention and fertility. Economica, 58, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Sousa, C. L., Otta, E., & de Oliveira, S. J. (2002). Sex differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, F. M. (2006). Filial piety, patrilineality, and China’s one-child policy. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 366–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Family Policy Unit. (2005). State of the family in Singapore. Singapore: Ministry of Community Development.Google Scholar
  9. Galovan, A. M., Feistman, R. E., Stowe, J. D., & Hill, E. Jeffrey. (2015). Achieving desired family size in dual-working households: Work and family influences among Singaporean couples. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 1377–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodkind, D. (1996). Chinese lunar birth timing in Singapore: New concerns for child quality amidst multicultural modernity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 784–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Singapore. (Media Release) (2009a). SDU and SDS to come together as one. Available at: http://www.news.gov.sg/public/sgpc/en/media_releases/agencies/mcys/press_release/P-20090128-1.html. Accessed 29 September 2009.
  12. Government of Singapore. (Media Release) (2009b). SDU-SDS. Available at: http://app.mcys.gov.sg/web/faml_promomarry_sdu.asp. Accessed 29 September 2009.
  13. Grice, K., & Drakakis-Smith, D. (1985). The role of the state in shaping development: Two decades of growth in Singapore. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 10, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groom, C. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2005). The language of love: Sex, sexual orientation, and language use in online personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 52, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, G. (2004). Not ‘when to marry’ but ‘whether to marry’: The changing context of marriage decisions in East and Southeast Asia. In G. W. Jones & K. Ramdas (Eds.), (Un)tying the Knot: Asian Trends 2 (pp. 3–56). Singapore: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  16. Kaufman, G., & Phua, V. C. (2003). Is ageism alive in date selection among men? Age requests among gay and straight men in internet personal ads. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 11, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keng, K. A., Tambyah, S. K., Tan, S. J., & Jung, K. (2004). Understanding Singaporeans: Values, lifestyles, aspirations and consumption behaviors. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, H. L. (2008). National Day Rally 2008 speech at NUS-UCC on 17 August 2008. Available at: http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/view-html?filename=2008081704.htm. Accessed 27 April 2009.
  19. Lee, H. L. (2015). National Day Rally 2015 speech at the Institute of Technical Education College on 23 August 2015. Available at: http://www.pmo.gov.sg/national-day-rally-2015. Accessed 26 December 2017.
  20. Lee, J., & Paik, M. (2006). Sex preferences and fertility in South Korea during the year of the horse. Demography, 43, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lester, N. A., & Goggin, M. D. (1999). “Extra! Extra! Read all about it!” Constructions of heterosexual black male identities in the personals. Social Identities, 5, 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loveawake.com. (2009). Available at: http://www.loveawake.com/free-online-dating/Singapore-dating-service.html. Accessed 29 September 2009.
  23. LoveByte.org.sg. (2009). LoveByte’s Mission. Available at: http://www.lovebyte.org.sg/web/host_p_1main.asp. Accessed 29 September 2009.
  24. Lunsing, W. (1995). Japanese gay magazines and marriage advertisements. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 3, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyons-Lee, L. (1998). The ‘graduate woman’ phenomenon: Changing constructions of the family in Singapore. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 13, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy, D. (2002). Need a mate? In Singapore, ask the government. The Christian Science Monitor (July 16 edition). Available at: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0716/p01s02-woap.html. Accessed 25 September 2009.
  27. Pawlowsi, B., & Koziel, S. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pei-Chun, K., & Hank, K. (2014). Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China and Korea: Findings from CHARLS and KLoSA. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 69(4), 646–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phua, V. C. (2002). Sex and sexuality in men’s personal advertisements. Men and Masculinities, 5, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phua, V. C. (2007). Contesting and maintaining hegemonic masculinities: Gay Asian American men in mate selection. Sex Roles, 57, 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phua, V. C., Hopper, J., & Vazquez, O. (2002). Men’s concerns with sex and health in personal advertisements. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 4, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phua, V. C., & Kaufman, G. (2003). The crossroads of race and sexuality: Date selection among men. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 981–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phua, V. C., & Kaufman, G. (2008). Grandparenting responsibility among elderly Asian Americans: The effects of householder status, ethnicity and immigration. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phua, V. C., & Loh, J. (2008). Filial piety and intergenerational coresidence: The case of Chinese Singaporeans. Asian Journal of Social Science, 36, 659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phua, V. C., Sosa, C. J., & Aloisi, K. (2018). Males prefer younger females: Age preference among online daters in the Dominican Republic. Sexuality and Culture, 22(1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quah, S. R. (1994). Family in Singapore: Sociological perspectives. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Salaff, J. W. (1976). Working daughters in the Hong Kong Chinese family: Female filial piety or a transformation in the family power structure? Journal of Social History, 9, 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singaporecupid.com. (2007). Available at: http://www.singaporecupid.com/index. Accessed 29 September 2007.
  39. SingaporeLoveLinks.com. (2009). Available at: http://www.singaporelovelinks.com/. Accessed 29 September 2009.
  40. Straughan, P. (2004). The power of work in the family. Innovation, 5, 48–49.Google Scholar
  41. Tambyah, S. K., Tan, S. J., & Keng, K. A. (2009). The quality of life in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 92, 337–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, S., & Rosenblatt, P. C. (2008). Confucian family values and childless couples in South Korea. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeh, Stephen H. K. (1968). Love and courtship among Singapore Chinese: A study in social change. South-East Asian Journal of Social Science, 1, 25–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gettysburg CollegeGettysburgUSA

Personalised recommendations