Advertisement

Sexuality as Failure: Psychoanalytic Concepts, Cultural Perspectives

  • Insa Härtel
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

This contribution focuses on the ways in which sexuality is negotiated in western societies today, ensuing from two cultural examples:
  • In November 2017, within the context of the #MeToo campaign, a British mother urged for the banning of the fairy tale “Sleeping Beauty” from elementary school books, stating that it promotes “inappropriate” sexual behavior.

  • The article headlined “Voll Porno” (All Porn), published 2007 in the weekly German magazine, stern, can be seen in the context of the so-called “pornographization”. The piece laments that some children “no longer learn what love is”.

This contribution argues that both of these morally laden discourses “fail” themselves. Contrary to their own agenda, the way in which their content and messages are relayed appears to, in and of itself, actually perpetrate what they are negatively evaluating rather than exclude it: namely, a victimization or fetishization of endangered white innocence and a transgression of limits, respectively. In the context of subsequent theoretical considerations, some psychoanalytic reflections about sexuality’s confusing, “transboundary” aspects are given. Here the question is: Isn’t sexuality always a form of “failure”? Overall, shown through selected cultural productions, this contribution examines the central question: What is missing in today’s cultural concepts of sexuality?

Keywords

Sexuality #MeToo Sexual consent Victimization Pornographization Psychoanalysis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

References

  1. Basile, G. (1634). Sun, Moon, and Talia, https://www.pitt.edu/~dash/type0410.html#basile. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  2. Bersani, L. (1988). Is the rectum a grave? In D. Crimp (Ed.), Aids. Cultural analysis/cultural activism (pp. 197–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bersani, L. (1990). The culture of redemption. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfen, E. (1994). Nur über ihre Leiche: Tod, Weiblichkeit und Ästhetik. Munich: Verlag Antje Kunstmann.Google Scholar
  6. Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2005). Einleitung: Der Blick auf das Kind – gilt der Gesellschaft. In D. Bühler-Niederberger (Ed.), Macht der Unschuld. Das Kind als Chiffre. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chassé, K. A. (2010). Unterschichten in Deutschland. Materialien zu einer kritischen Debatte. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Dean, T. (2000). Beyond sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Flaßpöhler, S. (2010). Porn Identities. Über die performative Kraft des pornografischen Films. In T. Benkel & F. Akalin (Eds.), Soziale Dimensionen der Sexualität (pp. 339–359). Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1912d). Über die allgemeinste Erniedrigung des Liebeslebens. In A. Freud, E. Bibring, W. Hoffer, E. Kris, & O. Isakower (Eds.), G.W. Bd. VIII (pp. 78–91). Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1914c). Zur Einführung in den Narzißmus. In A. Freud, E. Bibring, W. Hoffer, E. Kris, & O. Isakower (Eds.), G.W. Bd. X (pp. 137–170). Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Giroux, H. A. (2000). Stealing innocence: Corporate culture’s war on children. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanske, P. (2010). Zwischen Pornografie und Prüderie. Anmerkungen zu einer nur scheinbar widersprüchlichen Konstellation der Gegenwart. In J. Metelmann (Ed.), Porno-Pop II. Im Erregungsdispoitiv (pp. 211–215). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  14. Härtel, I. (2011). Der Trieb als Übersetzungsfehler? Vom Einbrechen des Sexuellen. In M. Heinze, J. Loch-Falge, & S. Offe (Eds.), Übersetzungen. Verstehen und Missverstehen in Psychiatrie und Kulturtheorie (pp. 43–60). Berlin: Parados Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Härtel, I. (2014). Kinder der Erregung.ÜbergriffeundObjektein kulturellen Konstellationen kindlich jugendlicher-Sexualität (in collaboration with S. Witte). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, H. (1998). Introduction: Childhood innocence and other modern myths. In H. Jenkins (Ed.), The children’s culture reader (pp. 1–37). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kipnis, L. (2017). Unwanted advances: Sexual paranoia comes to campus. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  18. Lacroix, A. (2013). Kleiner Versuch über das Küssen. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz Berlin.Google Scholar
  19. Laplanche, J. (1988). Die allgemeine Verführungstheorie und andere Aufsätze. Tübingen: Edition Diskord.Google Scholar
  20. Laplanche, J. (1999). Essays on otherness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Laplanche, J. (2017). Sexual. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Leonard, S. (2017). From the women’s march to #MeToo, building feminist solidarity in the age of Trump. https://www.thenation.com/article/sex-and-solidarity/. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  23. Lewina K. (2018). Warum es erotisch ist, beim Sex vor jedem weiteren Schritt nachzufragen, ze.tt, https://ze.tt/warum-es-erotisch-ist-beim-sex-vor-jedem-weiteren-schritt-nachzufragen/. Accessed April 16, 2018.
  24. Matthews, A. (2017). Mother demands her son’s school take sleeping beauty off the curriculum because the princess doesn’t give consent to be kissed and woken up by the prince. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5110415/Mother-demands-son-s-school-ban-Sleeping-Beauty.html#ixzz5CASS4wYn. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  25. Merritt, S. (2017). Once upon a sexual assault… It’s not outrageous for fairytales to get a modern update. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/27/sexual-assault-sleeping-beauty-fairytales-ban-gender-rape. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  26. Nicks, R. G. (2008). Fairy tales and prostitutes: Sexualized corpses and the enforcement of true womanhood in popular nineteenth-century American literature. In E. Dill & S. Weinstein (Eds.), Death becomes her. Cultural narratives of femininity and death in nineteenth-century America. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Passett, P. (2001). Sexualität jenseits der Biologie – Hat der Pansexualismus der Psychoanalyse im Zeitalter der political correctness noch eine Zukunft? In A. Karger, G. Lettau, C. Weismüller, & O. Knellessen (Eds.), Sexuelle Übergriffe in Psychoanalyse und Psychotherapie (pp. 83–107). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  28. Pfaller, R. (2005). Der Normalnarzissmus der Verhandlungsmoral und seine Widersacherin, die Normalperversion – und was die Psychoanalyse aus ihrem Gegensatz lernen kann. Zu Franz Oberlehners Text ‘Sexualität und Bindung im Spätkapitalismus. Von der Normalneurose zur Normalperversion. In texte. psychoanalyse. ästhetik. kulturkritik (pp. 7–21). (Bd.25, H.4.).Google Scholar
  29. Pfaller, R. (2011). Wofür es sich zu leben lohnt: Elemente materialistischer Philosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  30. Pfaller, R. (2014). On the pleasure principle in culture: Illusions without owners. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Philips, A. (1993). On kissing, tickling, and being bored. Psychoanalytic essays on the unexamined life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Salecl, R. (1991). Die Gesellschaft existiert nicht. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Gestalten der Autorität. Seminar der Laibacher Lacan-Schule (pp. 27–35). Wien: Hora Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, G. (1998). Sexuelle Verhältnisse. Über das Verschwinden der Sexualmoral. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, G. (2004). Sexualität und Kultur. Soziokultureller Wandel der Sexualität. In R. Hornung, C. Buddeberg, & T. Bucher (Eds.), Sexualität im Wandel. Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG of the ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, G. (2005). Das neue Der Die Das. Über die Modernisierung des Sexuellen. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Sennett, R. (1976). The fall of public man. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  37. Stern (1 February 2007). No. 6.Google Scholar
  38. Sumter, K. (2017). Unhappily ever after. Do fairy tales promote sexual harassment? http://www.theweek.co.uk/89949/unhappily-ever-after-do-fairy-tales-promote-sexual-harassment. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  39. Wiggin, K. D. (2017). Ultimate collection: 21 Novels & 130 + Short stories, fairy tales and poems. New York: OK Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Wordley B. (2017). Sleeping beauty is the latest victim in the #MeToo campaign. http://www.essentialkids.com.au/news/current-affairs/sleeping-beauty-has-become-the-latest-victim-in-the-metoo-campaign-20171123-gzs0ho. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  41. Wright, M. (2017). Mother calls for sleeping beauty to be banned from primary school as it promotes 'inappropriate behaviour'. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/23/mother-calls-sleeping-beauty-banned-primary-school-promotes/. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  42. Wüllenweber, W. (2007). Voll Porno! stern (No. 6).Google Scholar
  43. Žižek, S. (1992). Mehr-genießen. Lacan in der Populärkultur. Wo es war 1. Wien: Turia & Kant.Google Scholar
  44. Žižek, S. (1997). Die Pest der Phantasmen. Wien: Passagen.Google Scholar
  45. Žižek, S. (2001). Die Tücke des Subjekts. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Žižek, S. (2017a). Sign a contract before sex? Political correctness could destroy passion. RT question more. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/414219-sex-political-correctness-relations/. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  47. Žižek, S. (2017b). Sexual is (not) political. http://sendika62.org/2017/06/sexual-is-not-political-slavoj-zizek 425922/. Accessed April 9, 2018.
  48. Zupančič, A. (2009). Warum Psychoanalyse? Drei Interventionen. Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
  49. Zupančič, A. (2017). What is sex?. Cambridge: MIT Press, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cultural Scholar at the International Psychoanalytic University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations