Advertisement

Trends in Organized Crime

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 295–309 | Cite as

When elites and outlaws do philanthropy: on the limits of private vices for public benefit

  • Tereza Kuldova
Article

Abstract

In the last decade, elitist philanthropy exploded in certain parts of the West and so did philanthropy of outlaw motorcycle clubs. The question is, under what conditions does philanthropy become an effective strategy of legitimization of one’s power in society? Neoliberalism did not only result in extreme inequality, weakening of the state, and emergence of increasingly disillusioned population, but also enabled philanthropy to become an effective strategy of legitimization of the informal power of both billionaires and criminal organizations alike. Philanthropy became instrumental both to image management in face of crises of reputation and to the insertion of these transnational non-state actors into governance. The destructive effects of neoliberalism allowed both groups to grow, and to reproduce and accelerate the very conditions in which they thrive, thus further weakening the state and fuelling inequality. The argument counters popular narratives about how private vices and greed can serve public benefit.

Keywords

Philanthropy Outlaw motorcycle clubs Crime Non-state governance 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by The Research Council of Norway through a FRIPRO Mobility Grant, contract no 250716. The FRIPRO Mobility grant scheme (FRICON) is co-funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under Marie Curie grant agreement no 608695.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

Author, Tereza Kuldova, declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acs Z (2014) Why philanthropy matters: how the wealthy give, and what it means for our economic well-being. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Barger RS (2001) Hell's angel: the life and times of Sonny Barger and the Hell's angels motorcycle Club. Fourth Estate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker HS (1963) Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop M, Green M (2008) Philanthrocapitalism: how the rich can save the world and why we should let them. A & C Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnett A (2004) The idea of the west: culture, politics and history. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brecht B (1967) Gesammelte Werke 2. Suhrkamp, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Crone J (2015) Multi-billionaire owner of luxury jewellers Cartier says the thought of the poor rising up and overthrowing the rich keeps him awake at night. Daily Mail (Mail Online) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3117048/Multi-billionaire-owner-luxury-jewellers-Cartier-says-thought-poor-rising-overthrowing-rich-keeps-awake-night.html
  8. Davies D (2009) Non-state armed actors, new imagined communities, and shifting patterns of sovereignty and insecurity in the modern world. Contemp Secur Policy 30(2):221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Guzman D (2017) 'Bikers for Trump' will form 'wall of meat' to protect inauguration from protestors. SF Gate. http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Bikers-for-Trump-will-form-wall-of-meat-to-10859328.php. Accessed 20 Jan 2017
  10. Denham J (2016) The commodification of the criminal corpse: 'selective memory' in posthumous representations. Mortality 21(3):229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deppe F (2013) Autoritärer Kapitalismus. VSA: Verlag, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickie J (2012) Mafia Brotherhoods: Camorra, mafia, 'ndrangheta: the rise of the Honoured Societies. Hodder & Stoughton, London (Kindle edition, Amazon)Google Scholar
  13. Durkheim E (1947) The division of labor in society. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Frazer JG (1894) The golden bough: a study in comparative religion. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambetta D (1988) Mafia: the price of distrust. In: Gambetta D (ed) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 158–175Google Scholar
  16. Gambetta D (2009) Codes of the underworld: how criminals communicate. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Gottschalk P (2010) Policing organized crime: intelligence strategy implementation. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall S (2012) Theorizing crime and deviance: a new perspective. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall S, Winlow S (2013) Rethinking social exclusion: the end of the social? SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall S, Winlow S, Ancrum C (2012) Criminal identities and consumer culture: crime, exclusion and the new culture of narcissism. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay I, Muller S (2014) Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Prog Hum Geogr 38(5):635–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakobsen KM (2016) Hells Angels til Danskene: - Ikke skyld på flyktningene. Dagbladet. Oslo. http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/hells-angels-til-danskene---ikke-skyld-pa-flyktningene/60538051
  23. Kapoor I (2016) Billionaire philanthropy: 'decaf capitalism'. In: Hay I, Beaverstock JV (eds) Handbook on wealth and the super-rich. Edward Elgar Publishers, London, pp 113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuldova T (2014) Designing an illusion of India's future Superpowerdom: of the rise of neo-aristocracy, Hindutva and Philanthrocapitalism. The Unfamiliar 4(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuldova T (2015) Designing Hypermuscular Neoaristocracy: of kings, gangsters and muscles in Indian cinema, fashion and politics. Film Fashion Consum 3(2):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuldova T (2016a) Fatalist luxuries: of inequality, wasting and anti-work ethic in India. Cultural Politics 12(1):110–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuldova T (2016b) Hells angels motorcycle Corporation in Fashion Business: on the fetishism of the trademark law. J Des Hist.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epw041
  28. Kuldova T (2016c) Luxury Indian fashion: a social critique. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuldova T (2017) Forcing 'Good' and the legitimization of informal power: Philanthrocapitlism and artistic nationalism among the Indian business elite. Asienforum 49(1–2):1–12Google Scholar
  30. Kupatadze A (2012) Organized crime, political transitions and state formation in post-soviet Eurasia. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lea J, Stenson K (2007) Security, sovereignty, and non-state governance 'From below. Can J Law Soc 22(2):9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehti M (2007) The wild west vs. the civilized west: popular cultural readings of transatlantic relations. 6th PanEuropean International Relations ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehti M (2009) American west vs European west: a struggle for ownership and legitimacy. In: Browning C, Lehti M (eds) The struggle for the west: a divided and contested legacy. Routledge, London, pp 90–115Google Scholar
  34. Little J (2015) The new Victorians? Celebrity charity and the demise of the welfare state. Celebrity Studies 6(4):471–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Livingstone N (2013) Polemic: 'Capital's charity. Capital Class 37(3):347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hell's Angels Working Toward Better Image (1974). The Corbin Times - Tribune Corbin, KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  37. Lupo S (2015) The two mafias: a transatlantic history, 1888–2008. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mannoni O (2003) I know well, but all the same. In: Rothenberg MA, Foster D (eds) Perversion and the Social Relation. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 68–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mauss M (1990) The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. McGoey L (2014) The philanthropic state: market-state hybrids in the Philanthrocapitlist turn. Third World Q 35(1):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGoey L (2015a) No such thing as free gift. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Nichols D (2012) The one percenter code: how to be an outlaw in a world gone soft. Motorbooks, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  43. Nickel PM, Eikenberry AM (2009) A critique of the discourse of Marketized philanthropy. Am Behav Sci 52(7):974–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nickel P, Eikenberry A (2010) Philanthropy in an era of global governance. In: Taylor R (ed) Third sector research. Springer New York, New York, pp 269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nuzzi G, Antonelli C (2012) Blood ties: the 'Ndrangheta: Italy's new mafia. Pan Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Odendahl T (1990) Charity begins at home: generosity and self-interest among the philanthropic elite. Basic Books, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostrower F (1998) The arts as cultural capital among elites: Bourdieu's theory reconsidered. Poetics 26:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ostrower F (2003) Why the wealthy give: the culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  49. Paoli L (2008) Mafia brotherhoods: organized crime, Italian style. Oxford University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pfaller R (2005) Where is your hamster? The concept of ideology in Slavoj Zizek's cultural theory. In: Boucher G, Glynos J, Sharpe M (eds) Traversing the fantasy: critical responses to Slavoj Žižek. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  51. Pfaller R (2014) On the pleasure principle in culture: illusions without owners. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Pipyrou S (2014) Altruism and sacrifice: mafia free gift giving in South Italy. Anthropol Forum 24(4):412–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reich R (2005) A failure of philanthropy: American charity shortchanges the poor, and public policy is partly to blame. Stanf Soc Innov Rev 3:24–33Google Scholar
  54. Singla A, Sagar P (2004) Trust and corporate social responsibility: lessons from India. J Commun Manag 8(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sipchen B (1994) The rough rider. The Los Angeles Times, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  56. Skaperdas S (2001) The political economy of organized crime: providing protection when the state does not. Econ Gov 2:173–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stallybrass P, White A (1986) The politics and poetics of transgression. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson CJ, Holt DB (2004) Man-of-action heroes: the pursuit of heroic masculinity in everyday consumption. J Consum Res 31:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tönnies F (2001) Community and civil society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Venkatesh SA (2008) Gang leader for a day: a rogue sociologist takes to the streets. Penguin Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. von Lampe K, Johansen O (2004) Organized crime and trust: on the conceptualization and empirical relevance of Trust in the Context of criminal networks. Global Crime 6(2):159–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walters R (2007) Critical criminology and the intensification of the authoritarian state. In: Barton A, Corteen K, Scott D et al (eds) Expanding the Criminological Imagination: Critical Readings in Criminology. Willan Publishing, Devon, pp 15–37Google Scholar
  63. Weber M (1985) Die drei reinen Typen der legitimen Herrschaft. In: Wincklemann J (ed) Max Weber: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissensschaftslehre. Mohr, Tübingen, pp 475–488Google Scholar
  64. Wijkström F (1998) Different faces of civil society. EFI Stockholm, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson J (2014) Jeffrey Sachs: the strange case of Dr shock to Mr aid. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Winlow S, Hall S, Treadwell J (2017) The rise of the right: the English defense league and the transformation of working class politics. Polity Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  67. Woodiwiss M (2005) Gangster capitalism: the United States and the global rise of organized crime. Constable, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Žižek S (2009) First as tragedy, then as farce. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations