Advertisement

Society

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 273–281 | Cite as

Oprah and the Politics of Consolation

  • Christina SimkoEmail author
Culture and Society
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Oprah Winfrey’s speech at the 2018 Golden Globes elicited widespread calls for the media mogul to enter the US presidential race in 2020. At the time, the passionate outpouring of support was generally interpreted as a reflection of Democrats’ desire for a liberal answer to President Donald Trump’s celebrity. Building on cultural sociology’s engagement with the symbolic dimensions of democratic power struggles, this article argues that commentators largely missed a crucial element of Winfrey’s appeal: namely, her focus on engaging the meaning of suffering, a task that has long been integral to the American president’s role. Moreover, Winfrey’s specific mode of engagement exhibits a striking homology with public representations of collective suffering in the United States, especially the suffering associated with terrorism. Drawing on a trauma framework, Winfrey encourages individuals to re-live past experiences of suffering and indeed to make such experiences the linchpins for their identities. Similarly, official memorials and museums cast episodes of terrorist violence as collective traumas—inviting visitors to re-experience these events and the grief they left in their wake, and portraying victimhood as central to American national identity. Identifying this homology not only helps to explain the appeal of a Winfrey candidacy, but also illuminates the role of suffering in contemporary US politics more generally.

Keywords

Politics Suffering Trauma Terrorism Oprah Winfrey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank James L. Nolan, Jr., Doug Bafford, and the students in the Brandeis Workshop for Critical Inquiry and Education for their engagement and feedback.

Further Reading

  1. Alexander, J. C. 2010a. Heroes, Presidents, and Politics. Contexts, 9(4), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. 2010b. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. New York:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C., & Jaworsky, B. N. 2014. Obama Power. Malden, MA:Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. C., et al. 2004. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley:University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (revised ed.). New York:Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Applebaum, Anne. 2018. “The ‘Oprah in 2020’ Talk is Proof of our Democracy’s Degradation.” Washington Post, January 9.Google Scholar
  7. Barro, Josh. 2018. “Oprah might be the President America Needs Right Now.” Business Insider, January 8. http://www.businessinsider.com/oprah-president-america-needs-2020-2018-1 (accessed February 13, 2018).
  8. Bellah, R. 1992. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in a Time of Trial. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bellah, R., et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Berger, P. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York:Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, P., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. 1974. The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. New York:Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Brennan, Patrick. 2017. “Obama’s ‘Amazing Grace.’” National Review, January 20.Google Scholar
  13. Breuninger, Kevin. 2018. “Oprah Would Easily Beat Trump in a Presidential Election, Poll Says.” CNBC, January 10. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/10/oprah-would-easily-beat-trump-in-a-presidential-election-poll.html (accessed January 22, 2018).
  14. Bruni, Frank. 2018. “At the Golden Globes, Hollywood Does What Washington Won’t.” New York Times, January 8.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, C. 2001. A New Age Theodicy for a New Age. In P. Heelas, D. Martin, & L. Woodhead (Eds.), Peter Berger and the Study of Religion (pp. 73–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2008. Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Caruth, C. 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History (twentieth anniversary ed.). Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clinton, William J. 1996. “Address Before a Joint Session of Congress on the State of the Union.” The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=53091 (accessed June 25, 2018).
  19. Costa, Robert. 2018. “Talk of Oprah Running for President Captivates Democrats.” Washington Post, January 8.Google Scholar
  20. C-SPAN. 2001. “New York City Prayer Service.” September 23. https://www.c-span.org/video/?166250-1/york-city-prayer-service. Accessed 22 Feb 2018.
  21. Davis, J. E. 2005. Accounts Of innocence: Sexual Abuse, Trauma, and the Self. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Douthat, Ross. 2018. “Oprah: Prophet, Priestess . . . Queen?” New York Times, January 10.Google Scholar
  23. Eyerman, R. 2011. The Cultural Sociology of Political Assassination. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fallows, James. 2015. “Obama’s Grace.” The Atlantic, June 27.Google Scholar
  25. Farrell, K. 1998. Post-Traumatic Culture: Injury and Interpretation in the Nineties. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fassin, D., & Rechtman, R. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood. Translated by Rachel Gomme. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Faust, D. G. 2008. This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War. New York:Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gallup. n.d. “Presidential Approval Ratings—Bill Clinton.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/116584/presidential-approval-ratings-bill-clinton.aspx (accessed June 25, 2018).
  29. Hacking, I. 1995. Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heer, Jeet. 2018. “Why the Democrats Won’t Nominate Oprah for President.” New Republic, January 8.Google Scholar
  31. Hochschild, A. R. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York:The New Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hunter, J. D. 2000. The Death of Character: Moral Education in an Age Without Good or Evil. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Illouz, E. 2003. Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture. New York:Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Illouz, E. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Malden, MA:Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Illouz, E. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Imber, J. B. (Ed.) 2004. Therapeutic Culture: Triumph and Defeat. New York:Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Kansteiner, W. 2004. Genealogy of a Category Mistake: A Critical Intellectual History of the Cultural Trauma Metaphor. Rethinking History, 8(2), 193–221.Google Scholar
  38. Keating, Peter. 2010. “Remembering Oklahoma City, and How Bill Clinton Saved His Presidency.” New York Magazine, April 19.Google Scholar
  39. Krieg, Gregory. 2018. Oprah Leads Trump in New Poll—But Can’t Transcend Partisan Divide.” CNN, January 12. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/12/politics/oprah-trump-2020-presidential-poll/index.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.
  40. Leibniz, G. W. 1985 [1710]. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil. LaSalle, IL:Open Court Press.Google Scholar
  41. Los Angeles Times. 2018. “Read the Full Transcript of Oprah Winfrey’s Speech that Fired Up the Golden Globes.” January 7. Google Scholar
  42. Mason, Jeff. 2018. “Trump Would Welcome Challenge from Oprah Winfrey for President.” Reuters, January 7. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-awards-goldenglobes-oprah/trump-would-welcome-challenge-from-oprah-winfrey-for-president-idUSKBN1EX08F (accessed January 22, 2018).
  43. New York Times. 2005. “Waiting for a Leader.” September 1. Google Scholar
  44. Nolan Jr., J. L. 1998. The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century’s End. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Noonan, Peggy. 2018. “Trump, Oprah, and the Art of Deflection.” Wall Street Journal, January 11. Google Scholar
  46. Obama, Barack. 2004. “Keynote Address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.” The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=76988 (accessed June 25, 2018).
  47. Olick, J. K. 1999. Collective Memory: The Two Cultures. Sociological Theory, 17(3), 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pew Research Center. 2008. “Bush and Public Opinion.” http://www.people-press.org/2008/12/18/bush-and-public-opinion/ (accessed June 25, 2018).
  49. Podhoretz, John. 2017. “Democrats’ Best Hope for 2020: Oprah.” New York Post, September 27.Google Scholar
  50. Podhoretz, John. 2018. “Oprah 2020? I Told You So.” New York Post, January 8.Google Scholar
  51. Poniewozik, James. 2018. “What Politicians Could Learn from Oprah.” New York Times, January 8.Google Scholar
  52. Price, Greg. 2018. “Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden Would Beat Oprah Before She Even Gets to Trump, Poll Shows.” Newsweek, January 11.Google Scholar
  53. Purcell, S. J. 2002. Sealed with Blood: War, Sacrifice, and Memory in Revolutionary America. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rieff, P. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Robertson, Derek. 2018. “Why Oprah Hates Politics.” Politico, January 9.Google Scholar
  56. Rodricks, Dan. 2017. “What Do We Expect from Trump? He’s the Opposite of Obama.” Baltimore Sun Roughly Speaking Blog, August 13. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ maryland/dan-rodricks-blog/bal-what-do-we-expect-from-trump-he-s-not-obama-20170813-story.html (accessed June 22, 2018).
  57. Rosenberg, E. S. 2003. A Date Which Will Live: Pearl Harbor in American Memory. Durham, NC:Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silva, J. 2013. Coming Up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. New York:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simko, C. 2015. The Politics of Consolation: Memory and the Meaning of September 11. New York:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A. D. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. New York:Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Stevens, Heidi. 2018. “Oprah for President? I Have a Better Idea.” Los Angeles Times, January 8.Google Scholar
  62. Stuckey, M. E. 1991. The President as Interpreter-in-Chief. Chatham, NJ:Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, Jessica. 2018. “Oprah Beats Trump in NPR Poll, But Most Americans Don’t Want Her to Run for President.” NPR, January 12. https://www.npr.org/2018/01/12/577456987/oprah-beats-trump-in-npr-poll-but-most-americans-dont-want-her-to-run-for-presid (accessed January 22, 2018).
  64. Tulis, J. K. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, B. S. 1996. For Weber: Essays on the Sociology of Fate (second ed.). London:Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  66. Wagner-Pacifici, R. 2017. What is an Event? Chicago:University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weber, M. 1946a. The Social Psychology of the World Religions. In H. H. Gerth, & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 267–301). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Weber, M. 1946b. The Sociology of Charismatic Authority. In Gerth and Mills, From Max Weber (pp. 245–252).Google Scholar
  69. Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, Thomas Chatterton. 2018. “Oprah, Don’t Do It.” New York Times, January 8. Google Scholar
  71. Winfrey, Oprah. 2013. “‘He Has Become Our Light’: Oprah Talks to the Wheelers.” Oprah.com, November. http://www.oprah.com/spirit/oprah-talks-to-francine-and-david-wheeler-sandy-hook-parents. Accessed 22 Feb 22, 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anthropology & SociologyWilliams CollegeWilliamstownUSA

Personalised recommendations