Advertisement

Society

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 158–165 | Cite as

Empathy as Care: the Model of Palliative Medicine

  • Natalia Ruiz-JuncoEmail author
  • Daniel R. Morrison
Social Science and Public Policy

Abstract

This article elaborates the ascent of what we call the empathy as care model in contemporary medicine. We make the following arguments: First, does empathy mean care? We examine this question in the context of medicine. We argue that empathy may not mean care throughout all medical practice, as findings from the medical education field show. However, empathy as care is rising in one specialty, palliative and hospice medicine. This specialty best represents the ideal-typical traits of the empathy as care model. This work contributes to the sociology of health and illness literature and to interpretivist sociological theorizing by examining empathy within the context of heath care meant to relieve pain and discomfort, often at the end of life, rather than curative medicine.

Keywords

Empathy Palliative and hospice medicine Interpretivism Sociological theory Care 

Notes

Further Reading

  1. Ariès, Philippe. [1981] 2008. The hour of our death: The classic history of Western attitudes toward death over the last one thousand years. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D. 1991. The altruism question. Hillsdale:Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bekoff, M. 2007. The emotional lives of animals: A leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy-and why they matter. Novato:New World Library.Google Scholar
  4. Bhang, T. N., & Iregui, J. C. 2013. Creating a climate for healing: A visual model for goals of care discussions. Journal of palliative medicine, 16(7), 718–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boston, P., Towers, A., & Barnard, D. 2001. Embracing vulnerability: Risk and empathy in palliative care. Journal of Palliative Care, 17(4), 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bury, M. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bury, M. 1991. The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health & Illness, 13(4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busfield, J. 2017. The concept of medicalisation reassessed. Sociology of Health Illness, 39(5), 759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charmaz, Kathy. 1993. Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, David. 2016. To Comfort Always: A History of Palliative Medicine since the Nineteenth Century: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cooley, Charles Horton. 1992. Human Nature and the Social Order: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Dudley, R. A., & Luft, H. S. 2001. Managed Care in Transition. New England journal of medicine, 344(14), 1087–1092.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200104053441410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumanovsky, T., Augustin, R., Rogers, M., Lettang, K., Meier, D. E., & Morrison, R. S. 2016. The growth of palliative Care in us Hospitals: A status report. Journal of palliative medicine, 19(1), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Freidson, Eliot. 1989. Medical Work in America: Essays on Health Care: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goleman, Daniel. 1998. Working with Emotional Intelligence: Bantam.Google Scholar
  17. Greenhalgh, Susan. 2001. Under the Medical Gaze: Facts and Fictions of Chronic Pain: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Groark, K. P. 2008. Social opacity and the dynamics of empathic in-sight among the Tzotzil Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. Ethos, 36(4), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A. R. 2013. Empathy maps (pp. 17–32). Emotional Labor and Time Binds:Pathways to Empathy. New Studies on Commodification.Google Scholar
  20. Hojat, M., Vergare, M. J., Maxwell, K., Brainard, G., Herrine, S. K., Isenberg, G. A., Veloski, J., & Gonnella, J. S. 2009. The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of Erosion of empathy in medical school. Academic Medicine, 84(9), 1182–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleinman, Arthur. 1988. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition: Basic books.Google Scholar
  22. Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. 2012. Functional neural plasticity and associated changes in positive affect after compassion training. Cerebral cortex, 23(7), 1552–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. 2013. Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. 2011. Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game. PloS one, 6(3), e17798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liben, Stephen. 2011. “Empathy, compassion, and the goals of medicine.” pp. 59-67 in Whole Person Care: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Lupton, Deborah. 1997. “Foucault and the medicalisation critique.” pp. 94-110 in Foucault, Health and Medicine, edited by A. P. a. R. Bunton. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lupu, D. 2010. Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage. Journal of pain and symptom management, 40(6), 899–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacBride-Stewart, S. 2013. The effort to control time in the ‘New’general practice. Sociology of health & illness, 35(4), 560–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcum, J. A. 2005. Biomechanical and phenomenological models of the body, the meaning of illness and quality of care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 7(3), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maynard, D. W., & Heritage, J. 2005. Conversation analysis, doctor–patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education, 39(4), 428–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKinlay, J. B., & Marceau, L. D. 2002. The end of the Golden age of doctoring. International Journal of Health Services, 32(2), 379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikesell, L. 2013. Medicinal relationships: Caring conversation. Medical Education, 47(5), 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mischler, E. 1984. The discourse of medicine. Norwood:Ablex.Google Scholar
  34. Morrison, R. S., Maroney-Galin, C., Kralovec, P. D., & Meier, D. E. 2005. The growth of palliative care programs in United States hospitals. Journal of palliative medicine, 8(6), 1127–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nyatanga, B. 2013. Empathy in palliative care: Is it possible to understand another person? International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 19(10), 471–471.  https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.10.471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Obama, Barack 2006, “Northwestern University Commencement Speech“. (http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2006/06/barack.html). Accessed 7 March 2019.
  37. Pilnick, A., & Dingwall, R. 2011. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: A critical review. Social Science & Medicine, 72(8), 1374–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preusche, I., & Lamm, C. 2016. Reflections on empathy in medical education: What can we learn from social neurosciences? Advances in health sciences education, 21(1), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reich, Warren T. 1995. “History of the Notion of Care.” Pp. 319–31 in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, edited by W. T. Reich. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Riess, H. 2010. Empathy in medicine—A neurobiological perspective. Jama, 304(14), 1604–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose, N. 2001. The politics of life itself. Theory, culture & society, 18(6), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose, Nikolas and Joelle M Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenfield, P. J., & Jones, L. 2004. Striking a balance: Training medical students to provide empathetic care. Medical Education, 38(9), 927–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruiz-Junco, N. 2017. Advancing the sociology of empathy: A proposal. Symbolic Interaction, 40(3), 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rummery, K., & Fine, M. 2012. Care: A critical review of theory, policy and practice. Social Policy Administration, 46(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruusuvuori, J. 2001. Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor–patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schroeder, David A, Louis A Penner, John F Dovidio and Jane A Piliavin. 1995. The Psychology of Helping and Altruism: Problems and Puzzles: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Shaw, J. 2012. The birth of the clinic and the advent of reproduction: Pregnancy, pathology and the medical gaze in modernity. Body & Society, 18(2), 110–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sinclair, S., Beamer, K., Hack, T. F., McClement, S., Bouchal, S. R., Chochinov, H. M., & Hagen, N. A. 2017. Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliative medicine, 31(5), 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stanley, P., & Hurst, M. 2011. Narrative palliative care: A method for building empathy. Journal of social work in end-of-life & palliative care, 7(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stueber, Karsten. 2010. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Throop, C. J. 2008. On the problem of empathy: The case of yap, Federated States of Micronesia. Ethos, 36(4), 402–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Timmermans, S., & Oh, H. 2010. The continued social transformation of the medical profession. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S94–S106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vanderminden, J., & Potter, S. J. 2010. Challenges to the doctor-patient relationship in the twenty-first century. The new Blackwell companion to medical sociology, 355.Google Scholar
  55. Ventura, M. 2018. Applied empathy: The new language of leadership. New York:Touchstone.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyAnthropology & Social Work Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations