pp 1–4 | Cite as

Religions and Politics of Asian Pacific Americans

  • Joseph Yi
  • Joe PhillipsEmail author
Social Science and Public Policy


The 2018 US elections continued the polarization over social and economic issues and the divides among races, geographies, religiosity, and education levels. There is, however, a less obvious dynamic – the increasing politicization of Asian Pacific Americans (APA) – that, in time, may contribute to more civil dialogue and consensus. Though APAs are diverse, a significant percentage are uniquely simultaneously inliberal and conservative camps. Like many liberals, they are urban or suburban, highly educated, and espouse social justice and tolerance. Like many conservatives, they are religious and embrace 'traditional values' (e.g., heterosexual marriage, 'pro-life'). APAs are a growing presence in electoral politics, but, perhaps more importantly, on the nation's campuses, where they interact with liberals, and in churches, where they discourse with conservatives, decreasing the social distance between these polarized groups and contributing to more tolerant, deliberative politics.


Asian Pacific Americans Evangelical Christian Deliberative democracy Polarization US elections 


Further Reading

  1. Bishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Boys, Don. 2017 (11 Feb.). “Evangelical Leaders Twist the Bible to Promote Immigration and Denounce President Trump!”
  3. Braunstein, Ruth. 2017. “Muslims as Outsiders, Enemies and Others: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Politics of Religious Exclusion.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 5(3): 355-372.Google Scholar
  4. Brow, Mark V. 2016. “Investigating the Perceptions of Intellectual Diversity among Socially Conservative Christian Seniors at Elite U.S. Colleges.” Journal of Research on Christian Education 25(1): 38-55.Google Scholar
  5. Campus Access Issues. (accessed Jan. 6, 2018).Google Scholar
  6. Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 2010.Google Scholar
  7. Conger, Kimberly H. and Bryan T. McGraw. 2008. “Religious Conservatives and the Requirements of Citizenship: Political Autonomy.” Perspectives on Politics 6(2): 253-266.Google Scholar
  8. Daily Californian. 2018 (1 Nov.). “Student Action Cuts Ties with Senator Isabella Chow.”
  9. Deseret News. 2015 (5 March). “LDS Church, LGBT Advocates Back Anti-Discrimination.”
  10. Faith in the Campus Conversation. 2014 (23 May).
  11. Fox News. 2018 (14 Nov.). “Christian Student Senator at UC Berkeley Harassed for Abstaining from Pro-LGBTQ Vote.”
  12. Gross, Neil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. InterVarsity Supports Religious Freedom. 2016 (Nov. 30).
  14. Jeung, Russell. 2002. “Asian American Pan-ethnic Formation and Congregational Culture,” in Pyong Gap Min and Jung Ha Kim, eds., Religions in Asian America: Building Faith Communities. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press: 215-244.Google Scholar
  15. Keller, Timothy. 2008. The Reason for God. New York: Dutton Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, Rebecca Y. 2006. God’s New Whiz Kids?: Korean American Evangelicals on Campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2017. “The Condition of Education 2017 (NCES 2017-144), Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty.” U.S. Department of Education.
  18. Perry, Michael J. 2004. Under God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2012. Asian Americans: A Mosaic of Faiths. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center.
  20. Pew Research Center. 2017 (5 Oct.). “Partisan Divides over Political Values Widen.”
  21. Putnam, Robert D. and David E. Campbell. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick. 2016 (26 July). “How Asian Americans Became Democrats.” The American Prospect.
  23. Simmel, Georg. 1971. On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings (ed. Donald N. Levine). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Snyder, Scott. 2007. “American Religious NGOs in North Korea: A Paradoxical Relationship.” Ethics & International Affairs 21(4): 423-30.Google Scholar
  25. Steensland, Brian and Philip Goff. 2013. The New Evangelical Social Engagement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Whitehead, Andrew, Samuel Perry, and Joseph Baker. 2018. “Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Sociology of Religion 79(2): 147-171.Google Scholar
  27. Yancey, George. 2015 (27 March). “What Christianophobia Looks Like in America.” Christianity Today.Google Scholar
  28. Yancey, George. 2017 (18 Sept.). “The Academic Reason Why There Are So Few Conservatives in Academia.” Patheos (blog).Google Scholar
  29. Yi, Joseph and Joe Phillips. 2018. “Christian Case for Engaging North Korea.” Pacific Affairs 91(3): 523-537.Google Scholar
  30. Yi, Joseph, Gowoon Jung, Saul Serna Segura, Joe Phillips, and Jerry Park. 2018. “Gay Seouls: Expanding Religious Spaces for Non-Heterosexuals in South Korea.” Journal of Homosexuality 65(11): 1457-1483.Google Scholar
  31. Yuan, Christopher. 2016. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless. Wipf & Stock Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceHanyang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Underwood International College, Justice and Civil Leadership MajorYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations