Advertisement

Police Strain, Negative Emotions, Criminal Propensity, and Criminal Coping

  • Stephen W. BaronEmail author
Article

Abstract

Utilizing a sample of homeless street youths, the paper draws on general strain theory to understand how police contact and perceived police injustice are related to two forms of criminal coping. It also examines if the relationship between the two police strain measures and criminal coping is mediated by anger and depression. Further, it explores if a composite criminal propensity moderator recently theorized in GST influences the relationships between police strains and coping. Findings show both forms of police strain have direct relationships with property crime, while only police contact has a direct relationship with violence. Further, both forms of police strain have an indirect relationship with violence through anger. Finally, criminal propensity moderates the relationship between both forms of police strain and violent offending but not property offending. Suggestions for further research are offered.

Keywords

Police contact Perceived police injustice General strain theory Composite moderator 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Special thanks also to Nic Swagar and Fiona Kay for their assistance and to the reviewers for their valuable contributions. Address all correspondence to Stephen W. Baron, Department of Sociology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3 N6, 613-533-2170, (email:barons@queensu.ca).

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain that most likely lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Agnew, R. (2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34, 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Augustyn, M. B., & Ray, J. V. (2015). Psychopathy and perceptions of procedural justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 170–183.Google Scholar
  7. Barkworth, J. M., & Murphy, K. (2015). Procedural justice policing and citizen compliant behavior: The importance of emotion. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 21, 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, S. W. (2009). Differential coercion, street youth, and violent crime. Criminology, 47, 239–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, S. W., & Hartnagel, T. F. (1998). Street youth and criminal violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 166–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beaver, K. M., DeLisi, M., Mears, D. P., & Stewart, E. (2009). Low self-control and contact with the criminal justice system in a nationally representative sample of males. Justice Quarterly, 26, 695–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006a). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006b). Gender, race, and urban policing: The experience of African American youth. Gender & Society, 20, 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craig, J. M., Cardwell, S. M., & Piquero, A. (2017). The effects of criminal propensity and strain on later offending. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1655–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2014). Foundation for a temperament-based theory of antisocial behavior and criminal justice involvement. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagan, J., & Piquero, A. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferdik, F. V., Wolfe, S. W., & Blasco, N. (2014). Informal social control, procedural justice and perceived police legitimacy: Do social bonds influence evaluations of police legitimacy. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, W., Lurigio, A. J., Greenleaf, R. G., & Albertson, S. (2004). Encounters between police officers and youths: The social costs of disrespect. Journal of Crime and Justice, 27, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner –city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, P. G. (2012). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. In P. Adler, P. Adler, & P. K. O’Brien (Eds.), Drugs and the American Dream: An anthology (pp. 277–284). Malden MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursick, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1997). Mean streets. Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hinds, L. (2007). Building police-youth relationships: The importance of procedural justice. Youth Justice, 7, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hinds, L. (2009). Youth, police legitimacy, and informal contact. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 24, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isom, D. (2016). Microaggressions, injustices, and racial identity: An empirical assessment of the theory of African American offending. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32, 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Isom Scott, D. (2017). The new Juan Crow?: Unpacking the links between discrimination and crime for Latinxs. Race and Justice, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368717721613.
  29. Ivanich, J. D., & Warner, T. D. (2018). Seen or unseen? The role of race in police contact among homeless youth. Justice Quarterly, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1463389
  30. Jang, S. J., & Song, J. (2015). A “rough test” of a delinquent process model of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janeksela, G. M. (1999). Juvenile attitudes toward the police: Theory and application. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 23, 313–329.Google Scholar
  32. Lin, W., & Mieczkowski, T. (2011). Subjective strain, conditioning factors, and juvenile delinquency: General strain theory in Taiwan. Asian Criminology, 6, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lopes, G., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Schmidt, N. M., Visquez, B. E., & Bernberg, J. G. (2012). Labeling and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of formal police interventions on life chances and crime during emerging adulthood. Crime and Delinquency, 58, 456–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mastrofski, S. D., Reisig, M. D., & McCluskey, J. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40, 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsuda, K. N., Melde, C., Taylor, T. J., Freng, A., & Esbensen, F. (2013). Gang membership and adherence to the “code of the street”. Justice Quarterly, 30, 440–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazerolle, P., & Mahs, J. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazerolle, P., Piquero, A. R., & Capowich, G. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime: Further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLean, K., & Wolfe, S. E. (2016). A sense of injustice loosens the moral bind of the law. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moon, B., & Morash, M. (2017). A test of general strain theory in South Korea: A focus on objective/subjective strain, negative emotions, and composite conditioning factors. Crime & Deliqneuncy, 63, 731–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nagin, D., & Telep, C. W. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory 2 nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  43. O’Grady, B., Gaetz, S., & Buccieri, K. (2013). Policing street youth in Toronto. In S. Gaetz, B. O’Grady, K. Buccieri, J. Karbanow, & A. Marsolais (Eds.), Youth homelessness in the Canadian context: Implications for policy and practice (pp. 335–352). Toronto: Canadian Homelessness Research Network Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ousey, G. C., Wilcox, P., & Schrek, C. J. (2015). Violent victimization, confluence of risks, and the nature of criminal behavior. Testing main and interactive effects from Agnew’s extension of General Strain Theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Penner, E. K., Viljoen, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Roesch, R. (2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piquero, A. R., & Rosay, A. B. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. A comment on Longshore et al. Criminology, 36, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sargeant, E., & Bond, C. E. W. (2015). Keeping it in the family: Parental influences on young people’s attitudes to police. Journal of Sociology, 51, 917–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheurman, H. L. (2013). The relationship between injustice and crime: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schuck, A. M. (2013). A life-course perspective on adolescents’ attitudes to police: DARE, delinquency, and residential segregation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 579–607.Google Scholar
  51. Simons, R. L., Chen, Y.-F., Stewart, E. A., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Incidents of discrimination and risk for delinquency: A longitudinal test of strain theory with an African-American sample. Justice Quarterly, 20, 827–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Slocum, L. A., & Wiley, S. A. (2018). Experience of the expected? Race and ethnicity differences in the effects of police contact on youth. Criminology, 56, 402–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slocum, L. A., Wiley, S. A., & Esbensen, F. A. (2016). The importance of being satisfied: A longitudinal exploration of police contact, procedural injustice, and subsequent delinquency. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sommers, R. (2013). Governing the streets: The legal, social and moral regulation of homeless youth. In S. Gaetz, B. O’Grady, K. Buccieri, J. Karbanow, & A. Marsolais (Eds.), Youth homelessness in the Canadian context: Implications for policy and practice (pp. 369–386). Toronto: Canadian Homelessness Research Network Press.Google Scholar
  55. Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2006). Structure and culture in African American adolescent violence: A partial test of the code of the street thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology, 48, 569–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor, T. J., Esbensen, F., Brick, B. T., & Freng, A. (2010). Exploring the measurement quality of an attitudinal scale of street code-related violence: Similarities and differences across groups and contexts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thaxton, S., & Agnew, R. (2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 897–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanism in the Canberra RISE drinking- and-driving- experiment. Law & Society Review, 41, 553–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiley, S. A., & Esbensen, F. A. (2016). The effect of police contact: Does official intervention result in deviance amplification? Crime and Delinquency, 62, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Willits, D. (2017). Violent propensity, strain, and violent intentions: A test of Agnew’s revised conditioning hypothesis. Deviant Behavior, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1411046.
  62. Wolfe, S. E. (2011). The effect of low self-control on perceived police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zapolski, T. C. B., Banks, D. E., Lau, K. S. L., & Aalsma, M. C. (2018). Perceived police injustice, moral disengagement, and aggression, among juvenile offenders: Utilizing the general strain model. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 49, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations