The Influence of Scope, Frames, and Extreme Willingness to Pay Responses on Cost of Crime Estimates
As governments with limited fiscal resources seek to invest in the “best” programs to prevent crime, they often first try to identify the true costs of crime to guide these decisions. Contingent valuation (CV) is a common survey method used to elicit how much the public is willing to pay (WTP) to reduce a particular crime. We utilize one of the first datasets in criminal justice that includes open-ended WTP data gathered from a survey using factorial design and random assignment. WTP figures are then input into a formula which also takes into account 1) the number of households and 2) the number of crimes “avoided,” which is calculated based upon the percentage crime reduction presented to survey respondents. Drawing upon data from a representative sample of the United States, we assess how sensitive respondents are to crime type, crime reduction percentages, program types, and framing. Results demonstrate that in general, open-ended WTP surveys elicit highly skewed responses and that respondents are more willing to pay for crime reduction programs with a higher number of individual components. However, respondents are not sensitive to crime reductions or several other survey framing techniques. Importantly, due to these highly skewed WTP values and lack of responsivity to crime control percentages, final cost of crime numbers vary widely – potentially altering policy decisions driven by these methods. We conclude with a discussion of the appropriateness of these methods for accurately estimating the costs of crime.
KeywordsCosts of crime Willingness to pay Policy decision-making Open-ended survey Framing
This project was supported by Award 2013-IJ-CX-0058, granted by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Any opinions, viewpoints, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. All code for analyses are available upon request by contacting the first author. Data are available through the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACJD/studies/36520/summary
- Anderson, D. A. (2013). The cost of crime. In Foundations and trends in microeconomics (Vol. 7: No. 3, pp. 209–265). Hanover: Now Publishers.Google Scholar
- Aos, S., Lee, S., Drake, E., Pennucci, A., Klima, T., Miller, M., Anderson, L., Mayfield, J., & Burley, M. (2011). Return on investment: Evidence-based options to improve statewide outcomes (Document No. 11-07-1201). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601–4614.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2018). Percent distribution of expenditure for the justice system by type of government, fiscal 2015. Justice Expenditure and Employment Extracts Program (JEEE). Available at: http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6310. Accessed May 7 2019.
- Carson, R. T., Mitchell, R. C., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J., Presser, S., & Ruud, P. A. (1992). A contingent valuation study of lost passive use values resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar
- Chalfin, A. (2015). Economic costs of crime. In W. Jennings (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of crime and punishment (pp. 1–12). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M.A., Rust, R.T., Steen, S. & Tidd, S.T. (2004). Willingness to pay for crime control programs. Criminology, 42, 89–109.Google Scholar
- Department of Justice. (2012). Prison rape elimination act regulatory impact assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Available at: https://ojp.gov/programs/pdfs/prea_ria.pdf
- Harrell, E. (2015). Victims of identity theft, 2014. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
- Galvin, M. A., Loughran, T.A., Simpson, S.S., & Cohen, M.A. (2018). Victim compensation policy and white-collar crime: Public preferences in a national willingness-to-pay survey. Criminology and Public Policy, 17, 553–594.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, P. W., Rydell, C. P., Abrahamse, A.F., Caulkins, J.P., Chiesa, J., Model, K.E., & Klein, S.P. (1994). Three strikes and you’re out: Estimated costs and benefits of California’s new mandatory-sentencing law. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. (2014). Considerations in applying benefit-cost analysis to preventative interventions for children, youth, and families: Workshop summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Kerr, G. N., Sharp, B. M., & White, P. (2003). The economics of augmenting Christchurch’s water supply. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand), 42, 113–124.Google Scholar
- Kristof, K. (2018, February 6th). Identity theft has never been more rampant. CBS News. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/identity-theft-hits-record-high/
- Levy, D. S., Hammitt, J. K., Duan, N., Downes-LeGuin, T., & Friedman, D. (1995). Conceptual and statistical issues in contingent valuation: Estimating the value of altered visibility in the Grand Canyon. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
- Linden, L. & Rockoff, J.E. (2008). Estimates of the impact of crime risk on property values from Megan’s laws. American Economic Review, 98, 1103–1127.Google Scholar
- Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Obama, B. (2017). The President’s role in advancing criminal justice reform. Harvard Law Review, 130, 811.Google Scholar
- Picasso, E., & Cohen, M. A. (2019). Valuing the public’s demand for crime prevention programs: A discrete choice experiment. Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3015649 Accessed May 7 2019.
- Piché, J. (2015). Playing the “treasury card” to contest prison expansion: Lessons from a public criminology campaign. Social Justice, 41((3 137)), 145–167.Google Scholar
- Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1992). Significant benefits: The igh scope perry preschool study through age 27. Ysplanti: High Scope Press.Google Scholar
- Simpson, S. S., Cohen, M. A., & Loughran, T. A. (2015). White-collar and corporate frauds: understanding and measuring public policy preferences, United States. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2018-05-16. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36520.v1
- United States Census Bureau. (2007). 2007 Data release. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/2007_release/. Accessed May 7 2019.