Advertisement

Changes in Arrest Patterns of Buyers and Sellers of Commercial Sex: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis

  • Alexander H. UpdegroveEmail author
  • Lisa R. Muftic
  • Erin A. Orrick
Article

Abstract

Although the commercial sex trade consists of three distinct parties—buyers, sellers, and facilitators—sellers are the most likely to be criminalized for their role in prostitution. In 2015, the Texas state legislature passed Senate Bill (S.B.) 825. This bill created separate offense codes for buyers and sellers of commercial sex. Prior to this, buyers and sellers were legally indistinguishable from each other under Texas law. Legally distinguishing buyers from sellers recognizes that different roles exist within the commercial sex trade, and serves as a necessary prerequisite for creating divergent pathways for individuals in these roles (e.g., targeting buyers with criminal sanctions, but providing sellers with access to victim services and diversion programs). This study examined whether S.B. 825 was associated with a shift in the number of buyers and sellers arrested for prostitution in Harris County, Texas. Findings revealed that the enactment of S.B. 825 corresponded with an increase in the number of prostitution arrests buyers accounted for, and an observable decrease in the number of prostitution arrests sellers accounted for. These changes remained relatively stable over a one-year period after the bill took effect.

Keywords

Prostitution Sex work Arrest decision Police discretion Law enforcement 

Notes

References

  1. Alpert, G. P., Dunham, R. G., Stroshine, M., Bennett, K., & MacDonald, J. (2006). Police officers’ decision making and discretion: Forming suspicion and making a stop. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved July 17, 2018 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/213004.pdf.
  2. Alter, C. (2015). Catching johns: The national push to arrest men who buy sex. Time. Retrieved March 7, 2018 from http://time.com/sex-buyers-why-cops-across-the-u-s-target-men-who-buy-prostitutes/.
  3. Amnesty International (2016). Amnesty International policy on state obligations to respect, protect and fulfill the human rights of sex workers. Retrieved January 3, 2019 from https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/POL3040622016ENGLISH.PDF.
  4. Armstrong, L. (2017). From law enforcement to protection? Interactions between sex workers and police in a decriminalized street-based sex industry. British Journal of Criminology, 57, 570–588.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, S. D. (2014). The long shadow: Decreasing barriers to employment, housing, and civic participation for people with criminal records will improve public safety and strengthen the economy. Western State Law Review, 42(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Bettio, F., Giusta, M. D., & Di Tommaso, M. L. (2017). Sex work and trafficking: Moving beyond dichotomies. Feminist Economies, 23(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, M., & Preuhs, R. R. (2009). Collateral consequences of a collateral penalty: The negative effect of felon disenfranchisement laws on the political participation of nonfelons. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 722–743.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, D. D., Potterat, J. J., Muth, S. Q., & Roberts, J. M., Jr. (2006). A large specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a prostitute. PLoS One, 1(1), e60.Google Scholar
  9. Butcher, K. (2003). Confusion between prostitution and sex trafficking. The Lancet, 361(9373), 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, C. A. (2005). No second chance: People with criminal records denied access to public housing. University of Toledo Law Review, 36, 545–594.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, S. E., Lonczak, H. S., & Clifasefi, S. L. (2017). Seattle’s law enforcement assisted diversion (LEAD): Program effects on recidivism outcomes. Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 49–56.Google Scholar
  12. Danna, D. (2012). Client-only criminalization in the city of Stockholm: A local research on the application of the “Swedish model” of prostitution policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(1), 80–93.Google Scholar
  13. Denver, M., Siwach, G., & Bushway, S. D. (2017). A new look at the employment and recidivism relationship through the lens of a criminal background check. Criminology, 55(1), 174–204.Google Scholar
  14. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.Google Scholar
  15. Ekberg, G. (2004). The Swedish law that prohibits the purchase of sexual services. Violence Against Women, 10(10), 1187–1218.Google Scholar
  16. Farley, M., & Kelly, V. (2000). Prostitution: A critical review of the medical and social sciences literature. Women & Criminal Justice, 11(4), 29–64.Google Scholar
  17. Farrell, A., & Cronin, S. (2015). Policing prostitution in an era of human trafficking enforcement. Crime, Law and Social Change, 64(4), 211–228.Google Scholar
  18. Gerassi, L., & Nichols, A. J. (2017). Sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: Prevention, advocacy, and trauma-informed practice. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Gutierrez, E. J. D. (2014). Prostitution and gender-based violence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 161, 96–101.Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, M., & Worthen, M. G. F. (2011). Sex disparities in arrest outcomes for domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1559–1578.Google Scholar
  21. Hedlin, S. (2017). Can prostitution law reform curb sex trafficking? Theory and evidence on scale substitution, and replacement effects. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50, 329–386.Google Scholar
  22. Hickle, K., & Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2017). “Curiosity and a pimp”: Exploring sex trafficking victimization in experiences of entering sex trade industry work among participants in a prostitution diversion program. Women & Criminal Justice, 27(2), 122–138.Google Scholar
  23. Huffman, J. (2015). S.B. 825: Bill analysis. Senate Research Center. Retrieved September 6, 2016, from ftp://ftp.legis.state.tx.us/bills/84R/analysis/html/senate_bills/SB00800_SB00899/SB00825I.HTM.
  24. Hunt, A. S. (2013). Deconstructing demand: The driving force of sex trafficking. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 19(2), 225–241.Google Scholar
  25. In re B.W., 313 S.W.3d 818 (Tex. Sup. Ct. 2010).Google Scholar
  26. Juliano, F. (2016). Report: Bust more ‘johns’ in prostitution cases. Connecticut Post. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Report-finds-gender-disparity-in-6750909.php.
  27. Kissil, K., & Davey, M. (2010). The prostitution debate in feminism: Current trends, policy and clinical issues facing an invisible population. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 22(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  28. Ko, L. (2015). Arresting demand for prostitution. Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved September 9, 2016, from http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/blog/targeting-sex-buyers-not-sex-sellers-arresting-demand-for-prostitution/.
  29. Kochel, T. R., Wilson, D. B., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2011). Effect of suspect race on officers’ arrest decisions. Criminology, 49(2), 473–512.Google Scholar
  30. Kurlychek, M. C., Brame, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2006). Scarlet letters and recidivism: Does an old criminal record predict future offending? Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 483–504.Google Scholar
  31. Kuzma, A. L. (2013). Demand reduction: Critical next step in the fight against sex trafficking. International Law News, 42(4), 27–30.Google Scholar
  32. Lederer, L. J. (2010). Addressing demand: Why and how policymakers should utilize law and law enforcement to target customers of commercial sexual exploitation. Regent University Law Review, 23, 297–310.Google Scholar
  33. Leon, C. S., & Shdaimah, C. S. (2012). JUSTifying scrutiny: State power in prostitution diversion programs. Journal of Poverty, 16, 250–273.Google Scholar
  34. Liberman, A. M., Kirk, D. S., & Kideuk, K. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52(3), 345–370.Google Scholar
  35. Linden, A. (2015). Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal, 15(2), 480–500.Google Scholar
  36. Lutnick, A., & Cohan, D. (2009). Criminalization, legalization or decriminalization of sex work: What female sex workers say in San Francisco, USA. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(34), 38–46.Google Scholar
  37. Lytle, D. J. (2014). The effects of suspect characteristics on arrest: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 589–597.Google Scholar
  38. Majic, S. (2015). “I’m just a woman. But I’ve never been a victim”: Re-conceptualizing prostitution policy through individual narratives. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(4), 365–387.Google Scholar
  39. Matthews, R. (2015). Female prostitution and victimization: A realist analysis. International Review of Victimology, 21(1), 85–100.Google Scholar
  40. McDowall, D., McLeary, R., Meidinger, E. E., & Hay, R. A. (1980). Interrupted time series analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. McKin, J., & Bottari, M. (2014). Massachusetts state police data: Far more women than men arrested for prostitution-related offenses. The Republican. Retrieved September 9, 2016, from http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2014/10/massachusetts_state_police_data_prostitution_arrests.html.
  42. McNeill, M. (2014). Lies, damned lies and sex work statistics. The Washington Post. Retrieved January 3, 2019 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/03/27/lies-damned-lies-and-sex-work-statistics/?utm_term=.24f54aa2d843.
  43. Mehlman-Orozco, K. (2016). Consenting prostitutes or trafficked victims? The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved February 25, 2019, from https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-sex-trafficking-20160619-story.html.
  44. Monroe, J. (2005). Women in street prostitution: The result of poverty and the brunt of inequity. Journal of Poverty, 9(3), 69–88.Google Scholar
  45. Muftic, L. R., & Finn, M. A. (2013). Health outcomes among women trafficked for sex in the United States: A closer look. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(9), 1859–1885.Google Scholar
  46. Muftic, L. R., & Updegrove, A. H. (2019). The effectiveness of a problem solving court for individuals charged with misdemeanor prostitution. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2018.1562506.
  47. Niemi, J. (2010). What we talk about when we talk about buying sex. Violence Against Women, 16(2), 159–172.Google Scholar
  48. Nixon, K., Tutty, L., Downe, P., Gorkoff, K., & Ursel, J. (2002). The everyday occurrence: Violence in the lives of girls exploited through prostitution. Violence Against Women, 8(9), 1016–1043.Google Scholar
  49. O'Brien, E. (2015). Prostitution ideology and trafficking policy: The impact of political approaches to domestic sex work on human trafficking policy in Australia and the United States. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  50. O'Doherty, T. (2011). Victimization in off-street sex industry work. Violence Against Women, 17(7), 944–963.Google Scholar
  51. Outshoorn, J. (2005). The political debates on prostitution and trafficking of women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(1), 141–155.Google Scholar
  52. Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pfeffer, R., Ormachea, P., & Eagleman, D. (2018). Gendered outcomes in prostitution arrests in Houston, Texas. Crime & Delinquency, 64(12), 1538–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717748576.
  54. Phillips, S. W., & Varano, S. P. (2008). Police criminal charging decisions: An examination of post-arrest decision-making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 307–315.Google Scholar
  55. Quinn, M. C. (2006). Revisiting Anna Moscowitz’s Kross’s critique of New York City’s women’s court: The continued problem of solving the “problem” of prostitution with specialized criminal courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(2), 101–160.Google Scholar
  56. Quinn, M. C. (2009). The modern problem-solving court movement: Domination of discourse and untold stories of criminal justice reform. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 31(1), 57–82.Google Scholar
  57. Rissel, C., Donovan, B., Yeung, A., de Visser, R. O., Grulich, A., Simpson, J. M., & Richters, J. (2017). Decriminalization of sex work is not associated with more men paying for sex: Results from the second Australian study of health and relationships. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 14, 81–86.Google Scholar
  58. Roe-Sepowitz, D. E., Hickle, K. E., Loubert, M. P., & Egan, T. (2011). Adult prostitution recidivism: Risk factors and impact of a diversion program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(5), 272–285.Google Scholar
  59. Ruth, T., Matusitz, J., & Simi, D. (2017). Ethics of disenfranchisement and voting rights in the U.S.: Convicted felons, the homeless, and immigrants. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 56–68.Google Scholar
  60. Sallmann, J. (2010). “Going hand-in-hand”: Connections between women's prostitution and substance use. Journal of Social Work in the Addictions, 10(2), 115–138.Google Scholar
  61. Sanborn, R. D., & Lew, D. (2012). Fighting human trafficking in Texas. Texas Bar Journal, 75(10), 778–781.Google Scholar
  62. Seattle Women’s Commission. (1995). Project to address the legal, political, and service barriers facing women in the sex industry. Seattle, WA: The Commission.Google Scholar
  63. Shdaimah, C. S., & Bailey-Kloch, M. (2014). “Can you help with that instead of putting me in jail?”: Participant insights on Baltimore City’s specialized prostitution diversion program. Justice System Journal, 35(3), 287–300.Google Scholar
  64. Shdaimah, C. S., & Wiechelt, S. A. (2012). Crime and compassion: Women in prostitution at the intersection of criminality and victimization. International Review of Victimology, 19(1), 23–35.Google Scholar
  65. Shively, M., Kliory, K., Wheeler, K., & Hunt, D. (2012). A national overview of prostitution and sex trafficking demand reduction efforts: Final report. The National Institute of Justice. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238796.pdf.
  66. Simonton, D. (1977). Cross-sectional time-series experiments: Some suggested statistical analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 489–502.Google Scholar
  67. Stata (n.d.). Regress postestimation time series: Postestimation tools for regress with time series. Retrieved September 30, 2017, from https://www.stata.com/manuals13/rregresspostestimationtimeseries.pdf.
  68. Tasca, M., Rodriguez, N., Spohn, C., & Koss, M. P. (2012). Police decision making in sexual assault cases: Predictors of suspect identification and arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(6), 1157–1177.Google Scholar
  69. Terrill, W., & Paoline, E. A., III. (2007). Nonarrest decision making in police-citizen encounters. Police Quarterly, 10(3), 308–331.Google Scholar
  70. Tex. S. B. 825, 84th Leg., R.S. (2015).Google Scholar
  71. Thrupkaew, N. (2012). Opinion: A misguided moral crusade. The New York Times. Retrieved July 18, 2018 from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/opinion/sunday/ending-demand-wont-stop-prostitution.html.
  72. Updegrove, A. H., Muftic, L. R., & Niebuhr, N. (2018). Criminal justice system outcomes for buyers, sellers, and facilitators of commercial sex in Houston, Texas, Crime & Delinquency, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718787473.
  73. Wahab, S., & Panichelli, M. (2013). Ethical and human rights issues in coercive interventions with sex workers. Journal of Women and Social Work, 28(4), 344–349.Google Scholar
  74. Walls, N. E., & Bell, S. (2011). Correlates of engaging in survival sex among homeless youth and young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 423–436.Google Scholar
  75. Weidner, R. (2001). “I won’t do Manhattan”: Causes and consequences of a decline in street prostitution. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  76. Weitzer, R. (1999). Prostitution control in America: Rethinking public policy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 32(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  77. Weitzer, R. (2005). Flawed theory and method in studies of prostitution. Violence Against Women, 11(7), 934–949.Google Scholar
  78. Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics and Society, 35(3), 447–475.Google Scholar
  79. Weitzer, R. (2009). Sociology of sex work. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 213–234.Google Scholar
  80. Weitzer, R. (2010). The mythology of prostitution: Advocacy research and public policy. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 7(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  81. Wiechelt, S. A., & Shdaimah, C. S. (2011). Trauma and substance abuse among women in prostitution: Implications for a specialized diversion program. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 159–184.Google Scholar
  82. Wiley, S. A., Slocum, L. A., & Esbensen, F. A. (2013). The unintended consequences of being stopped or arrested: An exploration of the labeling mechanisms through which police contact leads to subsequent delinquency. Criminology, 51(4), 927–966.Google Scholar
  83. Yen, I. (2008). Of vice and men: A new approach to eradicating sex trafficking by reducing male demand through educational programs and abolitionist legislation. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 653–686.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander H. Updegrove
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa R. Muftic
    • 2
  • Erin A. Orrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice and CriminologySam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal Justice & SociologyWestern New England UniversitySpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations