Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 603–626 | Cite as

The Contingent Effects of Fatherhood on Offending

  • Ojmarrh Mitchell
  • Monica Landers
  • Melissa Morales
Article

Abstract

A growing body of research assesses the relationship between fatherhood and desistance. Qualitative studies typically find fatherhood reduces offending, especially substance use; yet, quantitative studies have produced mixed findings. Guided by life-course theory, this study hypothesizes that fatherhood affects certain kinds of offending and fatherhood’s effects on offending are most pronounced among fathers who reside with their child. To test our hypotheses, NLSY97 data are employed along with fixed-effects regression analyses to estimate the relationship between fatherhood and offending, while controlling for time-varying and time-stable competing factors. Periods of fatherhood are associated with reductions in licit and illicit substance use but not other kinds of offending, and these effects are considerably stronger in periods in which fathers resided in the same household as their child. By contrast, residential fatherhood is associated with reductions in property offending and arrest. These results confirm the findings of qualitative research in that fatherhood, particularly residential fatherhood, reduces substance use but has weaker effects on other kinds of deviance.

Keywords

Life-course criminology Fatherhood Parenthood Substance use Desistance 

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary: SAS Institute Inc..Google Scholar
  2. Blokland, A. A. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2006). The effect of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43(4), 1203–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Center for Human Resource Research. (2003). NLSY97 user's guide: A guide to the rounds 1–5 data National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Derzon, J. H. (2010). The correspondence of family features with problem, aggressive, criminal, and violent behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(3), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2001). Fatherood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. Chicago: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  6. Eggebeen, D. J., & Knoester, C. (2001). Does fatherhood matter for men? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of marriage, separation and children on offending by adult males. In Z. Blau & J. Hagan (Eds.), Current perspectives on aging and the life cycle. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fleisher, M. S., & Krienert, J. L. (2004). Life-course events, social networks, and the emergence of violence among female gang members. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(5), 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ganem, N. M., & Agnew, R. (2007). Parenthood and adult criminal offending: The importance of relationship quality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 630–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giordano, P. C. (2010). Legacies of crime: A follow-up of the children of highly delinquent girls and boys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giordano, P. C., Seffrin, P., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Parenthood and crime: The role of wantedness, relationships with partners, and ses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golub, A., Johnson, B. D., & Dunlap, E. (2005). Subcultural evolution and illicit drug use. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(3), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1995). Young people and crime. London: Research and Planning Unit, Home Office.Google Scholar
  16. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes, M. (1998). Turning points in the lives of young inner-city men forgoing destructive criminal behaviors: A qualitative study. Social Work Research, 22(3), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kreager, D. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Erosheva, E. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48(1), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landers, M., Mitchell, O., & Coates, E. (2015). Teenage fatherhood as a potential turning point in the lives of delinquent youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(6), 1685–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Legal Action Center. (2004). After prison: Roadblocks to reentry. New York: Legal Action Center.Google Scholar
  23. Martinez, G., Daniels, K., & Chandra, A. (2012). Fertility of men and women aged 15–44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Worcester: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). A symbolic interactionist theory of role-transitions, role-commitments, and delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 163–213). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Monsbakken, C. W., Lyngstad, T. H., & Skardhamar, T. (2013). Crime and the transition to parenthood: The role of sex and relationship context. British Journal of Criminology, 53, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, W., Pedlow, S., Krishnamurty, P., & Wolter, K. (2000). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97): Technical sampling report. Washington, D.C.: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  28. Moore, J. W., & Hagedorn, J. (2001). Female gangs: A focus on research: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1269–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Na, C. (2016). The consequences of fatherhood transition among disadvantaged male offenders: Does timing matter? Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology, 2, 182–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1991). On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency. Criminology, 29(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the 'feared self': Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156.Google Scholar
  33. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal models using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rand, A. (1987). Transitional life events and desistance from delinquency and crime. In M. E. Wolfgang, T. P. Thornberry, & R. M. Figlio (Eds.), From boy to man, from delinquency to crime (pp. 134–162). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Savolainen, J. (2009). Work, family and criminal desistance: Adult social bonds in a Nordic welfare state. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sedgh, G., Finer, L. B., Bankole, A., Eilers, M. A., & Singh, S. (2015). Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: Levels and recent trends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skardhamar, T., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2009). Family formation, fatherhood and crime: An invitationo to a broader perspective on crime and family transitions (Vol. Discussion papers no. 579): Statistics Norway, Research Department.Google Scholar
  41. Theobald, D., Farrington, D. P., & Piquero, A. R. (2015). Does the birth of a first child reduce the father's offending? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thornberry, T. P., Wei, E. H., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & van Dyke, J. (2000). Teenage fatherhood and delinquent behavior. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32(2), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uggen, C., & Wakefield, S. (2008). What have we learned from longitudinal studies of work and crime? In A. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal Research (pp. 191–219). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2004). Having a kid changes everything? The effects of parenthood on subsequent crime. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  46. Western, B., & McClanahan, S. (2000). Fathers behind bars: The impact of incarceration on family formation. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  47. Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 230–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2012). Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behaviour for men and women. Crime and Delinquency, 60(8), 1209–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ojmarrh Mitchell
    • 1
  • Monica Landers
    • 1
  • Melissa Morales
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of CriminologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Bioethics & Science PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations