Advertisement

AVRM: adaptive void recovery mechanism to reduce void nodes in wireless sensor networks

  • A. Ayyasamy
  • E. Golden Julie
  • Y. Harold Robinson
  • S. Balaji
  • Raghvendra Kumar
  • Le Hoang Son
  • Pham Huy ThongEmail author
  • Ishaani Priyadarshini
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Nowadays, routing in three-dimensional environments is necessary since sensor nodes are organized in those kinds of areas. In this routing mechanism, data packets are routed using geographic routing by constructing a forwarding area. It is assumed that nodes in the network are homogeneous which contain the same energy level and sensing parameter. In this paper, we propose a new method to reduce the void node problem called Adaptive Void Recovery Mechanism, which is implemented by two folds namely position management and forwarding management concepts. Position management is implemented by sensing the surroundings using the base station and location management. Forwarding management is implemented using the assured factor value and cumulative value from the gathered data. The sensor nodes are elected with a minimized congestion packet latency value. Cluster-based routing technique is implemented to improve the network lifetime and network throughput. The proposed method is evaluated by simulation against the related methods like CREEP, EECS, FABC-MACRD in terms of End to End Delay, Residual Energy, Energy Consumption, Routing Overhead, Network Lifetime, and Network Throughput.

Keywords

WSN End-to-end delay Data packet GRP Void recovery Cluster head 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed MR, Huang X, Sharma D, Cui H (2012) Wireless Sensor Network: Characteristics and Architectures. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering 6(12)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    He T, Stankovic JA, Lu C, Abdelzaher T (2003) SPEED: a stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In distributed computing systems, 2003. Proceedings. 23rd international conference on (pp. 46-55). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassanein H, Luo J, 2006. Reliable energy aware routing in wireless sensor networks. In second IEEE workshop on dependability and security in sensor networks and systems (pp. 54-64). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng L, Niu J, Cao J, Das SK, Gu Y (2014) QoS aware geographic opportunistic routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 25(7):1864–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdallah AE, Fevens T, Opatrny J (2008) High delivery rate position-based routing algorithms for 3D ad hoc networks. Comput Commun 31(4):807–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdallah AE, Fevens T, Opatrny J (2007) Power-aware 3D position-based routing algorithms for ad hoc networks. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 3130-3135). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braginsky D, Estrin D (2002) Rumor routing algorthim for sensor networks. In proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications (pp. 22-31). ACMGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amanpreet K, Padam K, Gupta GP (2018) Nature Inspired Algorithm-Based Improved Variants of DV-Hop Algorithm for Randomly Deployed 2D and 3D Wireless Sensor Networks. Wirel Pers Commun 1:–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lata BT, Tejaswi V, Shaila K, Raghavendra M, Venugopal KR, Iyengar SS, Patnaik LM (2014) December. SGR: secure geographical routing in wireless sensor networks. In 2014 9th international conference on industrial and information systems (ICIIS), pp. 1-6, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Djenouri D, Bagaa M (2017) Energy-aware constrained relay node deployment for sustainable wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing 2(1):30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Servetto SD, Barrenechea G (2002) Constrained random walks on random graphs: routing algorithms for large scale wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on wireless sensor networks and applications (pp. 12-21). ACMGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Entezami F, Politis C (2015) Three-dimensional position-based adaptive real-time routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2015(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang H, Yin H, Luo Y, Zhang X, Min G, Fan Q (2016) Three-dimensional geographic routing in wireless mobile ad hoc and sensor networks. IEEE Netw 30(2):82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Z, Zhang L, Zheng Z, Wang J (2018) Energy balancing RPL protocol with multipath for wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 11(5):1085–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schurgers C, Srivastava MB (2001) Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In military communications conference, 2001. MILCOM 2001. Communications for network-centric operations: creating the information force. IEEE (Vol. 1, pp. 357-361). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah RC, Rabaey JM (2002) Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks. In wireless communications and networking conference, 2002. WCNC2002. 2002 IEEE (Vol. 1, pp. 350-355). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jain M, Mishra MK, Gore MM (2009) Energy aware beaconless geographical routing in three dimensional wireless sensor networks. In 2009 first international conference on advanced computing (pp. 122-128). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bechkit W, Koudil M, Challal Y, Bouabdallah A, Souici B, Benatchba K (2012) A new weighted shortest path tree for convergecast traffic routing in WSN. In computers and communications (ISCC), 2012 IEEE symposium on (pp. 000187-000192). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu WJ, Feng KT (2009) Three-dimensional greedy anti-void routing for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 8(12):5796–5800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang Y, Song WZ, Wang W, Li XY, Dahlberg TA (2006) LEARN: localized energy aware restricted neighborhood routing for ad hoc networks. In 2006 3rd annual IEEE communications society on sensor and ad hoc communications and networks (Vol. 2, pp. 508-517). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang M, Li F, Wang Y (2010) Energy-efficient restricted greedy routing for three dimensional random wireless networks. In International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (pp. 95–104). Springer Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang Z, Zhang D, Alfandi O, Hogrefe D (2011) Efficient geographical 3D routing for wireless sensor networks in smart spaces. In: internet communications (BCFIC Riga), 2011 Baltic congress on future (pp. 168-172). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zakariayi S, Babaie S (2018) DEHCIC: a distributed energy-aware hexagon based clustering algorithm to improve coverage in wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications:1–16Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiuwu Y, Feng Z, Lixing Z, Qin L (2018) Novel data fusion algorithm based on event-driven and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. Wirel Pers Commun 100(4):1377–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suniti D, Sunil A, Renu V (2018) Cluster-head restricted energy efficient protocol (CREEP) for routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 100(4):1477–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palvinder S, Mann, Satvir S (2018) Optimal node clustering and scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 100(3):683–708zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mali GU, Gautam DK (2018) Shortest path evaluation in wireless network using fuzzy logic. Wirel Pers Commun 100(4):1393–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guanghui H, Licui Z (2018) WPO-EECRP: energy-efficient clustering routing protocol based on weighting and parameter optimization in WSN. Wirel Pers Commun 98(1):1171–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dutt S, Agrawal S, Vig R (2018) Cluster-head restricted energy efficient protocol (CREEP) for routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5649-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saranya V, Shankar S, Kanagachidambaresan GR (2018) Energy efficient clustering scheme (EECS) for wireless sensor network with Mobile sink. Wirel Pers Commun 100:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5653-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kalaikumar K, Baburaj E (2018) FABC-MACRD: fuzzy and artificial bee Colony based implementation of MAC, Clustering, Routing and Data Delivery by Cross-Layer Approach in WSN, Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1–23Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jha S, Son LH, Kumar R, Priyadarshini I, Smarandache F, Long HV (2019) Neutrosophic image segmentation with dice coefficients. Measurement 134:762–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen GN, Son LH, Ashour AS, Dey N (2019) A survey of the state-of-the-arts on Neutrosophic sets in biomedical diagnoses. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kapoor R, Gupta R, Kumar R, Son LH, Jha S (2019) New scheme for underwater acoustically wireless transmission using direct sequence code division multiple access in MIMO systems. Wirel Netw 25:4541–4553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1750-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Son LH, Jha S, Kumar R, Chatterjee JM, Khari M (2019) Collaborative handshaking approaches between Internet of Computing and Internet of Things towards a Smart World: A review from 2009–2017. Telecommun Syst 70:617–634.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0481-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Son LH, Fujita H (2019) Neural-fuzzy with representative sets for prediction of student performance. Appl Intell 49(1):172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saravanan K, Aswini S, Kumar R, Son LH (2019) How to prevent maritime border collision for fisheries?-a Design of Real-Time Automatic Identification System. Earth Sci Inf 12:241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-018-0371-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Long HV, Ali M, Son LH, Khan M, Doan Ngoc T (2019) A novel approach for fuzzy clustering based on Neutrosophic association matrix. Comput Ind Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harold Robinson Y, Golden Julie E, Saravanan K, Kumar R, Son LH (2019) FD-AOMDV: fault-tolerant disjoint ad-hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing algorithm in Mobile ad-hoc networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:4455–4472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1126-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Singh N, Son LH, Chiclana F, Magnot J-P (2019) A new fusion of Salp swarm with sine cosine for optimization of non-linear functions. Eng Comput:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00696-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sumit K, Bansal RK, Mittal M, Goyal LM, Kaur I, Verma A, Son LH (2019) Mixed pixel decomposition based on extended fuzzy clustering for single spectral value remote sensing images. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 47:427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-00946-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Son PH, Son LH, Jha S, Kumar R, Chatterjee JM (2019) Governing Mobile virtual network operators in developing countries. Util Policy 56:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Garg R, Mittal M, Son LH (2019) Reliability and energy efficient workflow scheduling in cloud environment. Clust Comput 22:1283–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-02911-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kapoor R, Gupta R, Son LH, Jha S, Kumar R (2019) Adaptive technique with cross correlation for lowering signal-to-noise Ratio Wall in sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 105:787–802.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06121-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kapoor R, Gupta R, Son LH, Kumar R (2019) Iris localization for direction and deformation Independence based on polynomial curve fitting and singleton expansion. Multimed Tools Appl 78:19279–19303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7314-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Son LH, Tuan TM, Fujita H, Dey N, Ashour AS, Ngoc VTN, Anh LQ, Chu D-T (2018) Dental diagnosis from X-ray images: an expert system based on fuzzy computing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 39C:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ali M, Son LH, Khan M, Tung NT (2018) Segmentation of dental X-ray images in medical imaging using Neutrosophic orthogonal matrices. Expert Syst Appl 91:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tam NT, Hai DT, Son LH, Vinh LT (2018) Improving lifetime and network connections of 3D wireless sensor networks based on fuzzy clustering and particle swarm optimization. Wirel Netw 24(5):1477–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ngan RT, Ali M, Son LH (2018) Delta-equality of intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a new proximity measure and applications in medical diagnosis. Appl Intell 48(2):499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ali M, Dat LQ, Son LH, Smarandache F (2018) Interval complex Neutrosophic set: formulation and applications in decision-making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 20(3):986–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jude Hemanth D, Anitha J, Popescu DE, Son LH (2018) A modified genetic algorithm for performance improvement of transform based image steganography systems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(1):197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ali M, Son LH, Thanh ND, Van Minh N (2018) A Neutrosophic recommender system for medical diagnosis based on algebraic Neutrosophic measures. Appl Soft Comput 71:1054–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Giap CN, Son LH, Chiclana F (2018) Dynamic structural neural network. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34:2479–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kapoor R, Gupta R, Son LH, Jha S, Kumar R (2018) Detection of power quality event using histogram of oriented gradients and support vector machine. Measurement 120:52–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Singh K, Singh K, Son LH, Aziz A (2018) Congestion control in wireless sensor networks by hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm. Comput Netw 138:90–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pham BT, Son LH, Hoang T-A, Nguyen D-M, Bui DT (2018) Prediction of shear strength of soft soil using machine learning methods. Catena 166:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jude Hemanth D, Anitha J, Son LH (2018) Brain signal based human emotion analysis by circular Back propagation and deep Kohonen neural networks. Comput Electr Eng 68:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ngan RT, Son LH, Cuong BC, Ali M (2018) H-max distance measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in decision making. Appl Soft Comput 69:393–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Son LH, Chiclana F, Kumar R, Mittal M, Khari M, Chatterjee JM, Baik SW (2018) ARM-AMO: an efficient association rule mining algorithm based on animal migration optimization. Knowl-Based Syst 154:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kapoor R, Gupta R, Son LH, Jha S, Kumar R (2018) Boosting performance of power quality event identification with KL divergence measure and standard deviation. Measurement 126:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Le T, Son LH, Vo MT, Lee MY, Baik SW (2018) A cluster-based boosting algorithm for bankruptcy prediction in a highly imbalanced dataset. Symmetry-Basel 10:250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Khan M, Son LH, Ali M, Chau HTM, Na NTN, Smarandache F (2018) Systematic review of decision making algorithms in extended Neutrosophic sets. Symmetry-Basel 10:314–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Saravanan K, Anusuya E, Kumar R, Son LH (2018) Real-time water quality monitoring using internet of things in SCADA. Environ Monit Assess 190:556–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dey A, Le Hoang S, Kishore Kumar PK, Selvachandran G, Quek SG (2018) New concepts on vertex and edge coloring of simple vague graphs. Symmetry-Basel 10(9):373–391zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Doss S, Anand N, Suseendran G, Tanwar S, Khanna A, Son LH, Thong PH (2018) APD-JFAD: accurate prevention and detection of jelly fish attack in MANET. IEEE Access 6:56954–56965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ali M, Khan H, Son LH, Florentin S, Vasantha Kandasamy WB (2018) New soft set based class of linear algebraic codes. Symmetry-Basel 10(10):510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Jude Hemanth D, Anitha J, Son LH, Mittal M (2018) Diabetic retinopathy diagnosis from retinal images using modified Hopfield neural network. J Med Syst 42:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ngan TT, Lan LTH, Ali M, Tamir D, Son LH, Tuan TM, Rishe N, Kandel A (2018) Logic connectives of complex fuzzy sets. Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology 21(4):344–358Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jain R, Jain N, Kapania S, Son LH (2018) Degree approximation-based fuzzy partitioning algorithm and applications in wheat production prediction. Symmetry-Basel 10(12):768–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jude H, Anitha J, Naaji A, Geman O, Popescu D, Son LH (2018) A modified deep convolutional neural network for abnormal brain image classification. IEEE Access 7(1):4275–4283Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Son LH, Thong PH (2017) Soft computing methods for WiMax network planning on 3D geographical information systems. J Comput Syst Sci 83(1):159–179MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Phong PH, Son LH (2017) Linguistic vector similarity measures and applications to linguistic information classification. Int J Intell Syst 32(1):67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Son LH, Thong PH (2017) Some novel hybrid forecast methods based on picture fuzzy clustering for weather Nowcasting from satellite image sequences. Appl Intell 46(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Son LH, Tuan TM (2017) Dental segmentation from X-ray images using semi-supervised fuzzy clustering with spatial constraints. Eng Appl Artif Intell 59:186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hai DT, Son LH, Vinh LT (2017) Novel fuzzy clustering scheme for 3D wireless sensor networks. Appl Soft Comput 54:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Son LH, Van Viet P, Van Hai P (2017) Picture inference system: a new fuzzy inference system on picture fuzzy set. Appl Intell 46(3):652–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Son LH (2017) Measuring analogousness in picture fuzzy sets: from picture distance measures to picture association measures. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 16(3):359–378MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Thanh ND, Ali M, Son LH (2017) A novel clustering algorithm in a Neutrosophic recommender system for medical diagnosis. Cogn Comput 9(4):526–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Son LH, Tien ND (2017) Tune up fuzzy C-means for big data: some novel hybrid clustering algorithms based on initial selection and incremental clustering. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 19(5):1585–1602MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ali M, Son LH, Deli I, Tien ND (2017) Bipolar Neutrosophic soft sets and applications in decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:4077–4087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Son LH, Tuan TM (2016) A cooperative semi-supervised fuzzy clustering framework for dental X-ray image segmentation. Expert Syst Appl 46:380–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Son LH (2016) Dealing with the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems: a comparative review. Inf Syst 58:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wijayanto AW, Purwarianti A, Son LH (2016) Fuzzy geographically weighted clustering using artificial bee colony: an efficient geo-demographic analysis algorithm and applications to the analysis of crime behavior in population. Appl Intell 44(2):377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Thong PH, Son LH (2016) Picture fuzzy clustering: a new computational intelligence method. Soft Comput 20(9):3549–3562zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Son LH, Van Hai P (2016) A novel multiple fuzzy clustering method based on internal clustering validation measures with gradient descent. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 18(5):894–903MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tuan TM, Ngan TT, Son LH (2016) A novel semi-supervised fuzzy clustering method based on interactive fuzzy satisficing for dental X-ray image segmentation. Appl Intell 45(2):402–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Son LH, Louati A (2016) Modeling municipal solid waste collection: a generalized vehicle routing model with multiple transfer stations, gather sites and inhomogeneous vehicles in time windows. Waste Manag 52:34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Son LH, Phong PH (2016) On the performance evaluation of intuitionistic vector similarity measures for medical diagnosis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31:1597–1608zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Son LH (2016) Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering. Appl Soft Comput 46:284–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Thong PH, Son LH (2016) A novel automatic picture fuzzy clustering method based on particle swarm optimization and picture composite cardinality. Knowl-Based Syst 109:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Thong PH, Son LH (2016) Picture fuzzy clustering for complex data. Eng Appl Artif Intell 56:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ngan TT, Tuan TM, Son LH, Minh NH, Dey N (2016) Decision making based on fuzzy aggregation operators for medical diagnosis from dental X-ray images. J Med Syst 40(12):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Son LH (2015) DPFCM: a novel distributed picture fuzzy clustering method on picture fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Son LH, Thong NT (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy recommender systems: an effective tool for medical diagnosis. Knowl-Based Syst 74:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Thong NT, Son LH (2015) HIFCF: an effective hybrid model between picture fuzzy clustering and intuitionistic fuzzy recommender Systems for Medical Diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 42(7):3682–3701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Son LH (2015) HU-FCF++: a novel hybrid method for the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 41:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Son LH (2015) A novel kernel fuzzy clustering algorithm for geo-demographic analysis. Inf Sci 317:202–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Robinson YH, Julie EG, Kumar R, Son LH (2019) Probability-based cluster head selection and fuzzy multipath routing for prolonging lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 12(5):1061–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ayyasamy
    • 1
  • E. Golden Julie
    • 2
  • Y. Harold Robinson
    • 3
  • S. Balaji
    • 4
  • Raghvendra Kumar
    • 5
  • Le Hoang Son
    • 6
    • 7
  • Pham Huy Thong
    • 8
    • 9
    Email author
  • Ishaani Priyadarshini
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and TechnologyAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAnna University Regional CampusTirunelveliIndia
  3. 3.School of Information Technology and EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringFrancis Xavier Engineering CollegeTirunelveliIndia
  5. 5.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringGIET UniversityGunupurIndia
  6. 6.Institute of Research and DevelopmentDuy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam
  7. 7.VNU Information Technology InstituteVietnam National UniversityHanoiVietnam
  8. 8.Informetrics Research GroupTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  9. 9.Faculty of Information TechnologyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  10. 10.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations