Advertisement

Laplacian matrices and Turing bifurcations: revisiting Levin 1974 and the consequences of spatial structure and movement for ecological dynamics

  • Jean P. GibertEmail author
  • Justin D. Yeakel
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

We revisit a seminal paper by Levin (Am Nat 108:207–228, 1974), where spatially mediated coexistence and spatial pattern formation were described. We do so by reviewing and explaining the mathematical tools used to evaluate the dynamics of ecological systems in space, from the perspective of recent developments in spatial population dynamics. We stress the importance of space-mediated stability for the coexistence of competing species and explore the ecological consequences of space-induced instabilities (Turing instabilities) for spatial pattern formation in predator–prey systems. Throughout, we link existing theory to recent developments in discrete spatially structured metapopulations, such as our understanding of how ecological dynamics occurring on a network can be analyzed using the Laplacian matrix and its associated eigenvalue spectrum. We underline the validity of Levin’s message, over 40 years later, and suggest it has ever-growing implications in a changing and increasingly fragmented world.

Keywords

Spatial structure Ecological landscape Stability Persistence Coexistence Networks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Alan Hastings for enlightening conversations that led to the conception of this paper and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions. We dedicate this paper to the memory of Alan Turing, whose transformative work still has, more than half a century later, profound implications for myriad scientific disciplines. Turing endured the intolerance of many of his contemporaries, which preferred to condemn a brilliant scientist and war hero to the uttermost ignominy than accepting him for who he was. We are also indebted to Kevin, whose stubbornness makes studying movement in space all the more interesting.

References

  1. Abrams PA (2007) Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements. Am Nat 169:581–594.  https://doi.org/10.1086/512688 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Albouy C, Velez L, Coll M, Colloca F, le Loc'h F, Mouillot D, Gravel D (2014) From projected species distribution to food-web structure under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 20:730–741.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12467 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allesina S, Tang S (2012) Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483:205–208.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10832 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amarasekare P (2003) Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol Lett 6:1109–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amarasekare P (2008) Spatial dynamics of foodwebs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:479–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amarasekare P, Hoopes MF, Mouquet N, Holyoak M (2004) Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities. Am Nat 164:310–326.  https://doi.org/10.1086/422858 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Amarasekare P, Nisbet RM (2001) Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. Am Nat 158:572–584.  https://doi.org/10.1086/323586 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson SC, Jonathan WM, Michelle MM et al (2015) Portfolio conservation of metapopulations under climate change. Ecol Appl 25:559–572.  https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0266.1.sm CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (80- ) 286:509–512.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Vespignani A (2008) Dynamical processes on complex networksGoogle Scholar
  11. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ (2002) Spatial structure and dynamics in a marine food web. Habitat, In, pp 19–24Google Scholar
  12. Baurmann M, Gross T, Feudel U (2007) Instabilities in spatially extended predator-prey systems: spatio-temporal patterns in the neighborhood of Turing-Hopf bifurcations. J Theor Biol 245:220–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Berkeley SA, Hixon MA, Larson RJ, Love MS (2004) Fisheries sustainability via protection of age structure and spatial distribution of fish populations. www.fisheries.org 23–32
  14. Biek R, Real LA (2010) The landscape genetics of infectious disease emergence and spread. Mol Ecol 19:3515–3531.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04679.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonsall MB, Bull JC, Pickup NJ, Hassell MP (2005) Indirect effects and spatial scaling affect the persistence of multispecies metapopulations. Proc Biol Sci 272:1465–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Boulangeat I, Gravel D, Thuiller W (2012) Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. Ecol Lett 15:584–593.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01772.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowman GC, Harris LD (1980) Effect of spatial heterogeneity on ground-nesting predation. J Wildl Manag 44:806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brotons L, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Hirzel AH (2004) Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography (Cop) 27:437–448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03764.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carlsson-Granér U, Thrall PH (2015) Host resistance and pathogen infectivity in host populations with varying connectivity. Evolution (N Y) 69:926–938.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carrara F, Altermatt F, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rinaldo A (2012) Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5761–5766.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119651109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Chisholm C, Gonzalez A (2010) Metacommunity diversity depends on connectivity and patch arrangement in heterogeneous habitat networks. Ecography (Cop) 34:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06588.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2001) Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology 82:3295–3308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cody I (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Behav Mar Anim 2:69–112.  https://doi.org/10.1038/134152a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen JE (1970) A Markov contingency table model for replicated Lotka-Volterra systems near equilibrium. Am Nat 104:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Souza MB Jr, Ferreira FF, De Oliveira VM (2014) Effects of the spatial heterogeneity on the diversity of ecosystems with resource competition. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 393:312–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.08.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2003) Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259–264.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01274 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Earn DJD (2000) Coherence and conservation. Science (80- ) 290:1360–1364.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fagan WF, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. Am Nat 153:165–182.  https://doi.org/10.1086/303162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fanelli D, Cianci C, Di Patti F (2013) Turing instabilities in reaction-diffusion systems with cross diffusion. Eur Phys J B 86.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30649-7
  30. Friedman B (1956) An abstract formulation of the method of separation of variables. In: Diaz JB, Payne LE (eds) Proceedings of the conference on differential equations. University of Maryland Bookstore, College Park, MD, pp 209–226Google Scholar
  31. Fronhofer EA, Altermatt F (2017) Classical metapopulation dynamics and eco-evolutionary feedbacks in dendritic networks. Ecography (Cop) 40:1455–1466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gandon S, Nuismer SL (2009) Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. Am Nat 173:212–224.  https://doi.org/10.1086/593706 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibert JP (2016) The effect of phenotypic variation on metapopulation persistence. Popul Ecol 58:345–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-016-0548-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibert JP, Pires MM, Thompson JN, Guimarães PR Jr (2013) The spatial structure of antagonistic species affects coevolution in predictable ways. Am Nat 182:578–591.  https://doi.org/10.1086/673257 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilarranz LJ, Hastings A, Bascompte J (2014) Inferring topology from dynamics in spatial networks. Theor Ecol 8:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-014-0231-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gilpin M, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  37. Gomulkiewicz R, Thompson JN, Holt RD, Nuismer SL, Hochberg ME (2000) Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Am Nat 156:156–174.  https://doi.org/10.1086/303382 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gotelli NJ (1991) Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the core-satellite. Am Nat 138:768–776.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2678832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gravel D, Canard E, Guichard F, Mouquet N (2011) Persistence increases with diversity and connectance in trophic metacommunities. PLoS One 6:e19374.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019374 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Gravel D, Massol F, Leibold MA (2016) Stability and complexity in model meta-ecosystems. Nat Commun 7:12457.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1978.4309856 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Greischar MA, Koskella B (2007) A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation. Ecol Lett 10:418–434.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01028.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1975) The regulation of inhomogeneous populations. J Theor Biol 52:441–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90011-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90061-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Hanski I, Mononen T (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecol Lett 14:1025–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01671.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Hassell MP, May RM (1974) Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J Anim Ecol 43:567.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hassell MP, May RM, Pacala SW, Chesson PL (1991) The persistence of host-parasitoid associations in patchy environments. I. A general criterion. Am Nat 138:568–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hastings A (1977) Spatial heterogeneity and the stability. Theor Popul Bol 12:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hastings A (1980) Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor Popul Biol 18:363–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(80)90059-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hastings A (1992) Age dependent dispersal is not a simple process: density dependence, stability, and chaos. Theor Popul Biol 41:388–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hirzel AH, Helfer V, Metral F (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol Model 145:111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00396-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G (2008) Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol 45:1372–1381.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holdenrieder O, Pautasso M, Weisberg PJ, Lonsdale D (2004) Tree diseases and landscape processes: the challenge of landscape pathology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Holland MD, Hastings A (2008) Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics. Nature 456:792–794.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07395 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Holmes EE, Lewis MA, Banks JE, Veit RR (1994) Partial differential equations in ecology: spatial interactions and populations dynamics. Ecology 75:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am Nat 124:377–406.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284280 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Horn HS, MacArthur RH (1972) Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53:749–752.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1934797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krause J, Tegeder RW (1994) The mechanism of aggregation behaviour in fish shoals: individuals minimize approach time to neighbours. Anim Behav 48:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Law R, Murrell DJ, Dieckmann U (2003) Population growth in space and time: spatial logistic equations. Ecology 84:252–262. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0252:PGISAT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N et al (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Levin SA (1974) Dispersion and population interactions. Am Nat 108:207–228.  https://doi.org/10.1086/282900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levin SA (1994) Patchiness in marine and terrestrial systems: from individuals to populations. Phil Trans R Soc L B 343:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levin SA, Pimentel D (1981) Selection of intermediate rates of increase in parasite-host systems. Am Nat 117:308–315.  https://doi.org/10.1086/283708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and gentic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
  65. Levins R, Culver D (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 68:1246–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.68.6.1246 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lewis MA, Murray JD (1993) Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions. Nature 366:738–740.  https://doi.org/10.1038/366738a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Levin SA (1992) The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology 73:1943.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447
  68. Loreau M, de Mazancourt C (2008) Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. Am Nat 172:E48–E66.  https://doi.org/10.1086/589746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Loreau M, Mouquet N, Holt RD (2003) Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecol Lett 6:673–679.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00483.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. MacArthur RH, Levins R (1964) Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 51:1207–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.51.6.1207 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  72. Massol F, Gravel D, Mouquet N, Cadotte MW, Fukami T, Leibold MA (2011) Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecol Lett 14:313–323.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01588.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. May F, Wiegand T, Lehmann S, Huth A (2016) Do abundance distributions and species aggregation correctly predict macroecological biodiversity patterns in tropical forests? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:575–585.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12438 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. May RM (1972) Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238:413–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35012234 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. McCann KS, Rasmussen JB, Umbanhowar J (2005) The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol Lett 8:513–523.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. McKenzie HW, Merrill EH, Spiteri RJ, Lewis MA (2012) How linear features alter predator movement and the functional response. Interface Focus 2:205–216.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Mimura M, Murray JD (1978) On a diffusive prey-predator model which exhibits patchiness. J Theor Biol 75:249–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(78)90332-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Moore JW, Beakes MP, Nesbitt HK, Yeakel JD, Patterson DA, Thompson LA, Phillis CC, Braun DC, Favaro C, Scott D, Carr-Harris C, Atlas WI (2015) Emergent stability in a large, free-flowing watershed. Ecology 96:340–347.  https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0326.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Moore JW, Mcclure M, Rogers LA, Schindler DE (2010) Synchronization and portfolio performance of threatened salmon. Conserv Lett 3:340–348.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00119.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morris WF (1993) Predicting the consequence of plant spacing and biased movement for pollen dispersal by honey bees. Ecology 74:493–500.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1939310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nakao H, Mikhailov AS (2010) Turing patterns in network-organized activator–inhibitor systems. Nat Phys 6:544–550.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Navarro J, Votier SC, Aguzzi J, Chiesa JJ, Forero MG, Phillips RA (2013) Ecological segregation in space, time and trophic niche of sympatric planktivorous petrels. PLoS One 8:e62897.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062897 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Novak M, Moore JW, R a L (2011) Nestedness patterns and the dual nature of community reassembly in California streams: a multivariate permutation-based approach. Glob Chang Biol 17:3714–3723.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02482.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nuismer SL (2006) Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nuismer SL, Thompson JN, Gomulkiewicz R (1999) Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 266:605–609.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nuismer SL, Thompson JN, Gomulkiewicz R (2000) Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution (N Y) 54:1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1102:CCASM]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nuismer SL, Thompson JN, Gomulkiewicz R (2003) Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges. J Evol Biol 16:1337–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00609.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Okubo A, Levin SA (2001) Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Othmer HG, Scriven LE (1971) Instability and dynamic pattern in cellular networks. J Theor Biol 32:507–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90154-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Penczykowski RM, Laine AL, Koskella B (2016) Understanding the ecology and evolution of host-parasite interactions across scales. Evol Appl 9:37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12294 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Pillai P, Gonzalez A, Loreau M (2011) Metacommunity theory explains the emergence of food web complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19293–19298.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106235108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Pillai P, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2010) A patch-dynamic framework for food web metacommunities. Theor Ecol 3:223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-009-0065-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Potts JR, Hillen T, Lewis MA (2016) The “edge effect” phenomenon: deriving population abundance patterns from individual animal movement decisions. Theor Ecol 9:233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-015-0283-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Raimundo RLG, Gibert JP, Hembry DH, Guimarães PR Jr (2014) Conflicting selection in the course of adaptive diversification: the interplay between mutualism and intraspecific competition. Am Nat 183:363–375.  https://doi.org/10.1086/674965 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Recher HF (1966) Some aspects of the ecology of migrant shorebirds. Ecology 47:393–407.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1932979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rooney N, McCann KS (2011) Integrating food web diversity, structure and stability. Trends Ecol Evol 27:40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1936707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schindler DE, Armstrong JB, Reed TE (2015) The portfolio concept in ecology and evolution. Front Ecol Environ 13:257–263.  https://doi.org/10.1890/140275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schindler DE, Hilborn R, Chasco B, Boatright CP, Quinn TP, Rogers LA, Webster MS (2010) Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465:609–612.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Schnell JK, Harris GM, Pimm SL, Russell GJ (2013) Estimating extinction risk with metapopulation models of large-scale fragmentation. Conserv Biol 27:520–530.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12047 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stachowicz JJ (2001) Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities: positive interactions play a critical, but underappreciated, role in ecological communities by reducing physical or biotic stresses in existing habitats and by creating new habitats on which many species depend. Bioscience 51:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0235:mfatso]2.0.co;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Terui A, Ishiyama N, Urabe H, Ono S, Finlay JC, Nakamura F (2018) Metapopulation stability in branching river networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E5963–E5969.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800060115 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Thiebot JB, Cherel Y, Trathan PN, Bost CA (2012) Coexistence of oceanic predators on wintering areas explained by population-scale foraging segregation in space or time. Ecology 93:122–130.  https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0385.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Thuiller W, Brotons L, Araujo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current\rand future species distributions. Ecography (Cop) 27(2):165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1939377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tilman D, Kareiva P (1997) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  110. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Turchin P, Batzli GO (2001) Availability of food and the population dynamics of arvicoline rodents. Ecology 82:1521–1534. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1521:AOFATP]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 237:37–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. White KAJ, Murray JD, Lewis MA (1996) Wolf-deer interactions: a mathematical model. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 263:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Yeakel JD, Gibert JP, Gross T, Westley PAH, Moore JW (2018) Eco-evolutionary dynamics, density-dependent dispersal and collective behaviour: implications for salmon metapopulation robustness. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 373:20170018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Yeakel JD, Moore JW, Guimarães PR, de Aguiar MAM (2014) Synchronisation and stability in river metapopulation networks. Ecol Lett 17:273–283.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12228 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural SciencesThe University of California, MercedMercedUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations