Temporal Encoding During Unimodal and Bimodal Odor Processing in the Human Brain
In daily life, people encounter a wide range of odors, most of which contain multiple chemical substances. So-called bimodal odors stimulate both the olfactory and trigeminal nerve, and the interaction between these two systems shapes the perception of the odor. However, temporal encoding of these sensory systems during bimodal odor processing has received limited scientific attention.
To investigate this, we recorded the electrophysiological response in 17 participants to relatively unimodal olfactory (strawberry), trigeminal (l-isopulegol) and strongly bimodal (strawberry and l-isopulegol) stimuli.
ERP amplitudes and intensity ratings were significantly bigger for bimodal stimulation, as compared to unimodal stimulations. No significant difference was observed between N1 and P2 response latencies to olfactory and bimodal stimuli while responses to both stimuli showed longer latencies compared to the response of the trigeminal stimulus.
Results provide further evidence of interaction between olfactory and trigeminal systems; additional activation of the olfactory system results in more vigorous electrophysiological responses and the experience of higher intensity. In addition, results indicate that the trigeminal system is faster to react to stimulation.
The current study offers a view on the temporal processing of bimodal odorants that are most likely to be encountered in the environment. We link the more vigorous electrophysiological response to a more complex odorant with activation of different neural structures.
KeywordsOlfaction Trigeminal Bimodal odor EEG ERPs
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This work was supported by the Takasago International Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. AO was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (#626/STYP/12/2017).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
The study is performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on Biomedical Studies Involving Human Subjects.
Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. The study design and consent approach were approved by the TU Dresden Medical Faculty Ethics Review Board (EK394102014).
- Albrecht J, Kopietz R, Linn J, Sakar V, Anzinger A, Schreder T, Pollatos O, Brückmann H, Kobal G, Wiesmann M (2009) Activation of olfactory and trigeminal cortical areas following stimulation of the nasal mucosa with low concentrations of S(−)-nicotine vapor-an fMRI study on chemosensory perception. Hum Brain Mapp 30:699–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boyle JA, Frasnelli J, Gerber J, Heinke M, Hummel T (2007) Cross-modal integration of intranasal stimuli: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 149:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cain WS (1976) Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts. Sens Processes 1:57–67Google Scholar
- Cuevas I, Plaza P, Rombaux P, Mouraux A, Delbeke J, Collignon O, de Volder AG, Renier L (2011) Chemosensory event-related potentials in early blind humans. B-ENT 7:11–17Google Scholar
- Kobal G (1981) Elektrophysiologische untersuchungen des menschlichen geruchssinns. ThiemeGoogle Scholar
- Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pellegrino R, Drechsler E, Hummel C, Warr J, Hummel T (2017) Bimodal odor processing with a trigeminal component at sub- and suprathreshold levels. Neuroscience 363:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- von Skramlik E (1926) Handbuch der Physiologie der niederen Sinne. G. ThiemeGoogle Scholar
- Whitcroft KL, Aziz M, Croy I, Schriever V, Hummel T (2017) Short inter-stimulus intervals can be used for olfactory electroencephalography in patients of varying olfactory function. Neuroscience 363:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.08.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar