Advertisement

A Study on Outcome of Myringoplasty in Dry Ear (Quiescent/Inactive CSOM) Without Using Gelfoam in Middle Ear

  • Vijay RamalingamEmail author
  • Muthukumar Ramanathan
  • Amarapathy Muraleedharan
  • Kandasamy Kamindan
  • Thalapathy Ramkumar
  • Mohankumar Venugopal
  • Murugesan Rajeswari
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Myringoplasty is a common surgery done for patients with tympanic membrane perforation in our clinical practice. This study was done to know the outcome of myringoplasty done without using gelfoam as a scaffold material. Simultaneously other parameters influencing the outcome were analysed. In a total of 80 patients assessed over 25 months were divided into test and control group by quasi randomisation. All patients underwent endoscopic underlay myringoplasty. Control groups had gelfoam bed created with gelfoam, whereas the test group only middle ear air pocket created with a proper seal without using gelfoam. The study revealed that without using gelfoam and creating a good middle ear air pocket the results were comparable to the method of using middle ear gelfoam bed. Also few insights and understanding regarding the parameters we need to asses preoperatively were also observed. With comparable healing and hearing results without using gelfoam in the middle ear, the normal physiology is restored in the postoperative period much earlier. The result of the surgery also becomes evident in the second postoperative week when the use of gelfoam in the middle ear is avoided.

Keywords

Tympanic membrane Perforation Gelfoam Myringoplasty 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Glasscock & Shambaugh (2010) Textbook on surgery of the ear. Chapter 6:465–489Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fish U (1994) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 39:44–49Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ (1999) Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:530–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stage Jan et al (1992) Underlay tympanoplasty with the graft lateral to the malleus handle. Clin Otolaryngol 17:6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biswas SS et al (2010) Hearing evaluation after myringoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 16(1):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aich ML et al (2009) Outcome of myringoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 15(2):40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pignataro L, Grillo L, Berta D, Capaccio P (2001) Myringoplasty: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 115:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schuknecht HF et al (1976) Myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol I:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jang CH et al (2008) The effect of anti-adhesive packing agents in the middle ear. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 72:1603–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blaine G (1951) Absorbable gelatin sponge in experimental surgery. Lancet 2:427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Light RU, Prentice HR (1945) Gelatin sponge. Arch Surg 51:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hellstrom S et al (1983) Absorbable gelatine sponge (gelfoam) in otosurgery. One cause of undesirable postoperative results. Acta Otolaryngol 96:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh BJ et al (2009) A comparative study of different graft materials used in myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi H (2001) The middle ear: the role of ventilation in disease and surgery, 1st edn. Springer, pp 45–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ENTKMCH Institute of Health Sciences and ResearchCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of ENTTN MGR UniversityChennaiIndia
  3. 3.JIPMERPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations