Round Window Insertion in Veria Technique of Cochlear Implantation: An Essential Modification

  • Kranti BhavanaEmail author
  • Bhartendu Bharti
  • Rajesh Vishwakarma
Original Article


Cochlear implants have been done using various surgical approaches. The classical posterior tympanotomy approach has been practiced by majority of surgeons worldwide. An alternative approach is the transcanal Veria approach. This is non mastoidectomy approach where the electrode is threaded via a transcanal tunnel into the cochleostomy site. Majority of “Veria” surgeons are inserting the cochlear electrodes via a cochleostomy. This article focuses on round window insertion of cochlear electrode which has been proven to be a “softer “technique of electrode insertions and finds its role in preservation of residual hearing. Out of 115 cochlear implants done at AIIMS Patna between May 2014–May 2018, using the Veria approach, 52 patients have now been done using the round window insertion. Veria approach is a non-mastoidectomy technique where a special perforator is used to drill a trans canal tunnel which lodges the cochlear electrodes. All kind of implants were used and round window insertion was possible with different kind of electrodes. Out of 52 implants, 24 were MEDEL Sonata with straight electrode and flex soft electrode, 21 were Advanced Bionics Precurved 1 J electrode, 2 were (CI 24 REST) Cochlear devices standard straight array and 5 were Neurelec standard straight array devices. Insertion was uneventful in all the cases and intra op telemetry results were satisfactory post insertion. Round window insertion has now become routine for cochlear implants especially in cases where we have to preserve residual hearing. Veria approach earlier was considered to be only a “cochleostomy” approach but our successful insertion via the round window using the Veria technique is a landmark modification and alleviates any such limitation which was associated with this technique before.


Veria technique Cochlear implant Round window insertion Cochleostomy 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest of any author.

Ethical Clearance

Ethical clearance was taken from the Institute Ethical Committee (IEC) of AIIMS Patna.


  1. 1.
    Kiratzidis T, Arnold W, Iliades T (2002) Veria operation updated I. The trans-canal wall cochlear implantation. ORL 64:406–412. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Baumgartner WD (2002) The suprameatal approach in cochlear implant surgery: our experience with 80 patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 64(6):403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    House WF (1982) Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants: progress and perspectives. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91(Suppl 2):15–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richard C, Fayad JN, Doherty J, Linthicum FH Jr (2012) Round window vs cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histological findings. Otol Neurotol 33(7):1181–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hans JM, Prasad R (2015) Cochlear implant surgery by the Veria technique: How and why? Experience from 1400 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67(2):107–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiam NT, Limb CJ (2016) The impact of round window vs cochleostomy surgical approaches on interscalar excursions in the cochlea: preliminary results from a flat panel computed tomography study. World J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2(3):142–147Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adunka OF, Dillon MT, Adunka MC, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA (2014) Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Otol Neurotol 35(4):613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalmia D, Behera SK (2017) Significance of round window niche drilling for cochlear implant surgery. Indian J Otol 23(3):141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kranti Bhavana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bhartendu Bharti
    • 1
  • Rajesh Vishwakarma
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, PatnaPhulwarisharif, PatnaIndia
  2. 2.Department of ENTB.J. Medical CollegeAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations