Advertisement

Role of Otoacoustic Emission Test in Neonatal Screening at Tertiary Center

  • Shiv Kumar Raghuwanshi
  • Aditya GargavaEmail author
  • Vikram Kulkarani
  • Ajit Kumar
Original Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

To study the role of Otoacoustic emission test in neonatal screening at tertiary center. The study was conducted in the ENT department of LN medical college and JK hospital Bhopal (M.P) as a territory center between 2015 and 2017 were 1250 newborns were screened with Otoacoustic emission test with portable Interacoustics OAE DK-5610 assens an routine screening investigation. In our study a multistep screening with OAE was done, 1250 newborns (659 boys and 591 girls) were assessed. In our study we have found that OAE has 66.7% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity in diagnosis of neonatal hearing impairment. Its positive and negative predictive value was 33.3% and 99.7% respectively. It is essential to examine the generalized development of newborns by identifying hearing loss at birth and providing a screening test for assessment of them. 1250 newborns were assessed we compared the results of OAE (screening test) with the results of ABR (diagnostic test) and found sensitivity of OAE to be 66.7% and its specificity 98.8%. We conclude from these results that OAE is a good screening test for hearing loss of neonates, but the results must be confirmed with BERA test.

Keywords

Auditory brainstem response Distortion-product otoacoustic emission Neonate Sensitivity Specificity Universal hearing screening 

Abbreviations

ABR

Auditory brainstem responses

OAE

Otoacoustic emissions

Notes

Funding

This study is not funded by any source and conducted in ENT department of LN medical college, Bhopal MP.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kamal N (2013) Newborn hearing screening: opportunities and challenges. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 14(2):55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cavalcante JMS, Isaac MDL (2013) Analysis of otoacoustic emissions in neonates at term and preterm. Brazil J Otorhinolaryngol 79(5):582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barsky-Firkser L, Sun S (1997) Universal newborn hearing screenings: a three-year experience. Pediatrics 99(6):133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finitzo T, Crumley WG (1999) The role of the pediatrician in hearing loss from detection to connection. Pediatr Clin N Am 9(10):15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Straaten HL, Tibosch CH, Dorrepaal C, Dekker FW, Kok JH (2001) Efficacy of automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening in very preterm newborns. J Pediatr 138:674–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lotfi Y, Movallali G (2007) A universal newborn hearing screening in Iran. Iran Rehabil J 5(5–6):8–11Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taghdiri M, Eghbalian F, Emami F et al (2008) Auditory evaluation of high risk newborns by automated auditory brain stem response. Iran J Pediatr 18(4):330–334Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wrightson AS (2007) Universal newborn hearing screening. Am Fam Physician 75(9):1349–1352Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Michele AM, Ruth RA (2010). Newborn hearing screening. http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic576.htm. Accessed 15 Jun 2010
  10. 10.
    Ghasemi MM, Zamanian A, Tale MR et al (2006) Neonatal hearing screening with TEOAE in mashhad city. Iran. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 18(1):15–21 (in Persian) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ENT, Fellowship in otology (MUHS)Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government Medical CollegeVidishaIndia

Personalised recommendations