Advertisement

Outcome Analysis of Microlaryngeal Surgery for Benign Lesions of Vocal Cord Using Videostroboscopy and Voice Handicap Index

  • Veena MobarsaEmail author
  • Sunil K. Samdani
  • Vishram Singh Gurjar
Original Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Benign vocal cord mass lesions are common causes of dysphonia which are often surgically correctable. They include lesions like vocal polyps, vocal cysts, vocal nodules and Reinke’s edema. A prospective study of 30 patients was carried out at SMS medical college and hospital between April 2014 to November 2015 after institutional ethical committee clearance. The purpose of our study was to evaluate outcome of microlaryngeal surgery for benign lesions of vocal cord using videostroboscopy and voice handicap index. All cases between the age group 15–60 years with clinical evidence of benign lesions of vocal cord were included in study. Preoperative amplitude, mucosal wave, glottic closure was seen by videostroboscopy and subjective assessment of severity of handicap in voice was assessed by set of questionnaire using voice handicap index (Jacobson et al. in Am J Speech Lang Pathol 6: 66–70, 1997). Postoperative follow up was done at 3rd week and 10th week, and outcome of microlaryngeal surgery was assessed using videostroboscope and voice handicap index. At the end of study data was compiled systemically and analysed using paired ‘t’ test and Chi square test. Our study observed statistically significant improvement in amplitude and mucosal wave and glottic closure. Subjective improvement in perception of severity of handicap in voice was analysed by voice handicap index which shows statistically significant data. Overall our study conclude microlaryngeal surgery as an effective way for improvement in speech parameters, that can be assessed by use of videostroboscopy and voice handicap index.

Keywords

Benign lesions Videostroboscopy Micro-laryngeal surgery Voice handicap index 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gray SD, Hammond E, Hanson DF (1995) Benign pathologic responses of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Remacle M, Degols JC, Delos M (1996) Exudative lesions of Reinke’s space: an anatomopathological correlation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 50(4):253–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verdolini K, Rosen C, Branski R (2006) Classification manual for voice disorders. Psychology Press, East SussexGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scalco AN, Shipman WF, Tabb HG (1960) Microscopic suspension laryngoscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 69:1134–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courey MS, Gardner GM, Stone RE, Ossoff RH (1995) Endoscopic vocal fold microflap: a three-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104(4 Pt 1):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ford CN (1999) Advances and refinements in phonosurgery. Laryngoscope 109(12):1891–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sataloff RT, Spiegel JR, Heuer RJ, Baroody MM, Emerich KA, Hawkshaw MJ et al (1995) Laryngeal mini-microflap: a new technique and reassessment of the microflap saga. J Voice 9(2):198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colton RH, Woo P, Brewer DW, Griffin B, Casper J (1995) Stroboscopic signs associated with benign lesions of the vocal folds. J Voice 9:312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosen CA (2005) Stroboscopy as a research instrument: development of a perceptual evaluation tool. Laryngoscope 115:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehta DD, Hillman RE (2012) Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yelken K, Gultekin E, Guven M, Eyibilen A, Aladag I (2010) Impairment of voice quality in paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction. J Voice 24:724–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woo P (2014) Objective measures of laryngeal imaging: what have we learned since Dr. Paul Moore. J Voice 28:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bless DM, Swift E (1996) Stroboscopy: new diagnostic techniques and applied Physiology. In: Fried MP (ed) The Larynx a multidisciplinary approach, 2nd edn. Mosby-Year Book, Inc, St. Louis, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Djukic V, Milovanovic J, Jotic AD, Vukasinovic M (2014) Stroboscopy in detection of laryngeal dysplasia effectiveness and limitations. J Voice 28:262.e13–262.e21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS et al (1997) The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 6:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, Mackenzie K, Deary IJ (2004) Voice symptom scale and the voice handicap index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol 29:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deary IJ, Webb A, MacKenzie K, Wilson JA, Carding PN (2004) Short, self-report voice symptom scales: psychometric characteristics of the voice handicap index-10 and the vocal performance questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 31:232–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loughran S, Calder N, MacGregor FB, Carding P, MacKenzie K (2005) Quality of life and voice following endoscopic resection or radiotherapy for early glottic cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 30:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas G, Mathew SS, Chrysolyte SB, Rupa V (2007) Indian journal otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg 59:336–340Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharma K (2013) Acostic and perceptual measures of voice pre and post phonomicrosurgery. Soc Otorhinol Nepal 4:1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Durand BA (2008) Vocal fold vibratory characteristics pre and post phonosurgery investigated by stroboscopyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheng J, Woo P (2010) Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index and voice laboratory measurements after phonosurgery. Ear Nose Throat J 89(4):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sovani P, Keer V, Jaiish SM (2007) Correlation of voice handicap index scores with client perceptions of severity in males v/s females with voice disorderGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veena Mobarsa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sunil K. Samdani
    • 1
  • Vishram Singh Gurjar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ENTSMS Medical CollegeJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations