M.ALSHEIKH Technique: Modification to the Soft Tissue Reduction in the Baha® Attract Surgery

  • Mohammed AlShaikh
  • Osama MajdalawiehEmail author
  • Alhussain Kullab
Original Article


To describe a modification to the Baha® Attract surgical technique that aims to enhance skin closure, create smooth skin across the surface of the wound, reduce surgery time, and improve cosmetics of the surgical site. Retrospective chart review. Patients were implanted between 2014 and 2016 at King Fahad General Hospital (KFGH) (Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). 20 adult patients (11 males, 9 females), all eligible for Baha® Attract system. One patient only had a previous Baha® surgery. The normal Baha® Attract surgical technique with modification to the soft tissue reduction stage is described. The mean surgical time was 35.25 min (range 25–55). Bleeding was present but not significant and easily controlled in four patients. All patients received the 4 mm implant. None of the patients experienced severe pain. The postoperative follow-up period was 6 months for 7 patients and 8 months for 13 patients. Patient feedback and monitoring indicates a good hearing performance and comfort in all patients. The modified Baha® Attract surgical method causes less postoperative complication, improve cosmetic effect, and provide shorter operative time compared to the conventional Attract procedure.


Baha Surgical technique Bone conduction Osseointegration Baha® Attract 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Directorate of Health Affairs, National Committee of Medical and Bioethics, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Informed Consent

All subjects, or their legal guardian, had previously granted consent to the use of relevant data.


  1. 1.
    Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW et al (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 195:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Wolf MJ, Shival ML, Hol MK et al (2010) Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users. Otol Neurotol 31:766–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McDermott AL, Williams J, Kuo M et al (2009) The Birmingham pediatric bone-anchored hearing aid program: a 15-year experience. Otol Neurotol 30:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saliba I, Woods O, Caron C (2010) BAHA results in children at one year follow-up: a prospective longitudinal study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:1058–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desmet J, Bouzegta R, Hofkens A et al (2012) Clinical need for a BAHA trial in patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Analysis of a BAHA database of 196 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:799–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burkey JM, Berenholz LP, Lippy WH (2006) Latent demand for the bone anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience. Otol Neurotol 27:648–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersen HT, SchrLder SA, Bonding P (2006) Unilateral deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery: subjective hearing handicap and the effect of the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 27:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hol MK, Nelissen RC, Agterberg MJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2013) Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant. Otol Neurotol 34:1071–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mulla O, Agada F, Reilly PG (2012) Introducing the Sophono Alpha 1 abutment free bone conduction hearing system. Clin Otolaryngol 37:168–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegert R, Kanderske J (2013) A new semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device: clinical, surgical, and audiologic outcomes in patients with congenital ear canal atresia. Otol Neurotol 34:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marsella P, Scorpecci A, Dalmasso G, Pacifico C (2015) First experience in Italy with a new transcutaneous bone conduction implant. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 35(1):29–33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Işeri M, Orhan KS, Kara A, Durgut M, Oztürk M, Topdağ M, Calışkan S (2014) A new transcutaneous bone anchored hearing device—the Baha® Attract System: the first experience in Turkey. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 24(2):59–64. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2014.45143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurz A, Flynn M, Caversaccio M, Kompis M (2014) Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new Nonskin Penetrating Baha System. BioMed Res Int 2014:Article ID 416205Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M, Goycoolea M, Wigren S, Weber P, Smeds H, Flynn M, Cowan R (2015) Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol. 36(5):834–841. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000712 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clamp PJ, Briggs RJ (2015) The Cochlear Baha 4 Attract System—design concepts, surgical technique and early clinical results. Expert Rev Med Devices 12(3):223–230. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.990375(Epub 2014 Dec 12) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carr SD, Moraleda J, Procter V, Wright K, Ray J (2015) Initial UK experience with a novel magnetic transcutaneous bone conduction device. Otol Neurotol. 36(8):1399–1402. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000830 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manorama A, Meyer R, Wiseman R, Bush TR (2013) Quantifying the effects of external shear loads on arterial and venous blood flow: implications for pressure ulcer development. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28:574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raicevich G, Burwood E, Dillon H (2008) Taking the pressure off bone conduction hearing aid users. ANZJA 30:113–117Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yellin W, Roland PS, Culbertson M, Meyerhoff WL (1997) Use of an implantable hearing device. Am J Otoloaryngol 18:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENT DepartmentKing Fahad General HospitalJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Cochlear AGBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations