Does Continuing Medical Education (CME) Activity Contribute to Learning Gain: An Objective Evaluation
- 48 Downloads
Continuing medical education (CME) and work-shops go a long way to update and refresh medical education of the medical practitioners and help them to stay updated about latest advances in the medical field which helps them to impart latest and better treatment to the patients. This article aims at reporting the evaluation of the effectiveness of the learning in terms of knowledge gained immediately after the workshop and to objectively quantify the knowledge gain from the CME program. Pre- and post-CME survey of knowledge by the way of multiple choice question questionnaire was used to assess the efficacy of the CME and the learning gain of the participants. 42 participants were included in the assessment of the gain in knowledge after the CME. An increase of 17.9% in the scores of the participants was seen at the end of the CME, with a learning gain of 38%. Educational activity like CME can improve the knowledge base of the intended participants. Further research is required to evaluate if education delivered in a short workshop of this nature is retained for any length of time and if it results in any change in practice that affects health outcomes.
KeywordsContinuing medical education (CME) Learning gain Assessment Knowledge
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.American Academy of Family Practice. CME requirements for members. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/cme/cmea/cmerequirements.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2014
- 3.American Medical Association. House of delegates policy #300.988. Restoring Integrity to Continuing Medical Education. http://www.amaassn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink&doc=policyfiles/HnE/H300.988.HTM&s_t=300.988&catg=AMA/HnE&catg=AMA/BnGnC&catg=AMA/DIR&&nth=1&&st_p=0&nth=1&. Accessed 11 Nov 2014
- 9.Thomson O, Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J (2001) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003030Google Scholar
- 10.Hake RR (2008) Design-based research in physics education research: a review. In: Kelly AE, Lesh RA, Baek JY (eds) A handbook of design research methods in education: innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Beaulieu M, Choquette D, Rahme E, Bessette L, Carrier R (2004) CURATA: a patient health management program for the treatment of osteoarthritis in Quebec; an integrated approach to improving the appropriate utilization of anti-inflammatory/analgesic medications. Am J Manag Care 10:569–575Google Scholar
- 12.Cohn BA, Wingard DL, Patterson RC, McPhee SJ, Gerbert B (2002) The National DES Education Program: effectiveness of the California Health Provider Intervention. J Cancer Educ 17:40–45Google Scholar
- 17.Harris JM Jr, Kutob RM, Surprenant ZJ, Maiuro RD, Delate TA (2002) Can Internet based education improve physician confidence in dealing with domestic violence? Fam Med 34:287–292Google Scholar
- 22.Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O’Brien MA, Wolf F et al (2009) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2):CD003030Google Scholar