Advertisement

Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 567–586 | Cite as

Accessibility and Spatial Inequalities in Greece

  • George PanagiotopoulosEmail author
  • Dimitris Kaliampakos
Article
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

Accessibility suggests a major issue in rural areas. Remoteness or inaccessibility is known to amplify rural deprivation and suspend sustainable regional development. Many rural areas in Greece suffer from remoteness mainly because of a varying and continuously alternating terrain. A diverse space is shaped by more than 70% mountain areas, hundreds of inhabited islands in an insular area almost the size of the mainland and intense variation in population distribution between the large urban agglomerations and the periphery. In this paper, a geographical remoteness index for Greece is presented that can capture the required scale of analysis and the distinct characteristics of Greek space. The index is localized and evaluated using empirical and theoretical methods and several demographic and network geostatistics. Finally, we examine the relationship of the index and critical socioeconomic variables in order to associate accessibility with spatial inequalities. Spatial regression models are used that uncover the impact of remoteness in certain key development aspects, namely economy, human capital and infrastructures. Potentially, accessibility may be used as an evaluation tool to redirect policies for spatial equity.

Keywords

Remoteness Accessibility Spatial equity Spatial regression Greece 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anselin, L., Syabri, I., & Kho, Y. (2010). GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Handbook of applied spatial analysis, 73–89.Google Scholar
  2. Calver, J., Preen, D., Bulsara, M., & Sanfilippo, F. (2007). Stimulant prescribing for the treatment of ADHD in Western Australia: socioeconomic and remoteness differences. Medical Journal of Australia, 186(3), 124.Google Scholar
  3. Caschili, S., De Montis, A., & Trogu, D. (2015). Accessibility and rurality indicators for regional development. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi, G., & Zhu, J. (2008). Spatial regression models for demographic analysis. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(1), 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coccossis, H. (2001). Sustainable development of the Greek Islands. Options Méditerranées, Serie A (44), 391–394.Google Scholar
  6. Copus, A. K. (2001). From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies, 9(4), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EC (2011). Exploring the potential of maritime spatial planning in the Mediterranean—Country Report: Greece. European Commission study. European Commission DG Fisheries and Maritime Affairs: European Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Eckert, K. A., Taylor, A. W., & Wilkinson, D. (2004). Does health service utilisation vary by remoteness? South Australian population data and the accessibility and remoteness index of Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 28(5), 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EL.STAT. (2016a). Households, households with/without internet connection (2011 Census). Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL.STAT.). Accessed September, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. EL.STAT. (2016b). Population by sex, age groups and place of birth (2011 Census). Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL.STAT.). Accessed September, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. EL.STAT. (2017). Population by place of permanent residence and level of education (2011 Census). Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL.STAT.). Accessed April, 2017.Google Scholar
  12. EuroGlobalMap 1:1 million scale topographic dataset (2015). EuroGeographics. http://www.eurogeographics.org/products-and-services/euroglobalmap. Accessed April, 2016.
  13. Eurostat (2016). Urban-rural typology. eurostat statistics explained: Statistical office of the european communities.Google Scholar
  14. Farmer, J. C., Baird, A. G., & Iversen, L. (2001). Rural deprivation: reflecting reality. The British Journal of General Practice, 51(467), 486–491.Google Scholar
  15. Farrington, J. H. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuel prices of unleaded95 and heating oil, 2012 (2012). Ministry of finance, Development and Tourism. http://www.fuelprices.gr/. Accessed May, 2016.
  17. GEOSTAT 2011 1km2 population grid (2012). The European Forum for GeoStatistics-Statistical Office of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  18. Geurs, K. T., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glover, J. D., & Tennant, S. K. (2003). Remote areas statistical geography in Australia: notes on the Accessibility/Remoteness Index for Australia (ARIA+ version): Public Health Information Development Unit, the University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  20. Guagliardo, M. F. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hastaoglou, V., Hadjimichalis, C., Kalogirou, N., & Papamichos, N. (1987). Urbanisation, crisis and urban policy in Greece. Antipode, 19(2), 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heatlh Map of Greece (2008). Hellenic center for disease control & prevention (HCDCP) - ministry of health. http://ygeiamap.gov.gr. Accessed June, 2016.
  24. Higgs, G., & White, S. (2000). Alternatives to census-based indicators of social disadvantage in rural communities. Progress in Planning, 53(1), 1–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(99)00021-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoggart, K., Black, R., & Buller, H. (2014). Rural Europe: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kizos, T. (2007). Island lifestyles in the Aegean Islands, Greece: heaven in summer, hell in winter? In Seasonal landscapes (pp. 127–149): Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Kwan, M. P. (1998). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Labrianidis, L. (2006). Human capital as the critical factor for the development of Europe’s rural peripheral areas (pp. 41–59). The New European Rurality: Strategies for Small Firms.Google Scholar
  29. Li, P., & Lu, Y. (2005). Review and prospectation of accessibility research. Progress in Geography, 3, 009.Google Scholar
  30. McNamara, B., & Rosenwax, L. (2007). Factors affecting place of death in Western Australia. Health & Place, 13(2), 356–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moran, P. A. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray, G., Judd, F., Jackson, H., Fraser, C., Komiti, A., Hodgins, G., et al. (2004). Rurality and mental health: the role of accessibility. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(8), 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, G., Judd, F., Jackson, H., Fraser, C., Komiti, A., Hodgins, G., et al. (2005). The five factor model and accessibility/remoteness: Novel evidence for person–environment interaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(4), 715–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nordregio (2004). Mountain areas in Europe: analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European countries. Nordregio Report (pp. 271).Google Scholar
  35. Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Panebianco, S., & Schürmann, C. (2002). The Egnatia Motorway–a chance for Northern Greece to catch up. In 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association, (Vol. 2731).Google Scholar
  37. Pirie, G. H. (1979). Measuring accessibility: a review and proposal. Environment and Planning A, 11(3), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pooler, J. (1987). Measuring geographical accessibility: a review of current approaches and problems in the use of population potentials. Geoforum, 18(3), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poulos, R. G., Hayen, A., Chong, S. S., & Finch, C. F. (2009). Geographic mapping as a tool for identifying communities at high risk of fire and burn injuries in children. Burns, 35(3), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Road Network Planning Administration (2015). National road network of Greece. Athens: General Secretary of Infrastructures, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks.Google Scholar
  41. Saitis, C., & Saiti, A. (2004). School libraries in Greece: A comparative study of public primary schools in rural and urban areas. Library & Information Science Research, 26(2), 201–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2003.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schürmann, C., & Talaat, A. (2002). The European peripherality index. In 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Dortmund,(pp. 27–31).Google Scholar
  43. Skuras, D., Dimara, E., & Vakrou, A. (2000). The day after grant-aid: business development schemes for small rural firms in lagging areas of Greece. Small Business Economics, 14(2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spiekermann, K., & Neubauer, J. (2002). European accessibility and peripherality: Concepts, models and indicators.Google Scholar
  45. Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (2006). Accessibility and spatial development in Europe. Scienze Regionali, 5(2), 15–46.Google Scholar
  46. Spilanis, I., Kizos, T., & Petsioti, P. (2012). Accessibility of peripheral regions: evidence from Aegean islands (Greece). Island Studies Journal, 7(2), 199–214.Google Scholar
  47. Statistical report of tax data 2011 (2011). General secretary of information systems, Ministry of Finance, Greece. http://www.gsis.gr/gsis/info/gsis_site/PublicIssue/Statistics.html. Accessed November, 2016.
  48. Straatemeier, T., & Bertolini, L. (2008). Joint accessibility design: Framework developed with practitioners to integrate land use and transport planning in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trewin, D. (2001). ABS views on remoteness. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  50. Van Wee, B. (2016). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vandenbulcke, G., Steenberghen, T., & Thomas, I. (2009). Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning? Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagstaff, P. (1999). Regionalism in the European Union: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  53. Waldorf, B. (2006). A continuous multi-dimensional measure of rurality: Moving beyond threshold measures. Selected Paper, Annual Meetings AAEA, Long Beach, CA, July 2006.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, F. (2012). Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility: a methodological review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 1104–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wee, B., & Geurs, K. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4).Google Scholar
  56. Zilkens, R. R., Spilsbury, K., Bruce, D. G., & Semmens, J. B. (2009). Clinical epidemiology and in-patient hospital use in the last year of life (1990–2005) of 29,884 Western Australians with dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 17(2), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metsovio Interdisciplinary Research CenterNational Technical University of AthensZografouGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Mining & Environmental Technology, School of Mining and Metallurgical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensZografouGreece

Personalised recommendations