Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Values Compatibility Analysis: Using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) for Decision Support in National Forest Management

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human values are embedded in forest management decisions but are rarely systematically and explicitly included in the decision process. National legislation for public lands often provides conflicting goals but little guidance for agencies such as the U.S. Forest Service to operationalize public value preferences. The historical difficulty of integrating public values into forest management decisions includes the problems of measurement, aggregation, and tradeoff analysis. In this paper, we present a method for measuring and integrating spatially-explicit public values collected using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) into a decision support framework we call values compatibility analysis (VCA). We provide a case study to demonstrate how spatially-explicit public values can be used to determine the compatibility of designating ATV/OHV routes on national forest land. The applications and limitations of VCA for decision support are elaborated and we conclude that an effective decision support framework should provide some degree of standardization, be broadly inclusive, and provide the opportunity to engage in systematic place-based value trade-off analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessa, N., Kliskey, A., & Brown, G. (2008). Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beierle, T. (1999). Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Studies Review, 16, 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengston, D., & Xu, Z. (1995). Changing national forest values: A content analysis. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-323. 29 p

  • Beverly, J., Uto, K., Wilkes, J., & Bothwell, P. (2008). Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. doi:10.1139/X07-149.

  • Brown, T. C. (1984). The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics, 60(3), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2003). A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(4), 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2005). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources, 18(1), 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2006). Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2008). A theory of urban park geography. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(4), 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (in press). Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal.

  • Brown, G., & Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Towards mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2000). Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 46(2), 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2009). Public participation GIS: A method for national forest planning. Forest Science, 55(2), 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public participation GIS: A new method for use in national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Reed, P., & Harris, C. C. (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography, 22, 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Smith, C., Alessa, L., & Kliskey, A. (2004). A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography, 24(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. M., & Cheng, A. S. (2011). Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography, 31, 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, B. (2006). The national environmental policy act’s influence on USDA forest service decision-making, 1974–1996. Journal of Forest Economics, 12(2), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R., Valliere, W., & Minteer, B. (1999). Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management: An empirical study. Society and Natural Resources, 12(5), 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Pincus, M. (2011). Mapping a values typology in three counties of the Interior Northwest, USA: Scale, geographic associations among values, and the use of intensity weights. Society and Natural Resources, 24(6), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C., & Brown, G. (2007). A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes toward tourism growth and development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(5), 520–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C., and Brown, G. (2010). Assessing spatial associations between perceptions of landscape value and climate change risk for use in climate change planning. Climatic Change. Online First. Available from http://www.springerlink.com/content/100247 [Accessed 25 July 2010].

  • Rolston, H., & Coufal, J. (1991). A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. Journal of Forestry, 89(4), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslton, H. (1988). Environmental ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki, D., & Peterman, D. (2002). Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. M. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 17–36). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, M. A., Cordell, H. K., & Green, G. T. (2003). PVF: A scale to measure public values of forests. Journal of Forestry, 101, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Pfueller, S., & Whitelaw, P. (2010). Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management, 45(5), 896–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. (1987). Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, G., Reed, P. Values Compatibility Analysis: Using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) for Decision Support in National Forest Management. Appl. Spatial Analysis 5, 317–332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x

Keywords

Navigation