Is there any association between aortic root rotation angle and aortic dissection?

  • Maryam MoradiEmail author
  • Raheleh Sadat Mirfasihi
Original Article



Thoracic aortic dissection is a probable fatal condition that requires early diagnosis and management. The underlying etiology of this disorder is an important issue that has not been completely responded yet. In the current study, the association between aortic root rotation and ascending aortic dissection has been assessed.


This is a non-randomized retrospective case-control study conducted on twenty-five cases referring with ascending aortic dissection and seventy-five controls that underwent computed tomography (CT) angiography for reasons other than aortic dissection. Aortic root rotation angle and aortic diameter for both cases and controls were measured and then compared.


There was no significant difference regarding age and gender distribution (P value = 0.22 and 0.38 respectively) between patients in case and control groups. The mean values of aortic root rotation angle and aortic diameter in cases were 22.5 ± 10.5° and 43.1 ± 12.5 mm versus 15.7 ± 10.7° and 30.7 ± 5.3 mm in controls (P value = 0.007 and 0.001 respectively). Direct relation was found between aortic root rotation angle and aortic diameter (P value = 0.007, r = 0.276). Mean of aortic root rotation angle was significantly higher in females (P value = 0.02). No association between cases’ age with either aortic root rotation angle or aortic diameter was found (P value = 0.33, r = 0.098, and P value = 0.085, r = 0.173 respectively).


Based on the findings of the current study, aortic root rotation angle was independently in direct association with thoracic aortic dissection. In addition, females had higher aortic root rotation angles.


Computed tomography angiography Aortic valve Aortic root 




Compliance with ethical standards

The proposal of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (project number 396830). Informed consent was not used because all CT angiograms had been performed with clinical indication, even though confidentiality reassurance of patient’s information has been given to all patients who undergone CT in our institutes.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

There is no objection to animal or human rights in this study.


  1. 1.
    Capoccia L, Riambau V. Current evidence for thoracic aorta type B dissection management. Vascular. 2014;22:439–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fatima S, Sharma K. Painless aortic dissection—diagnostic dilemma with fatal outcomes: what do we learn? J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2017;5 2324709617721252.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sommer G, Sherifova S, Oberwalder PJ, et al. Mechanical strength of aneurysmatic and dissected human thoracic aortas at different shear loading modes. J Biomech. 2016;49:2374–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jia LX, Zhang WM, Li TT, et al. ER stress dependent microparticles derived from smooth muscle cells promote endothelial dysfunction during thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Clin Sci. 2017;131:1287–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berdajs D, Mosbahi S, Ferrari E, Charbonnier D, von Segesser LK. Aortic valve pathology as a predictive factor for acute aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:1340–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shan Y, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jariwala P, Kale SS, Sepur L, Padma Kumar EA. Tetralogy of Fallot, left ventricular clot, aortic dissection: rare association. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017;25:534–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Babu AR, Byju AG, Gundiah N. Biomechanical properties of human ascending thoracic aortic dissections. J Biomech Eng. 2015;137:081013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chi Q, He Y, Luan Y, Qin K, Mu L. Numerical analysis of wall shear stress in ascending aorta before tearing in type Aaortic dissection. Comput Biol Med. 2017;89:236–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ha H, Kim GB, Kweon J, et al. The influence of the aortic valve angle on the hemodynamic features of the thoracic aorta. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egbe AC, Crestanello J, Miranda WR, Connolly HM. Thoracic aortic dissection in Tetralogy of Fallot:A review of the National inpatient sample database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011943.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagy CD, Alejo DE, Corretti MC, et al. Tetralogy of Fallot and aortic root dilation: a long-term outlook. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:809–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burkhart HM, Thompson JL, Phillips SD. Proximal aortic aneurysms in patients with conotruncal anomalies: Size matters… but so do other things. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:210–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bozok S, Kestelli M, Ilhan G, et al. Tips and pearls for “true” dextroposition of the aorta in tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young. 2013;23:377–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isaaz K, Cloez JL, Marcon F, Worms AM, Pernot C. Is the aorta truly dextroposed in tetralogy of Fallot? A two-dimensional echocardiographic answer. Circulation. 1986;73:892–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tretter JT, Mori S, Saremi F, et al. Variations in rotation of the aortic root and membranous septum with implications for transcatheter valve implantation. Heart. 2018;104:999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saremi F, Cen S, Tayari N, et al. A correlative study of Aortic root rotation angle and thoracic aortic sizes using ECG gated CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2017;89:60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flachskampf FA. How exactly do you measure that aorta?: lessons from multimodality imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:227–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bissell MM, Hess AT, Biasiolli L, et al. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hager A, Kaemmerer H, Rapp-Bernhardt U, et al. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:1060–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin FY, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of the thoracic aorta by multidetector computed tomography: age-and sex-specific reference values in adults without evident cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008;2:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, School of MedicineIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations