Advertisement

Octogenarians and aortic valve surgery: surgical outcomes in the geriatric population

  • Stuart MossEmail author
  • Mathew Doyle
  • Regina Hong
  • Con Manganas
  • Sheen Peeceeyen
Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The era of percutaneous aortic valve intervention has challenged the continuing indication for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of the elderly patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy, in order to assess the impact of surgery on patient outcomes and discharge destination.

Methods

The study involves a retrospective observational analysis in a single centre, including all octogenarian patients who underwent aortic valve surgery between January of 2011 and July of 2016. The study assessed pre-operative co-morbidities and post-operative outcomes, including long-term mortality and discharge destination following on from surgery.

Results

The mean age of patients was 82.7 years (± 2.9), 67% of whom were male. The mean EuroSCORE II was 8.1 (± 7.6). The most common pre-operative co-morbidities were dyslipidaemia (82%), hypertension (80%), and ischaemic heart disease (78.8%). The median length of stay was 10 days (± 6.9 days). Discharge home occurred in 71.8% of patients, with 21.2% of patients requiring transfer to a rehabilitation facility, and 1.2% of patients required placement into an aged care facility. There were five peri-operative deaths, equating to 5.9% of the cohort.

Conclusion

Despite high EuroSCORE II values for the majority of our patients, our data adds to overall suggestions that the octogenarian population can be considered eligible for SAVR and should not be excluded due to age alone. The use of the EuroSCORE II index more accurately predicts adequacy for treatment however does not entirely predict overall course of events, and proceduralist discretion should still be used.

Keywords

AVR Aortic valve replacement Octogenarians 

Notes

Funding

Nil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (SESLHD NSW Health Ethics Committee – HREC ref. no. 16/088 (LNR/16/POWH/173)) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Taken and complied.

References

  1. 1.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2014. Australian historical population statistics, 2014. ABS cat. No. 3105.0.65.001. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ABS 2017. Australian demographic statistics, Jun 2016. ABS cat. No. 3101.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø Study Heart. 2012;99:396–400.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation. 2005;111:3316–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seco M, Edelman JJ, Forrest P, et al. Geriatric cardiac surgery: chronology vs. biology. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:794–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walther T, Blumenstein J, van Linden A, Kempfert J. Contemporary management of aortic stenosis: surgical aortic valve replacement remains the gold standard. Heart. 2012;98:iv23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melby SJ, Zierer A, Kaiser SP, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surgery. 2007;83:1651–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2—isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noyez L, Kievit PC, van Swieten HA, de Boer MJ. Cardiac operative risk evaluation: the euro SCORE II, does it make a real difference? Neth Heart J. 2012;20:494–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    New EuroSCORE II (2011). [Internet] Euroscore.org. Cited 5 November 2018, from http://www.euroscore.org/calc.html
  12. 12.
    Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:734–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    THE RYERSON INDEX [Internet]. Ryersonindex.org. 2018 [cited 5 November 2018]. Available from: https://www.ryersonindex.org/.
  14. 14.
    Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ditchfield JA, Granger E, Spratt P, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:841–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ho E, Mathur MN, Brady PW, et.al. Surgical aortic valve replacement in very elderly patients aged 80 years and over: evaluation of early clinical outcomes. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:242–248.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:c179–84.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris RS, Yan TD, Black D, et al. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:618–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dell'Amore A, Aquino TM, Pagliaro M, Lamarra M, Zussa C. Aortic valve replacement with and without combined coronary bypass grafts in very elderly patients: early and long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:491–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Timek TA, Turfe Z, Hooker RL, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:518–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang T, Choi D, Ramanathan T, Ruygrok P. Eight-year cohort study of octogenarians undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without concurrent coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24:S96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St George HospitalSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations