Skip to main content
Log in

The enigma of removing a chest tube in thoracic trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Injuries are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality around the world, and their burden is expected to rise dramatically by the year 2020. Tube thoracostomy is the most widely performed procedure for management of blunt and penetrating chest traumas and has a pivotal role in their management. Chest tube (Ct) drain output is the main determinant in the management and removal of chest tube. The present study was conducted to correlate drainage volume with timing of chest tube removal, with an aim to establish a safe drainage volume for chest tube removal.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted after ethical clearance in a tertiary care hospital on 150 patients of blunt thoracic trauma who underwent tube thoracostomy for hemopneumothorax between August 2011 and December 2012. Patients were planned for sequence randomization in three groups, viz. group A, group B, and group C, in which chest tubes were planned to be removed at a drainage output of 50 ml in group A, 100 ml drainage output in group B, and 150 ml drainage output in group C, with 50 patients in each group.

Result

Rate of re-accumulation after chest tube removal did not differ significantly among the three groups (p > 0.05). Total significant re-accumulation rate (for which aspiration was required) was 5.8 % in group A, 5.7 % in group B, and 5.8 % in group C, respectively

Conclusion

Drainage volume of 150 ml at the time of chest tube removal has no impact on re-accumulation and is not associated with any increase in morbidity. It is associated with a shorter hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. 10 facts on injuries and violence. 2008 08/03/2009, Available at: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/injuries/en/index.html.

  2. Short RM, Critttenden M, Indeck M, Hartunjan SL, Rodriguez A. Blunt thoracic trauma: analysis of 515 patients. Ann Surg. 1987;206:200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Surgeons Committee in Trauma. Advanced trauma life support course for doctors instructor course manual. 8th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons 2008;103–109.

  4. Gatzoulis MA. Section 7, thorax. In: Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Elsevier; 2008. p. 917–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mefire AC, Pagbe JJ, Fokou M, Nguimbous JF, Guifo ML, Bahebeck J. Analysis of epidemiology, lesions, treatment and outcome of 354 consecutive cases of blunt and penetrating trauma to the chest in an African setting. S Afr J Surg. 2010;48:90–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lema MK, Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Mahalu W. Pattern and outcome of chest injuries at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumann MH. What size of chest tubes? What drainage system is ideal? And other chest tube management questions. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003;9:276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martino K, Merrit S, Boyakye K, et al. Prospective randomized trial of thoracostomy removal algorithms. J Trauma. 1999;46:369–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aguilar MM, Battistella FD, Owings JT, Su T. Posttraumatic empyema. Risk factor analysis. Arch Surg. 1997;132:647–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luketich JD, Sugarbaker D. Chest wall and pleura. Sabiston textbook of surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 1723.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maddous M, Luketich JD. Chest wall, lung, mediastinum and pleura. In: Brumicardi FC, editor. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. p. 555.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad F, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:658–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomlinson MA, Treasure T. Insertion of a chest drain: how to do it. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;58:248–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S. Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial. J Inj Viol Reser. 2009;1:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miserocchi G. Physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid turnover. Eur J Respir J. 1997;10:219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iribhogbe PE, Uwuigbe O. Complications of tube thoracostomy using advanced trauma life support technique in chest trauma. West Afr J Med. 2011;30:369–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oparah SS, Mandal AK. Penetrating stab wounds of the chest: experience with 200 consecutive cases. J Trauma. 1976;16:868–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McGillicuddy D, Rosen P. Diagnostic dilemmas and current controversies in blunt chest trauma. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2007;25:695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayank Tripathi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathi, M., Yadav, R., Karwasra, R.K. et al. The enigma of removing a chest tube in thoracic trauma. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 31, 148–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-015-0363-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-015-0363-8

Keywords

Navigation