Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 2147–2159 | Cite as

Stage characteristics and driving forces of China’s energy efficiency convergence—an empirical analysis

  • Xiongfeng Pan
  • Xianyou PanEmail author
  • Zhiming Jiao
  • Jinbo Song
  • Yang Ming
Original Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Based on non-radial directional distance function, this paper measures the provincial total factor energy efficiency in China during the period from 2000 to 2015. And then, this paper analyzes the stage characteristics and driving forces of energy efficiency convergence based on the improving of traditional beta-convergence model. The empirical results confirm that there is a significant absolute beta-convergence trend of energy efficiency from 2000 to 2015 in China. However, the convergence trend of energy efficiency has obvious stage characteristics. Before 2006, energy efficiency has a significant convergence trend, but it is characterized by divergence after 2006. Technological progress significantly promotes the convergence of regional energy efficiency before 2006. During the period from 2006 to 2015, the industrial restructuring accelerates the speed of energy efficiency divergence. Conclusively, this paper offers pieces of objective and reasonable policy advice according to the conclusions mentioned above.

Keywords

Technological progress Industrial restructuring Energy efficiency Convergence Non-radial directional distance function 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 71303029 and 71734001), the National Social Science Foundation Project (Grant number 17BGL266), the Liaoning Provincial Economic and Social Development Project (2019lslktyb-011), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT18RW210), and the Dalian Youth Science and Technology Star Cultivation Project (2016RQ004).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ali, E., & Yang, G. L. (2016). CO2 emissions reduction of Chinese light manufacturing industries: a novel RAM-based global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. Energy Policy, 96, 397–410.Google Scholar
  2. Apergis, N., & Christou, C. (2016). Energy productivity convergence: new evidence from club converging. Applied Economics Letters., 23(2), 142–145.Google Scholar
  3. Burneet, J.W., Madariaga, J. (2017). The convergence of US state-level energy intensity. Energy Economics, 62, 357–370.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, X. H., Gao, Y. Y., & An, Q. X. (2018). Energy efficiency measurement of Chinese Yangtze River Delta’s cities transportation: a DEA window analysis approach. Energy Efficiency., 11(8), 1941–1953.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, Y., Lv, K. J., & Wang, J. (2018). Energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emission efficiency, and related abatement costs in regional China: a synthesis of input-output analysis and DEA. Energy Efficiency, 12(4), 863–877.Google Scholar
  6. Chung, Y. H., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229–240.Google Scholar
  7. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Giannakis, M., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: some empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics., 193, 63–76.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, R. J. R., Sun, P. Y., & Chen, S. Y. (2014). Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: a Chinese city-level study. Energy Economics., 40, 484–494.Google Scholar
  9. Fallahi, F. (2017). Stochastic convergence in per capita energy use in world. Energy Economic., 65, 228–239.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2010). Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research., 200, 320–322.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
  12. Guo, W., Sun, T., & Zhou, P. (2015). Evaluation of China regional total factor energy efficiency and its spatial convergence based on the improved undesirable SBM model. Systems Engineering., 33(5), 70–80.Google Scholar
  13. Han, L., Han, B. T., Shi, X. P., et al. (2018). Energy efficiency convergence across countries in the context of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Applied Energy, 213, 112–122.Google Scholar
  14. Hao, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhong, M., & Li, B. (2015). Is there convergence in per capita SO2 emissions in China? An empirical study using city-level panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production., 108, 944–954.Google Scholar
  15. Hardin, G. (1979). Tragedy of the commons. Current Contents/Social & Behavioral. Sciences., 20, 22–22.Google Scholar
  16. Herrerias, M. J. (2012). World energy intensity convergence revisited: a weighted distribution dynamics approach. Energy Policy, 49(49), 383–399.Google Scholar
  17. Herrerias, M., Aller, C., & Ordonez, J. (2017). Residential energy consumption: a convergence analysis across Chinese regions. Energy Economics., 62, 371–381.Google Scholar
  18. Jin, W., & Zhang, Z. X. (2017). The tragedy of product homogeneity and knowledge non-spillovers: explaining the slow pace of energy technological progress. Annals of Operations Research., 255(1–2), 639–661.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Karimu, A., Brannlund, R., Lundgren, T., et al. (2017). Energy intensity and convergence in Swedish industry: a combined econometric and decomposition analysis. Energy Economic., 62, 347–356.Google Scholar
  20. Li, S. X., & Cheng, J. H. (2008). Study on the energy efficiency of China and its determinants. Statistical Research., (10), 18–27.Google Scholar
  21. Li, K., & Lin, B. Q. (2015). Metafroniter energy efficiency with CO2 emissions and its convergence analysis for China. Energy Economics., 48, 230–241.Google Scholar
  22. Li, H. M., Wu, T., Zhao, X. F., Wang, X., & Qi, Y. (2014). Regional disparities and carbon “outsourcing”: the political economy of China’s energy policy. Energy., 66, 950–958.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, B., & Du, K. (2015). Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy., 78, 113–124.Google Scholar
  24. List, J. A., McHone, W. W., & Mollimet, D. L. (2003). Effects of air quality regulation on the destination choice of relocating plants. Oxford Economic Papers., 55(4), 657–678.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, W. S., & Lin, B. Q. (2018). Analysis of energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China’s transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production., 170, 674–682.Google Scholar
  26. Markandya, A., Pedroso-Galinato, S., & Streimikiene, D. (2006). Energy intensity in transition economies: is there convergence towards the EU average? Energy Economics., 28(1), 121–145.Google Scholar
  27. Meng, F. Y., Su, B., Thomson, E., et al. (2016). Measuring China’s regional energy and carbon emission efficiency with DEA models: a survey. Applied Energy., 183, 1–21.Google Scholar
  28. Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2017). Conditional convergence in Australia’s energy consumption at the sector level. Energy Economic., 62, 396–403.Google Scholar
  29. Mulder, P., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2012). Structural change and convergence of energy intensity across OECD countries, 1970–2005. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1910–1921.Google Scholar
  30. Munisamy, S., & Arabi, B. (2015). Eco-efficiency change in power plants: Using a slacks-based measure for the metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. Journal of Clear Production., 105), 218–232.Google Scholar
  31. Pan, X. F., Liu, Q., & Peng, X. X. (2015). Spatial club convergence of regional energy efficiency in China. Ecological Indicators., 51, 25–30.Google Scholar
  32. Pan, X. F., Zhang, J., Li, C. Y., et al. (2018). Analysis of China’s regional wind power generation efficiency and its influencing factors. Energy & Environment., 2018(8), 0958305X18788820.Google Scholar
  33. Parker, S., & Liddle, B. (2017). Economy-wide and manufacturing energy productivity transition paths and club convergence for OECD and non-OECD countries. Energy Economics., 62, 338–346.Google Scholar
  34. Sahoo, N. R., Mohapatra, P. K. J., Sahoo, B. K., & Mahanty, B. (2017). Rationality of energy efficiency improvement targets under the PAT scheme in India—a case of thermal power plants. Energy Economics., 66, 279–289.Google Scholar
  35. Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1990). On growth and states. Boston: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  36. Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1996). The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal, 106, 1019–1036.Google Scholar
  37. Shan H. J. (2008). Re-estimate of capital stock in China: 1952-2006. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economic, (10):17–31.Google Scholar
  38. Shen, N., Zhou, J. J., & Zou, W. J. (2015). Energy efficiency measures and convergence in China, taking into account the effects of environmental and random factors. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies., 24(1), 257–267.Google Scholar
  39. Singh, D., Pattnaik, A. S., & Ketencioglu, E. (2018). Corporate expansion during pro-market reforms in emerging markets: the contingent value of group affiliation and diversification. Journal of Business Research., 82, 220–229.Google Scholar
  40. Song, M. L., Chen, Y., & An, Q. X. (2018). Spatial econometric analysis of factors influencing regional energy efficiency in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 25(14), 13745–13759.Google Scholar
  41. Suzuki, S., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2015). A target-oriented data envelopment analysis for energy-environment improvement in Japan. Energy Efficiency., 8(3), 433–446.Google Scholar
  42. Umit, B., and Dilek, D.C. (2018) Revisiting energy intensity convergence: new evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International.Google Scholar
  43. Wan, M. (1998). China’s economic growth and the environment in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asian Survey, 38(4), 365–378.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, D., Wang, R., & Han, B. T. (2019). The effect of telecommunication sevices on energy intensity in China. Energy Efficiency., 12(3), 653–666.Google Scholar
  45. Wei, C., & Shen, M. H. (2008). Structural adjustment can improve energy efficiency: a research based on the Chinese provincial data. World Economy., (11), 77–85.Google Scholar
  46. Wei, W. X., Chen, D. Z., & Hu, D. P. (2016). Study on the evolvement of technology development and energy efficiency: a case study of the past 30 years of development in Shanghai. Sustainability., 8(5), su8050457.Google Scholar
  47. Woo, C., Chung, Y., Chun, D., Seo, H., & Hong, S. (2015). The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: a Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews., 47, 367–376.Google Scholar
  48. Wu, A. H., Cao, Y. Y., & Liu, B. (2014). Energy efficiency evaluation for regions in China: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Efficiency., 7(3), 429–439.Google Scholar
  49. Xu, S. C., Zhang, W. W., & He, Z. X. (2017). Decomposition analysis of the decoupling indicator of carbon emissions due to fossil energy consumption from economic growth in China. Energy Efficiency., 10(6), 1365–1380.Google Scholar
  50. Zaim, O., & Gazel, T. U. (2018). Overcoming the shortcomings of energy intensity index: a directional technology distance function approach. Energy Efficiency., 11(3), 559–575.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang. (2016). Labor mobility, housing prices and urban economic convergence—evidence from cities in Yangtze River Delta. Industrial Economic Research., (3), 82–90.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, G., & Lin, B. (2018). Impact of structure on unified efficiency for Chinese service sector—a two-stage analysis. Applied Energy, 231, 876–886.Google Scholar
  53. Zhang, W., Pan, X. F., Yan, Y. B., et al. (2017). Convergence analysis of regional energy efficiency in china based on large-dimensional panel data model. Journal of Cleaner Production., 142, 801–808.Google Scholar
  54. Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2008). Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy., 36, 2911–2916.Google Scholar
  55. Zhou P., Ang, B.W., Wang, H. (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(3):625–635.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Zou, W. J., Cai, P. H., Shen, N., & Lu, C. C. (2015). The technology gap of Chinese region’s energy efficiency and spatial convergence—based on the hybrid meta-frontier data envelopment analysis. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy., 7(2), 023124–023138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations