Advertisement

Research on value and factors of the guarantee payment in the energy performance contracting in China

  • Dong Qian
  • Guoqi ZhuEmail author
  • Ju’e Guo
Original Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Mistrust of the Energy Using Organisation (EUO) in Energy Services Company (ESCO) is a key factor that hinders the development of Energy Performance Contracting Projects (EPCPs) in China, especially the EPCP is the shared savings type. A payment guarantee that is able to hedge the credit risk of the EUO is the rational choice for the ESCO. Considering an EPCP payment guarantee with a limit on the total amount that is essentially a multi-period European put option portfolio with multiple uncertain exercise prices that the guarantor sells to the ESCO, this paper constructs a valuation formula of an EPCP payment guarantee, in which the exercise price follows the geometric Brownian motion with a Poisson jump, and analyses the effects of the factors on the value of the payment guarantee. The results revealed the following. First, the value of the payment guarantee is affected by the total guaranteed amount, uncertainty in ESCO’s revenue, and uncertainty in EUO’s net cash flow, and consideration of the impact of unexpected shocks on the exercise price can avoid overrating the value. Second, the value of the payment guarantee for each period within the scope of the full guarantee increases with an increase in the ESCO’s initial revenue flow, proportion of the revenue sharing and expected revenue growth rate, and it decreases with an increase in the risk-adjusted discount rate and EUO’s initial net cash flow; the value of the payment guarantee for each period within the scope of the full guarantee first decreases and subsequently increases with an increase in the risk-level of ESCO’s revenue and the EUO’s net cash flow. Third, the results of the Sobol’s sensitivity analysis indicate that, within the scope of the full guarantee, the ESCO’s initial revenue flow, proportion of the revenue sharing, the risk-adjusted discount rate and EUO’s initial net cash flow play relatively important roles in changing the EPCP payment guarantee and its exercise prices. According to the above conclusions, the payment guarantee contract can provide the ESCO with a basis for decision-making in the formulation of a strategy to safeguard energy conservation revenues in accordance with the relationships embodied by the value of the payment guarantee. Finally, the policy recommendations about relieving the mistrust between EUOs and ESCOs are provided.

Keywords

Energy performance contracting project Energy services company Payment guarantee Valuation formula Sobol’s sensitivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 71603209, 71473193, 71503200, 41602336); the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2018JQ7006); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2016RWYB04, 2016RWYB03). We would also like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Angoua, P., Lai, V. S., & Soumaré, I. (2008). Project risk choices under privately guaranteed debt financing. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(1), 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansar, J., & Sparks, R. (2009). The experience curve, option value, and the energy paradox. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1012–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backlund, S., & Eidenskog, M. (2013). Energy service collaborations—it is a question of trust. Energy Efficiency, 6(3), 511–521.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9189-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakken, H., Lindset, S., & Olson, L. H. (2006). Pricing of multi-period rate of return guarantees: the Monte Carlo approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 39(1), 135–149.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bannai, M., Tomita, Y., Ishida, Y., Miyazaki, T., Akisawa, A., & Kashiwagi, T. (2007). Risk hedging against the fuel price fluctuation in energy service business. Energy, 32(11), 2051–2060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 63(2), 167–241.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertoldi, P., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2017). Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 107, 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Vine, E. (2006). Energy service companies in European countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development. Energy Policy, 34(14), 1818–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–654.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannavo, F. (2012). Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection. Computers & Geosciences, 44, 52–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, C.-C., Chung, S.-L., & Yu, M.-T. (2006). Loan guarantee portfolios and joint loan guarantees with stochastic interest rates. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(1), 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty (Vol. 15). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dreessen, T. (2003). Advantages and disadvantages of the two dominant world ESCO models; shared savings and guaranteed savings. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First Pan-European Conference on Energy Service Companies.Google Scholar
  15. EVO (2009). International Energy Efficiency Financing Protocol: Standardized Concepts. Google Scholar
  16. Fan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Research on the development strategy of building energy efficiency service industry. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, S. (1978). Call option pricing when the exercise price is uncertain, and the valuation of index bonds. The Journal of Finance, 33(1), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (2010). General technical rules for energy performance contracting (Vol. GB/T24915-2010) (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Issaka, A., & Sengupta, I. (2017). Analysis of variance based instruments for Ornstein–Uhlenbeck type models: swap and price index. Annals of Finance, 13, 401–434.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, E. P., & Mason, S. P. (1980). Valuation of loan guarantees. Journal of Banking & Finance, 4(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostka, G., & Shin, K. (2013). Energy conservation through energy service companies: Empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 52(0), 748–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin, T. T., & Huang, S. L. (2010). An entry and exit model on the energy-saving investment strategy with real options. Energy Policy, 38(2), 794–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin, T. T., & Huang, S.-L. (2011). Application of the modified Tobin’s q to an uncertain energy-saving project with the real options concept. Energy Policy, 39(1), 408–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin, J., Goldman, C., Levine, M., & Hopper, N. (2004). Developing an energy efficiency service industry. Shanghai: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindset, S. (2003). Pricing of multi-period rate of return guarantees. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33(3), 629–644.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Marino, A., Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2011). A snapshot of the European energy service market in 2010 and policy recommendations to foster a further market development. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6190–6198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Merton, R. C. (1977). An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees an application of modern option pricing theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mody, A., & Patro, D. (1995). Methods of loan guarantee valuation and accounting. World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Patari, S., Annala, S., Jantunen, A., Viljainen, S., & Sinkkonen, A. (2016). Enabling and hindering factors of diffusion of energy service companies in Finland-results of a Delphi study. Energy Efficiency, 9(6), 1447–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9433-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qian, D., & Guo, J. E. (2014). Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of energy performance contracting projects. Energy Policy, 73(5), 710–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145(2), 280–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Scoleri, S., Bianchetti, M., & Kucherenko, S. (2017). Application of quasi Monte Carlo and global sensitivity analysis to option pricing and Greeks. Social Science Electronic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  34. Sengupta, I. (2016). Generalized BN–S stochastic volatility model for option Pricing. International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Finance, 19(02), 1650014.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Sobol, I. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1–3), 271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Soumaré, I. (2006). Investment incentives in project finance in the presence of partial loan guarantees. Research in Finance, 22, 161–186.Google Scholar
  37. Toomey, D. E., & McNulty, T. (2002). Surety bonds: a basic user's guide for payment bond claimants and obligees. Construction Law, 22, 5.Google Scholar
  38. Van Lai, S., & Yu, M.-T. (1999). An accurate analysis of vulnerable loan guarantees. Research in Finance, 17, 103–138.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Zhao, T. (2008). Analysis of interactions among the barriers to energy saving in China. Energy Policy, 36(6), 1879–1889.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu, Y. C., & He, J. (2007). Option pricing of credit guaranty based on minimal net cash flow requirement (in Chinese). Systems Engineering, 06, 121–123.Google Scholar
  41. Xu, Y. C., & Yang, J. G. (2008). Option pricing of credit guarantee under the condition of counter-guarantee provided by third party (in Chinese). Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 42(9), 1566–1569.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu, P., Chan, E. H.-W., & Qian, Q. K. (2011). Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7389–7398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, P. G. (1998). Exotic options. World Scientific.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economics & ManagementNorthwest A & F UniversityYanglingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations