Carbon pricing and energy efficiency: pathways to deep decarbonization of the US electric sector
- 91 Downloads
Despite the commitment of the Paris agreement to pursue efforts to limit end-of-century global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, few have studied mitigation pathways consistent with such a demanding goal. This paper uses a fully integrated engineering- economic model of the U.S. energy system, to explore the ability of the U.S. electricity sector to operate within a budget of 44 gigatons of CO2 (GtCO2) between 2016 and 2040 - almost 20 percent less than projected. Our modeling results suggest that carbon taxes coupled with strong energy-efficiency policies would produce synergistic effects that could meet deep decarbonization goals. Combining energy-efficiency initiatives with a $10/tCO2 tax rising to $27/tCO2 in 2040 (in $2013) would achieve the U.S. electric sector's carbon budget with a net savings to the U.S. economy. A $20/tCO2 tax rising to $53/tCO2 in 2040 would also stay below this budget, but it would cost more if not coupled with strong energy efficiency. U.S. regionswillwin or lose depending on their generationmix and how carbon tax revenues are recycled.
KeywordsCarbon pricing Deep decarbonization Clean energy transition Energy efficiency Carbon tax recycling
The valuable comments of three anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated. Many colleagues and stakeholders contributed meaningfully to the development of this paper’s scenarios and the presentation of results, including Melissa Lapsa (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Luis Martinez, Katie Southworth, and Starla Yeh (Natural Resources Defense Council), Joe Kruger (Resources for the Future), Charles Rossmann (Southern Company), Joe Hoagland (Tennessee Valley Authority), Meredith Wingate (Energy Foundation), Etan Gumerman, Brian Murray, David Hoppock, and Martin Ross (Duke University’s Nicholas Institute), and Dan Matisoff, Emanuele Massetti, Alice Favero, Gyungwon Kim, and Anmol Soni (Georgia Tech’s Climate and Energy Policy Lab). In addition, Laura Martin, Jeff Jones, and Erin Boedecker of the US Energy Information Administration and John Cymbalsky, Colin Cunliff, Erin Boyd, and Aaron Bergman of the US Department of Energy provided helpful advice on several key NEMS modeling issues. Last but not least, Liz Hyman provided excellent assistance with our graphics.
This research received support from the Brook Byers Institute of Sustainable Systems at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Arent, D., Tol, R. S. J., Faust, E., Hella, J. P., Kumar, S., Strzepek, K. M., Toth, F. L., & Yan, D. (2014). Key economic sectors and services. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects (pp. 659–708). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bailey and Bookbinder (2017). A winning trade, Climate Leadership Council, https://www.clcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/A_Winning_Trade.pdf.
- Bianco, Nicholas, Litz, F., Meek, K., and Gasper, R., 2013. Can the U.S. get there from here? Using existing federal laws and state action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, World Resources Institute, (http://www.wri.org/publication/can-us-get-there-here).
- Bradley, M. J., & Associates LLC. (2016). EPA’s Clean Power Plan: summary of IPM modeling results. Boston: M.J. Bradley & Associates LLC.Google Scholar
- Brown, M. A. and B. K. Sovacool. (2014). Climate change and global energy security: technology and policy options, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2017). Energy-efficiency skeptics and advocates: the debate heats up as the stakes rise. Energy Efficiency, 10(5), 1155–1173 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-017-9511-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, M.A., Matt Cox, and Rodrigo Cortes, 2010. Transforming industrial energy efficiency, The Bridge (Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering), Fall, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
- Brown, M.A., Cox, M., Sun, X. (2012). Making buildings part of the climate solution by pricing carbon efficiently, July 2012 working paper #69. https://cepl.gatech.edu/publications/pubFile/416.
- Brown, Marilyn A., Gyungwon Kim, and Alexander M. Smith. (2016). The Clean Power Plan and Beyond, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, working paper #89, http://cepl.gatech.edu/projects/ppce/cpp%26b#.
- Burtraw, D., R. Sweeney & M. Walls. (2008). The incidence of U.S. climate policy: where you sit depends on where you stand http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-08-28.pdf
- Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Available at https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/report-of-the-highlevel-commission-on-carbon-prices/.
- Chamberlain, A. (2009). Who pays for climate policy? New estimates of the household burden and economic impact of a U.S. cap-and-trade system http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/wp6.pdf.
- Chen, Y., & Hafstead M.A.C. (2016). Using a carbon tax to meet U.S. international carbon pledges, Resources for the Future, http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-DP-16-48.pdf.
- Chesney, M., Gheyssens, J., Pana, A.C., and Taschini L. (2016). Environmental finance and investments (Springer), Second edition.Google Scholar
- Cox, M., Brown, M. A., & Sun, X. (2013). Energy benchmarking of commercial buildings: a low-cost pathway for urban sustainability. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 1–12 http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/035018/pdf/1748-9326_8_3_035018.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Drehobl, A., Ross L. (2016). Lifting the high energy burden in America’s largest cities: how energy efficiency can improve low-income and underserved communities, American Council for an Energy-Efficiency Economy.Google Scholar
- Energy Information Administration (USEIA). (2017). Annual energy outlook, 2017. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
- Enkvist, P. A., Dinkel, J., & Lin, C. (2010). Impact of the financial crisis on carbon economics: version 2.1 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Company, 374.Google Scholar
- Feldstein, M., Halstead T., Gregory Mankiw N. (2017). A conservative case for climate action, Feb. 8, 2017, NY Times https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/opinion/a%2Dconservative%2Dcase%2Dfor%2Dclimate%2Daction.html.
- Grainger, C. A. & C. D. Kolstad. (2010). Who pays a price on carbon? Environmental & Resource Economics. European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 46: 359–376.Google Scholar
- Hausker, K., Meek K., Gasper R., Aden N.,& Obeiter M. 2014. Delivering on the U.S. climate commitment (World Resources Institute working paper).Google Scholar
- Horowitz, J., Cronin, J.-A., Hawkins, H., Konda, L., & Yuskavage, A. (2017). Methodology for analyzing a carbon tax. Washington, DC: Office of Tax Analysis working paper 115.Google Scholar
- IEA, & IRENA (2017). Perspectives for energy transition: investment needs for a low-carbon energy system. Available at http://www.irena.org/menu/index.aspx?mnu=Subcat&PriMenuID=36&CatID=141&SubcatID=3828.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). World energy outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
- International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014a). Climate change 2014: synthesis report (eds. Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).Google Scholar
- International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014b). Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kallakuri, Chetana, Shruti Vaidyanathan, Meegan Kelly, and Rachel Cluett. 2016. The 2016 International Energy Efficiency Scorecard Report (Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy), Report E1602.Google Scholar
- Laitner, J. A. S., Nadel, S., Sachs, H., Neal Elliott, R., & Khan, S. (2012). The long-term energy efficiency potential: what the evidence suggests. ACEEE Research Report E104. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
- Lashof, D., Yeh, S., Bryk, D., Carter, S., Doniger, D., Murrow, D., Johnson, L., 2014. Cleaner and cheaper: using the Clean Air Act to sharply reduce carbon pollution from existing power plants, delivering health, environmental, and economic benefits. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved from 〈http://www.nrdc.org/air/pollution-standards/files/pollution-standards-IB-update.pdf〉.
- Millar, R. J., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Friedlingstein, P., Rogelj, J., Grubb, M. J., Damon Matthews, H., Skeie, R. B., Forster, P. M., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2017). Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. Nature Geoscience, 10, 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO3031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomas, Stefan, Piet Boonekamp, Harry Vreuls, Jean-sébastien Broc, Didier Bosseboeuf, Bruno Lapillonne, and Nicola Labanca. 2012. How to measure the overall energy savings linked to policies and energy services at the national level? Energy Efficiency 5 (1). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media: 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9122-x.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2015a). Regulatory impact analysis for the proposed carbon pollution guidelines for existing power plants and emission standards for modified and reconstructed power plants.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2015b). Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: electric utility generating units. Report no. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013- 0602.Google Scholar
- UNFCCC 2015a. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
- UNFCCC 2015b. Paris Agreement, Art 2.Google Scholar
- USEIA (2015). Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/assumptions/pdf/0554(2015).pdf.Google Scholar
- USEIA (2018). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/data/browser/.
- World Bank (2018). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?year_high_desc=true.