Advertisement

Energy Efficiency

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 2137–2156 | Cite as

Interaction effects of energy efficiency policies: a review

  • Catharina WieseEmail author
  • Anders Larsen
  • Lise-Lotte Pade
Review Article
  • 378 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing energy efficiency and savings will play a key role in the achievement of the climate and energy targets in the European Union (EU). To meet the EU’s objectives for greenhouse gas emission reductions, renewable energy use and energy efficiency improvements, its member states have implemented and will design and implement various energy policies. This paper reviews a range of scientific articles on the topic of policy instruments for energy efficiency and savings and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different measures. The review demonstrates the variety of possible instruments and points to the complex policy environment, in which not a single instrument can meet the respective energy efficiency targets, but which requires a combination of multiple instruments. Therefore, the paper in particular focuses on assessing potential interactions between combinations of energy efficiency policies, i.e. the extent to which the different instruments counteract or support one another. So far, the literature on energy efficiency policy has paid only limited attention to the effect of interacting policies. This paper reviews and analyses interaction effects thus far identified with respect to factors that determine the interaction. Drawing on this review, we identify cases for interaction effects between energy efficiency policies to assess their potential existence systematically and to show future research needs.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Energy savings Policy instruments Interaction effects Household energy consumption Industry energy consumption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research has been financed by the Innovation Fund Denmark under the research project SAVE-E, grant no. 4106-00009B.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 265–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. The American Economic Review, 104(10), 3003–3037.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amecke, H. (2012). The impact of energy performance certificates: a survey of German home owners. Energy Policy, 46, 4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annunziata, E., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2014). Enhancing energy efficiency in public buildings: the role of local energy audit programmes. Energy Policy, 69, 364–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augustus de Melo, C., & de Martino Jannuzzi, G. (2010). Energy efficiency standards for refrigerators in Brazil: a methodology for impact evaluation. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6545–6550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbetta, G. P., Canino, P., & Cima, S. (2015). The impact of energy audits on energy efficiency investment of public owners. Evidence from Italy. Energy, 93, 1199–1209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkhout, P. H. G., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Muskens, J. C. (2004). The ex post impact of an energy tax on household energy demand. Energy Economics, 26(3), 297–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertoldi, P., & Rezessy, S. (2008). Tradable white certificate schemes: fundamental concepts. Energy Efficiency, 1(4), 237–255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9021-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., and Bürer, M.J. (2005). Will emission trading promote end-use energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry of the American Council for Energy Efficient Economy. http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2005/data/papers/SS05_Panel04_Paper01.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  10. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., Lees, E., Baudry, P., Jeandel, A., & Labanca, N. (2010). Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1455–1469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Oikonomou, V. (2013). Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings. Energy Policy, 56, 526–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2006). Actual interaction effects between policy measures for energy efficiency—a qualitative matrix method and quantitative simulation results for households. Energy, 31(14), 2512–2537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braathen, N. A. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy: how many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(2): 185–235. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000005
  14. Buchanan, K., Russo, R., & Anderson, B. (2015). The question of energy reduction: the problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy, 77, 89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Child, R., Langniss, O., Klink, J., & Gaudioso, D. (2008). Interactions of white certificates with other policy instruments in Europe. Energy Efficiency, 1(4), 283–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9025-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 on Restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:283:0051:0070:EN:PDF. Accessed 04 September 2017.
  17. Datta, S., & Filippini, M. (2016). Analysing the impact of ENERGY STAR rebate policies in the US. Energy Efficiency, 9(3), 677–698.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9386-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Datta, S., & Gulati, S. (2014). Utility rebates for ENERGY STAR appliances: are they effective? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(3), 480–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Del Río, P. (2010). Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4978–4989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Río González, P. (2007). The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(8), 1363–1390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9069-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dubois, M., & Allacker, K. (2015). Energy savings from housing: ineffective renovation subsidies vs efficient demolition and reconstruction incentives. Energy Policy, 86, 697–704.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. bigEE, Bridging the information gap on Energy Efficiency in buildings. How policies need to interact in packages: bigEE recommendations on which measures to combine for effective policy. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. http://www.bigee.net/media/filer_public/2013/11/28/bigee_txt_0006_pg_how_policies_need_to_interact_2.pdf. Accessed 18 Januar 2018.
  23. Ek, K., & Söderholm Patrik, P. (2010). The devil is in the details: household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1578–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. European Commission (2011). 'Energy roadmap 2050. COM(2011) 885. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0885&from=EN. Accessed 04 April 2017.
  25. European Commission (2016). Clean energy for all Europeans. COM(2016) 860. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:fa6ea15b-b7b0-11e6-9e3c-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  26. European Parliament (2012). Implementation of the energy efficiency directive (2012/27/EU): energy efficiency obligation schemes. European Implementation Assessment. European Parlamentary Research Service. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579327/EPRS_STU(2016)579327_EN.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017.
  27. European Parliament (2013). Energy efficiency and the ETS. Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/492468/IPOL-ITRE_ET(2013)492468_EN.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  28. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Muskens, A. C., & van Leeuwen, M. J. (2002). Behavioural responses to energy-related taxes: a survey. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 18(2–4), 202–217.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2002.000960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer, C., and Preonas, L. (2010). Combining policies for renewable energy: is the whole less than the sum of its parts? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 4(1): 51–92. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000030
  31. Galarraga, I., Abadie, L. M., & Ansuategi, A. (2013). Efficiency, effectiveness and implementation feasibility of energy efficiency rebates: the “Renove” plan in Spain. Energy Economics, 40, 98–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Galarraga, I., Abadie, L. M., & Kallbekken, S. (2016). Designing incentive schemes for promoting energy-efficient appliances: a new methodology and a case study for Spain. Energy Policy, 90, 24–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU—how do the emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact? Energy Policy, 64, 175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G., Sweeney, J., Brennan, T., Auffhammer, M., Howarth, R., & Cullenward, D. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1), 597–620.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.102308.124234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giraudet, L.-G., and Finon, D. (2014). European experiences with white certificate obligations: a critical review of existing evaluations. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(1): 113–130. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.4.1.lgir
  36. Giraudet, L.-G., Bodineau, L., and Finon, D. (2011). The costs and benefits of white certificates schemes CIRED Working Papers Series, No. 29-2011.Google Scholar
  37. Gleerup, M., Larsen, A., Leth-Petersen, S., & Togeby, M. (2010). The effect of feedback by text message (SMS) and email on household electricity consumption: experimental evidence. The Energy Journal, 31(3), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy, 28(6–7), 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grösche, P., & Vance, C. (2009). Willingness to pay for energy conservation and free-ridership on subsidization: evidence from Germany. The Energy Journal, 30(2), 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henriksson, E., & Söderholm, P. (2009). The cost-effectiveness of voluntary energy efficiency programs. Energy for Sustainable Development, 13(4), 235–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hou, J., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhou, N., & Feng, W. (2016). Comparative study of commercial building energy-efficiency retrofit policies in four pilot cities in China. Energy Policy, 88, 204–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jacobsen, G. D. (2016). Improving energy codes. Energy Journal, 37(1), 25–40.  https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.1.gjac.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean? Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johannsen, K. S. (2002). Combining voluntary agreements and taxes—an evaluation of the Danish agreement scheme on energy efficiency in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(2), 129–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00031-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research and Social Science, 23, 11–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kjærbye, V. H. (2008). Does energy labelling on residential housing cause energy savings? AKF Workingpaper. https://www.kora.dk/media/272155/udgivelser_2008_pdf_energy_labelling.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  48. Kjærbye, V. H., Larsen, A., & Togeby, M. (2010). The effect of building regulations on energy consumption in single-family houses in Denmark. Copenhagen: Ea Energy Analyses http://www.ea-energianalyse.dk/reports/the_effect_of_building_regulations_on_energy_consumption_in_single_family_houses_in_Denmark.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.Google Scholar
  49. Krarup, S., & Ramesohl, S. (2002). Voluntary agreements on energy efficiency in industry—not a golden key, but another contribution to improve climate policy mixes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(2), 109–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00032-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laing, T., Sato, M., Grubb, M., & Comberti, C. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading system. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larsen, A., & Jensen, M. (1999). Evaluations of energy audits and the regulator. Energy Policy, 27(9), 557–564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00033-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lecuyer, O. and Bibas, R. (2012). Combining climate and energy policies: synergies or antagonism? Modeling interactions with energy efficiency instruments. CIRED Working Papers Series, No. 37–2012.Google Scholar
  53. Leiva, J., Palacios, A., & Aguado, J. A. (2016). Smart metering trends, implications and necessities: a policy review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 227–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ley, M., Stucki, T., & Woerter, M. (2016). The impact of energy prices on green innovation. Energy Journal, 37(1), 41–75.  https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.1.mley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Linares, P., & Labandeira, X. (2010). Energy efficiency: economics and policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3), 573–592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00609.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lu, W. (2006). Potential energy savings and environmental impact by implementing energy efficiency standard for household refrigerators in China. Energy Policy, 34(13), 1583–1589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Markandya, A., Ortiz, R. A., Mudgal, S., & Tinetti, B. (2009). Analysis of tax incentives for energy-efficient durables in the EU. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5662–5674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Markandya, A., Labandeira, X., and Ramos, A. (2015). Policy instruments to foster energy efficiency. In Green Energy and Efficiency, Springer International Publishing: 93–110. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03632-8
  59. Mundaca, L. (2008). Markets for energy efficiency: exploring the implications of an EU-wide “tradable white certificate” scheme. Energy Economics, 30(6), 3016–3043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mundaca, L., & Neij, L. (2009). A multi-criteria evaluation framework for tradable white certificate schemes. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4557–4573.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nadel, S. (2002). Appliance and equipment efficiency standards. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1), 159–192.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.27.122001.083452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nauleau, M.-L., Giraudet, L.-G., & Quirion, P. (2015). Energy efficiency subsidies with price-quality discrimination. Energy Economics, 52, S53–S62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264018419-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. OECD (2011). Interactions between emission trading systems and other overlapping policy instruments. General Distribution Document, Environment Directorate, OECD, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/Interactions%20between%20Emission%20Trading%20Systems%20and%20Other%20Overlapping%20Policy%20Instruments.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  65. OECD. (2013). Taxing energy use: a graphical analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264183933-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. OECD/IEA. (2017). Market-based instruments for energy efficiency: policy choice and design. Paris: IEA Publications https://www.iea.org/publications/insights/insightpublications/MarketBased_Instruments_for_Energy_Efficiency.pdf. Accessed 01 September 2017.Google Scholar
  67. Oikonomou, V., & Jepma, C. J. (2008). A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 13(2), 131–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9082-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., & Grafakos, S. (2010). Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments always desirable? Energy Policy, 38(8), 4186–4195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., Zeugolis, D., and Grafakos, S. (2012). A qualitative assessment of EU energy policy interactions. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 7(2): 177–187. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240902788996
  70. Oikonomou, V., Flamos, A., and Grafakos, S. (2014). Combination of energy policy instruments: creation of added value or overlapping? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(1): 46–56. Doi  https://doi.org/10.1080/15567241003716696.
  71. Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review, 92(1), 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Price, L. (2005). Voluntary agreements for energy efficiency or GHG emissions reduction in industry: an assessment of programs around the world. Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry of the American Council for Energy Efficient Economy. http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2005/data/papers/SS05_Panel05_Paper12.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  73. Ramos, A., Gago, A., Labandeira, X., & Linares, P. (2015). The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. Energy Economics, 52, S17–S29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rezessy, S., & Bertoldi, P. (2011). Voluntary agreements in the field of energy efficiency and emission reduction: review and analysis of experiences in the European Union. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7121–7129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rietbergen, M. G., Farla, J. C. M., & Blok, K. (2002). Do agreements enhance energy efficiency improvement? Analysing the actual outcome of long-term agreements on industrial energy efficiency improvement in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(2), 153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00035-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept andframework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rosenow, J. (2012). Energy savings obligations in the UK-A history of change. Energy Policy, 49, 373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosenow, J., Fawcett, T., Eyre, N., and Oikonomou, V. (2015). Energy saving policies and energy efficiency obligation schemes. D5.1 Combining of Energy Efficiency Obligations and alternative policies. http://enspol.eu/sites/default/files/results/D5.1Combining%20of%20Energy%20Efficiency%20Obligations%20and%20alternative%20policies.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  79. Rosenow, J., Fawcett, T., Eyre, N., and Oikonomou, V. (2016). Energy efficiency and the policy mix. Building Research & Information, 4(5–6): 562–574. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1138803
  80. Rosenow, J., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. (2017). The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: the case of energy efficiency policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosenquist, G., McNeil, M., Iyer, M., Meyers, S., & McMahon, J. (2006). Energy efficiency standards for equipment: additional opportunities in the residential and commercial sectors. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3257–3267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schiellerup, P. (2002). An examination of the effectiveness of the EU minimum standard on cold appliances: the British case. Energy Policy, 30(4), 327–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00099-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schleich, J., Rogge, K., & Betz, R. (2009). Incentives for energy efficiency in the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Efficiency, 2(1), 37–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9029-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sijm, J. (2005). The interaction between the EU emissions trading scheme and national energy policies. Climate Policy, 5(1), 79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2005.9685542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simoes, S., Huppes, G., & Seixas, J. (2015). A tangled web: assessing overlaps between energy and environmental policy instruments along the electricity supply chain. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 439–458.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sorrell, S., Smith, A., Betz, R., Waltz, R., Boemare, C., Quirion, P., Sijm, J., Mavrakis, D., Konidari, P., Vassos, S., Haralampopoulos, D., Pilinis, C. (2003). Interaction in EU climate policy. INTERACT project. Final Report. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/53992/1/INTERACT_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.
  87. Spyridaki, N. A., & Flamos, A. (2014). A paper trail of evaluation approaches to energy and climate policy interactions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 1090–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4449–4453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stenqvist, C., & Nilsson, L. J. (2012). Energy efficiency in energy-intensive industries-an evaluation of the Swedish voluntary agreement PFE. Energy Efficiency, 5(2), 225–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9131-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stiglitz, J. E., & Rosengaard, J. K. (2015). Economics of The Public Sector (4th ed.). New York / London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  91. Tinbergen, J. (1952). On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  92. Togeby, M., Dyhr-Mikkelsen, K., & James-Smith, E. (2007). Design of white certificates. Comparing UK, Italy, France and Denmark. Copenhagen: Ea Energy Analyses http://www.ea-energianalyse.dk/reports/710_White_certificates_report_19_Nov_07.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.Google Scholar
  93. Zvingilaite, E., & Togeby, M. (2015). Impact of feedback about energy consumption. Copenhagen: Ea Energy Analyses http://www.ea-energianalyse.dk/reports/1517_impact_of_feedback_about_energy_consumption.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication [June 2018]

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Engineering, Systems Analysis DivisionTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Social Sciences and BusinessRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations