Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 44:143 | Cite as

Partial dentures by centrifugal casting assisted by additive manufacturing

  • GURPARTAP SINGH
  • RUPINDER SINGHEmail author
  • SARBJIT SINGH
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

This research work focuses on preparation of partial dentures (as functional prototypes) by additive manufacturing (AM)-assisted centrifugal casting (CC). The master pattern for partial dentures was prepared on fused deposition modelling (FDM) set-up (established by AM technique at low cost). The final dentures as functional prototypes were prepared with a nickel–chromium (Ni–Cr)-based alloy by varying different proportions of Ni% (N) by weight %. The other input parameters were powder to water P/W ratio (W) and pH value (H) of water used for mixing the investment. The samples prepared were ascertained for dimensional deviation (Δd), surface finish (Ra) and micro-hardness (HV) as output parameters. Finally, multifactor optimization has been applied on output parameters of functional prototypes prepared. This study highlights that partial denture prepared with W-100/15, H-7 and N-61% gives overall better results from mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy viewpoint. The results are also supported by photo-micrographic analysis.

Keywords

Partial denture additive manufacturing pH value P/W ratio Ni–Cr alloy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Manufacturing Research Lab (Production Engineering, GNDEC Ludhiana) for all the help to carry out this research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Eggbeer D, Bibb R and Williams R 2005 The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. J. Eng. Med. 219(3): 195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bibb R, Eggbeer D and Williams R 2006 Rapid manufacture of removable partial denture frameworks. Rapid Prototyp. J. 12(2): 95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawood A, Marti B M, Sauret-Jackson V and Darwood A 2015 3D printing in dentistry. Br. Dent. J. 219: 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz M, Türp J C and Strub J R 2008 Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int. 39(2): 107–116Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang C C, Lee M Y and Wang S H 2006 Digital denture manufacturing—an integrated technologies of abrasive computer tomography, CNC machining and rapid prototyping. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 31(1): 41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee M Y, Chang C C and Ku Y C 2008 New layer-based imaging and rapid prototyping techniques for computer-aided design and manufacture of custom dental restoration. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 32(1): 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee M Y and Chang C C 2010 Layer-based abrasive computer tomography for custom denture fabrication. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), IEEE, pp. 577–582Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seferli J, Michelin M, Klinge B and Wettergren L 2014 Patients experiences of dental implant placement for treatment of partial edentulism in a student clinic setting. Swed. Dent. J. 38(2): 77–85Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kattadiyil M T, Parciak E, Puri S and Scherer M D 2014 CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry: a brief review. Alpha Omegan 107(1): 26–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson P J, Yong R, Surman T L, Rajion Z A and Ranjitkar S 2014 Application of three-dimensional computed tomography in craniofacial clinical practice and research. Aust. Dent. J. 59: 174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sokovic M and Kopac J 2006 RE (reverse engineering) as necessary phase by rapid product development. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 175(1–3): 398–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagci E 2009 Reverse engineering applications for recovery of broken or worn parts and re-manufacturing: three case studies. Adv. Eng. Softw. 40(6): 407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bi Z M and Wang L 2010 Advances in 3D data acquisition and processing for industrial applications. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 26(5): 403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geng Z and Bidanda B 2017 Review of reverse engineering systems—current state of the art. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 12(2): 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liaw C Y and Guvendiren M 2017 Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication 9(2): 024102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farjood E, Vojdani M, Torabi K and Khaledi A A R 2017 Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing. J. Prosthet. Dent. 117(1): 164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi B E, Setio A A A, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, Van Der Laak J A, Van Ginneken B and Sánchez C I 2017 A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 42: 60–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh G, Singh R and Singh S 2018 Nickel chromium based partial denture preparation: conventional vs additive manufacturing techniques. Ref. Module Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11243-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milewski J O 2017 Additive manufacturing of metals: from fundamental technology to rocket nozzles, medical implants, and custom jewelry. Springer Ser. Mater. Sci. 258: 310–323Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quadri S, Kapoor B, Singh G and Tewari R K 2017 Rapid prototyping: an innovative technique in dentistry. J. Oral Res. Rev. 9(2): 96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azari A and Nikzad S 2009 The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp. J. 15(3): 216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torabi K, Farjood E and Hamedani S 2015 Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature. J. Dent. 16(1): 1–6Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yan G D, Liao W H, Dai N, Yang L, Gao Y G, Zhu S Y and Cai Y H 2009 The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture framework. In: Proceedings of the 2 nd IEEE International conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, IEEE, pp. 266–268Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Masood S H 1996 Intelligent rapid prototyping with fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2(1): 24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bilgin M S, Baytaroğlu E N, Erdem A and Dilber E 2016 A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur. J. Dent. 10(2): 286–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alharbi N, Osman R and Wismeijer D 2016 Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 115(6): 760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chohan J S and Singh R 2017 Pre and post processing techniques to improve surface characteristics of FDM parts: a state of art review and future applications. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23(3): 495–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gausemeier J, Echterhoff N, Kokoschka M and Wall M 2012 Thinking ahead the future of additive manufacturing – future applications. In: Proceedings of the Study for the Direct Manufacturing Research Center, Paderborn, pp. 34–52Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jayaprakash K, Upadhya P N, Nandish B T, Shetty A N, Shetty K H K, Ginjupalli K, Voddya S B and Prabhu S 2014 Impact of water quality and water powder ratio on the properties of type 4-die stones (gypsum products) used in dentistry. Int. J. Health Rehabil. Sci. 3: 75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCabe J F and Walls AW 2013 Applied Dental Materials. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh R, Singh S and Singh G 2014 Dimensional accuracy comparison of investment castings prepared with wax and ABS patterns for bio-medical application. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6: 851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh R and Singh G 2015 Cast component hardness comparison for investment casting prepared with wax and ABS patterns. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 68(1): 17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tandon K, Singh A and Chandra S 2014 A comparative evaluation of conventional vs accelerated casting technique, as regards marginal fit and surface roughness. IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci. 13(10): 06–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roberts H W, Berzins D W, Moore B K and Charlton D G 2009 Metal ceramic alloys in dentistry: a review. J. Prosthodont. Implant Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 18(2): 188–194Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim E H, Lee D H, Kwon S M and Kwon T 2017 A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt–chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. J. Prosthet. Dent. 117(3): 393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jei J B and Mohan J 2014 Comparative evaluation of marginal accuracy of a cast fixed partial denture compared to soldered fixed partial denture made of two different base metal alloys and casting techniques: an in vitro study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 14(1): 104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu J C, Lai L C, Sheets C G, Earthman J and Newcomb R 2011 A comparison of the marginal adaptation of cathode-arc vapor-deposited titanium and cast base metal copings. J. Prosthet. Dent. 105(6): 403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Da Silva L J, Leal M B, Valente M L, De Castro D T, Pagnano V O, Dos Reis A C and Bezzon O L 2017 Effect of casting atmosphere on the marginal deficiency and misfit of Ni–Cr alloys with and without beryllium. J. Prosthet. Dent. 118(1): 83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cogolludo P G, Suárez M J, Peláez J and Lozano J F 2010 Influence of melting and casting methods and finish line design on the marginal discrepancy of nickel–chromium–titanium alloy crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont. 23(5): 443–445Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Singh R and Ranjan N 2018 Experimental investigations for preparation of biocompatible feedstock filament of fused deposition modeling (FDM) using twin screw extrusion process. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 31(11): 1455–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singh R and Singh G 2017 Investigations for modelling hardness of biomedical implant during replication of FDM based patterns by vacuum moulding. Sadhana 42(3): 327–333Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh J, Singh R, Singh H and Verma A K 2018 Investigations for mechanical properties and biocompatibility of SS-316L implant prepared as rapid investment casting for batch production. Sadhana 43: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Production EngineeringDr B R Ambedkar, National Institute of TechnologyJalandharIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringGuru Nanak Dev Engineering CollegeLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations