, 44:114 | Cite as

Application of image enhancement and mixture of Gaussian approach in combustion research

  • Litu Rout
  • Rajesh Sadanandan
  • Deepak MishraEmail author


Chemiluminescence is one of the most commonly used optical diagnostic techniques in combustion research where a line-of-sight projected information is generated from spatial fields. The exactness and uniqueness of reconstruction along with ease of implementation gives Abel inversion an edge over the other existing single-view reconstruction techniques for efficient estimation of spatial field from line-of-sight projections. Though there exist many such algorithms, the primary focus of these has been to ensure tractable inversion through a systematic regularization by imposing a smoothness constraint on discrete data points. But these techniques do not have the provision to process the input image prior to deconvolution in order to prevent accumulation of noise infiltrated during data acquisition. Another major limitation of these algorithms is to adopt the changes in characteristics of the input data points while maintaining optimal storage and time complexity. To address these issues, we have proposed a new image processing technique using standard Abel inversion for the application in combustion research. It provides a suitable model to ensure regularized inversion by imposing a smoothness constraint on acquired raw data. The new algorithm has been implemented to yield the physically significant chemiluminescence emission from hydroxyl radicals in flames from line-of-sight integrated images. The effectiveness of this algorithm is highlighted using exemplary OH chemiluminescence images captured from a standard swirl stabilized research burner.


Abel deconvolution image enhancement mixture of Gaussian swirl combustion optical diagnostics chemiluminescence 


  1. 1.
    Trupti K 2011 Reaction kinetics modeling of OH*, CH*, and C2* chemiluminescence. Ph.D. thesisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Najm H N, Paul P H, Mueller C J and Wyckoff P S 1998 On the adequacy of certain experimental observables as measurements of flame burning rate. Combust. Flame 113(3): 312–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ikeda Y, Kojima J and Nakajima T 2005 Basic aspects of oh(a), ch(a) and c2(d) chemiluminescence in the reaction zone of laminar methane-air premixed flames. Combust. Flame 140(1): 34–45Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boehly T R 1996 Abel inversion of emission and backlighting images. LLE Rev. 66: 66–72Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dasch C J 1992 One-dimensional tomography: a comparison of abel, onion-peeling, and filtered backprojection methods. Appl. Opt. 31(8): 1146–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tikhonov A N 1975 Inverse problems in heat conduction. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 29(1): 816–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simons S N and Yuan Z-G 2003 The filtered abel transform and its application in combustion diagnostics. 1995 Fall Meeting, Western States Section, sponsored by The Combustion Institute, Stanford, California, October 30–31, 1995Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daun Kyle J, Thomson Kevin A, Liu Fengshan and Smallwood Greg J 2006 Deconvolution of axisymmetric flame properties using tikhonov regularization. Appl. Opt. 45(19): 4638–4646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sizikov V S, Evseev V, Fateev A and Clausen S 2016 Direct and inverse problems of infrared tomography. Appl. Opt. 55(1): 208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abel N H 1827 Recherches sur les fonctions elliptiques. J. fur die reine und angewandte Math. 2: 101–181MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deutsch M and Beniaminy I 1982 Derivative-free inversion of abel’s integral equation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 41(1): 27–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsch M and Beniaminy I 1983 Inversion of abel’s integral equation for experimental data. J. Appl. Phys. 54(1): 137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gueron S and Deutsch S 1994 A fast abel inversion algorithm. J. Appl. Phys. 75(9): 4313–4318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petrou M and Petrou C 2010 Image processing: the fundamentals. Hoboken: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Moor B 1994 Total least squares for affinely structured matrices and the noisy realization problem. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 42(11): 3104–3113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Press William H, Flannery Brian P, Teukolsky Saul A and Vetterling William T 1989 Numerical recipes, volume 3. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dyn N 1989 Interpolation and approximation by radial and related functions. Approximation Theory VI, 1(s 1): 211–234Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross S M 2014 Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientist. India: Academic Press, New Delhi, 5 editionzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MATLAB Optimization Toolbox 2014b The mathworks inc. Natick, MA Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allen W M 1996 Algorithms, data structures, and problem solving with C++. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., InczbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarpala R, Burle N V S A, Voleti M and Sadanandan R 2017 Effect of swirl on the flame dynamics and pollutant emissions in an ultra-lean non-premixed model gt burner. Combust. Sci. Technol. 189(10): 1832–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willert C E and Gharib M 1991 Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp. Fluids 10(4): 181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sadanandan R, Kutne P, Steinberg A and Meier W 2012 Investigation of the syngas flame characteristics at elevated pressures using optical and laser diagnostic methods. Flow Turbul. Combust. 89(2): 275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AvionicsIndian Institute of Space Science and TechnologyThiruvananthapuramIndia
  2. 2.Department of AerospaceIndian Institute of Space Science and TechnologyThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations