Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 44:49 | Cite as

Multifocus image fusion based on waveatom transform

  • Meenu Manchanda
  • Deepak GambhirEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Multifocus image fusion has emerged as a challenging research area due to the availability of various image-capturing devices. The optical lenses that are widely utilized in image-capturing devices have limited ‘depth-of-focus’ and, therefore, only the objects that lie within a particular depth remain ‘in-focus’, whereas all the other objects go ‘out-of-focus’. In order to obtain an image where all the objects are well focused, multifocus image fusion method based on waveatom transform is proposed. The core idea is to decompose all input images using waveatom transform and perform fusion of resultant waveatom coefficients. The waveatom coefficients with higher visibility, corresponding to sharper image intensities, are used to perform the process of image fusion. Finally, the fused image is obtained by performing inverse waveatom transform. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated by performing fusion on different sets of multifocus images and comparing the results of the proposed method to the results of existing image fusion methods.

Keywords

Waveatom transform multifocus image fusion quality measures 

References

  1. 1.
    Stathaki T 2008 Image fusion: algorithms and applications. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li S, Kwok J T and Wang Y 2002 Multifocus image fusion using artificial neural networks. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 23: 985–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrawal D and Singhai J 2010 Multifocus image fusion using modified pulse coupled neural network for improved image quality. IET Image Process. 4: 443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manchanda M and Sharma R 2016 A novel method of multimodal medical image fusion using fuzzy transform. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 40: 197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang B, Jing Z L and Zhao H T 2010 Review of pixel-level image fusion. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 15: 6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li S and Yang B 2008 Multifocus image fusion using region segmentation and spatial frequency. Image Vis. Comput. 26: 971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wan T, Zhu C and Qin Z 2013 Multifocus image fusion based on robust principal component analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 34: 1001–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang W and Chang F 2011 A multi-focus image fusion method based on Laplacian pyramid. J. Comput. 6: 2559–2566Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahman S M M, Ahmad M O and Swamy M N S 2010 Contrast-based fusion of noisy images using discrete wavelet transform. IET Image Process. 4: 374–384MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manchanda M and Sharma R 2018 An improved multimodal medical image fusion algorithm based on fuzzy transform. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 51: 76–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ali F E et al 2008 Curvelet fusion of MR and CT images. Progress Electromagn. Res. 3: 215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J et al 2013 Image fusion with nonsubsampled contourlet transform and sparse representation. J. Electron. Imaging 22: 043019(1)–043019(15)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang L, Li B and Tian L 2013 A novel multi-modal medical image fusion method based on shift-invariant shearlet transform. Imaging Sci. J. 61: 529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demanet L and Ying L 2007 Wave atoms and sparsity of oscillatory patterns. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 23: 368–387MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boutella L and Serir A 2013 Fingerprint orientation map based on wave atoms transform. J. Image Gr. 1: 129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohammed A A et al 2010 An efficient fingerprint image compression technique based on wave atoms decomposition and multistage vector quantization. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 17: 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haddad, Z. et al 2013 Wave atoms based compression method for fingerprint images. Pattern Recognit. 46: 2450–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leung H Y and Cheng L M 2011 Robust watermarking scheme using wave atoms. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 1: 184817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li M, Cai W and Tan Z 2006 A region-based multi-sensor image fusion scheme using pulse-coupled neural network. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27: 1948–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shu-Long Z 2002 Image fusion using wavelet transform. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 34: 552–556Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hill P R, Canagarajah C N and Bull D R 2002 Image fusion using complex wavelets. In: Proceedings of BMVC, vol. 1, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh R and Khare A 2014 Fusion of multimodal medical images using Daubechies complex wavelet transform-a multiresolution approach. Inf. Fus. 19: 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Q and Guo B L 2009 Multifocus image fusion using the nonsubsampled contourlet transform. Signal Process. 89: 1334–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kotwal K and Chaudhuri S 2013 A novel approach to quantitative evaluation of hyperspectral image fusion techniques. Inf. Fus. 14: 5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar B S 2013 Multifocus and multispectral image fusion based on pixel significance using discrete cosine harmonic wavelet transform. Signal Image Video Process. 7: 1125–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Z et al 2004 Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13: 600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communications EngineeringVaish College of EngineeringRohtakIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communications EngineeringAmity School of Engineering and TechnologyBijwasan, New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations