# Simulation of free surface flows with non-hydrostatic pressure distribution

- 63 Downloads

## Abstract

In this work, a free surface flow simulator is developed in which Navier–Stokes equations using Marker and Cell (MAC) method in the framework of finite difference methodology have been solved. The free surface is tracked by the volume of fluid (VOF) method. The numerical code without free-surface is validated against the flow past a square cylinder. Three different free surface flows, i.e., dam break flow, two-dimensional cavity filling and undular bore, are studied to demonstrate the efficacy of the developed numerical model to simulate free surface flow. The numerical model used in the present work involves tracking of free surface of a single fluid in a two-fluid system. The parameters which can affect the interface orientation of the fluid is given as boundary condition at the interface. The inherent advantage of such numerical models is its ability to track free surface for high density and viscosity ratio fluids like air–water. The numerical model used in the present work is capable of solving such high density ratio two-fluid systems for which the effects due to surface tension are negligible. Results from all the problems are compared with earlier results available in literature.

## Keywords

Navier–Stokes equations volume of fluid method free surface flow dam break flow undular bore## List of symbols

*F*volume fraction of fluid

*g*acceleration due to gravity

- i, j
cell indices in x and y direction

*L*length scale

*p*pressure

*T*time scale

*u*streamwise component of velocity

*v*vertical component of velocity

*vol*(*F)*volume of fluid inside a cell

## Greek symbol

- \( \Delta t \)
time step

- \( \Delta x,\Delta y \)
grid size in x and y direction

## Non-dimensional numbers

*Fr*Froude number

*Re*Reynolds number

*St*Strouhal number

## References

- 1.Liggett J A 1994
*Fluid Mechanics*. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar - 2.Lighthill J 2001
*Waves in fluids*. South Asia edition: Cambridge University Press IndiaGoogle Scholar - 3.Stoker J J 2011
*Water waves: The mathematical theory with applications*(Vol. 36). New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar - 4.Chanson H 2010 Undular tidal bores: basic theory and free-surface characteristics.
*Journal of Hydraulic Engineering*136: 940–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Martin J C, Moyce W J, Price A T and Thornhill C K 1952 Part IV. An experimental study of the collapse of liquid columns on a rigid horizontal plane.
*Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A*, 244: 312–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Oertel M and Bung D B 2012 Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves: laboratory versus VOF.
*Journal of Hydraulic Research*50: 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Chaudhry M H 2007
*Open-channel flow*. 2nd edition, New York: Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar - 8.Basco D 1987 Introduction to rapidly-varied unsteady, free-surface flow computation.
*US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report*83–4284Google Scholar - 9.Mohapatra P K and Chaudhry M H 2004 Numerical solution of Boussinesq equations to simulate dam-break flows.
*Journal of Hydraulic Engineering*130: 156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Pohle F V 1952 Motion of water due to breaking of a dam, and related problems.
*Proc. Gravity Waves*47Google Scholar - 11.Rao P 2002 Contribution of Boussinesq pressure and bottom roughness terms for open channel flows with shocks.
*Applied Mathematics and Computation*133: 581–590MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Castro-Orgaz O, Giráldez J V and Ayuso J L 2008 Higher order critical flow condition in curved streamline flow.
*Journal of Hydraulic Research*46: 849–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Hager W H 2010 Comments on “Steady open channel flows with curved streamlines: The Fawer approach revised”.
*Environmental Fluid Mechanics*10: 491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.Devkota B H and Imberger J 2009 Lagrangian modeling of advection‐diffusion transport in open channel flow.
*Water Resources Research*45Google Scholar - 15.Zobeyer H and Steffler P 2012 Modelling plane open-channel flows by coupled depth-averaged and RANS equations.
*Journal of Hydraulic Research*50: 82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Harlow F H and Welch J E 1965 Numerical calculation of time‐dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface.
*Physics of Fluids*8: 2182–2189MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.Amsden A A and Harlow F H 1970 A simplified MAC technique for incompressible fluid flow calculations.
*Journal of Computational Physics*6: 322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Tome M F and McKee S 1994 GENSMAC: A computational marker and cell method for free surface flows in general domains.
*Journal of Computational Physics*110: 171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.Hirt C W and Nichols B D 1981 Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries.
*Journal of Computational Physics*39: 201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.Noh W F and Woodward P 1976 SLIC (simple line interface calculation). In:
*Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics*June 28–July 2, 1976 Twente University, Enschede (330–340). Springer.Google Scholar - 21.Youngs D L 1982 Time-dependent Multi-material Flow with Large Fluid Distortion.
*Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics*273–285Google Scholar - 22.Rudman M 1997 Volume-tracking methods for interfacial flow calculations.
*International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids*24: 671–691MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Osher S and Sethian J A 1988 Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations.
*Journal of Computational Physics*79: 12–49MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Sussman M, Smereka P and Osher S 1994 A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow.
*Journal of Computational Physics*114: 146–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Sussman M and Puckett E G 2000 A coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows.
*Journal of Computational Physics*162: 301–337MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.Olsson E and Kreiss G 2005 A conservative level set method for two phase flow.
*Journal of Computational Physics*210: 225–246MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.Van der Pijl S P, Segal A, Vuik C and Wesseling P 2005 A mass‐conserving Level‐Set method for modelling of multi‐phase flows.
*International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids*47: 339–361MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.Saha A K, Muralidhar K and Biswas G 2000 Transition and chaos in two-dimensional flow past a square cylinder.
*Journal of Engineering Mechanics*126: 523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.Hirt C W, Nichols B D and Romero N C 1975
*SOLA: A numerical solution algorithm for transient fluid flows (No. LA–5852)*. Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. Mex. (USA).Google Scholar - 30.Chorin A J 1967 A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems.
*Journal of Computational Physics*2: 12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 31.Mohapatra P K 1998
*Studies of Two Dimensional Free Surface flows With Non-hydrostatic Pressure Distribution*. Phd thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering IIT KanpurGoogle Scholar - 32.Sohankar A, Norberg C and Davidson L 1998 Low‐Reynolds‐number flow around a square cylinder at incidence: study of blockage, onset of vortex shedding and outlet boundary condition.
*International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids*26: 39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 33.Chen S, Johnson D B and Raad P E 1995 Velocity boundary conditions for the simulation of free surface fluid flow.
*Journal of Computational Physics*116: 262–276MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 34.Hirt C W and Shannon J P 1968. Free-surface stress conditions for incompressible-flow calculations.
*Journal of Computational Physics*2: 403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar