Advertisement

Sādhanā

, 44:25 | Cite as

Shock structures of underexpanded non-circular slot jets

  • T J S Jothi
  • K Srinivasan
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Flow visualization studies using shadowgraph technique are carried out to investigate the shock evolution from non-circular slot jets at various under-expansion levels. The non-circular topologies considered are triangular, square and elliptic, and the circular jet is taken as the baseline case for the study. These jets are underexpanded in the pressure ratio (R) range of 2–6 corresponding to a fully expanded jet Mach number up to 1.85. Results indicate that the shock cell structures of non-circular jets strongly depend upon the initial shape of the topology. The shock structures of triangular jet have additional secondary oblique shocks that are distinct from those of other non-circular jets. Mach disk is almost absent in a shock cell structure of triangular jet, which is unlike the case of other jets used in the study. The study suggests that square jet undergoes faster diffusion process compared with the triangular jet. Axis-switching phenomenon is predicted for the elliptical jet at a distance of 3–7 equivalent diameters.

Keywords

Triangular jets square jet elliptic jets shock structures shadowgraph 

References

  1. 1.
    Christ S, Sherman P M and Glass D R 1966 Study of the highly underexpanded sonic jet. AIAA J. 4: 68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powell A 1953 On the mechanism of choked jet noise. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 66: 1039–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adamson Jr T C and Nicholls J A 1959 On the structure of jets from highly underexpanded nozzles into still air. J. Aerosp. Sci. 26:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammit A G 1961 The oscillation and noise of an overpressure sonic jet. J. Aerosp. Sci. 28: 673–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimotakis P E 1986 Two-dimensional shear-layer entrainment. AIAA J. 24: 1791–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papamoschou D and Roshko A 1988 The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study. J. Fluid Mech. 197: 453–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinivasan K and Rathakrishnan E 2000 Studies on polygonal slot jets. AIAA J. 38: 1985–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gutmark E J and Grinstein F F 1999 Flow control with non-circular jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31: 239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quinn W R 1990 Mean flow and turbulence measurements in a triangular turbulent free jet. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 11: 220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutmark E, Schadow K C and Wilson K J 1991 Subsonic and supersonic combustion using non-circular injectors. J. Propul. Power 7: 240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vandsburger U and Ding C 1995 The spatial modulation of a forced triangular jet. Exp. Fluids 18: 239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schadow K C, Gutmark E, Parr D M and Wilson K J 1988 Selective control of flow coherence in triangular jets. Exp. Fluids 6: 129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quinn W R 2005 Measurements in the near flow field of an isosceles triangular turbulent free jet. Exp. Fluids 39: 111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quinn W R 2005 Near-field measurements in an equilateral triangular turbulent free jet. AIAA J. 43: 2574–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koshigoe S, Gutmark E, Schadow K C and Tubis A 1989 Initial development of non-circular jets leading to axis switching. AIAA J. 27: 411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quinn W R 1992 Turbulent free jet flows issuing from sharp-edged rectangular slots: The influence of slot aspect ratio. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 5: 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinn WR 1992 Streamwise evolution of a square jet cross-section. AIAA J. 30: 2852–2857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinn W R and Militzer J 1988 Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent free square jet. Phys. Fluids 31: 1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grinstein F F, Gutmark E and Parr T 1995 Near field dynamics of subsonic free square jets: a computational and experimental study. Phys. Fluids 7: 1483–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ai J J, Yu S C M, Law A W K and Chua L P 2005 Vortex dynamics in starting square water jets. Phys. Fluids 17: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussain F and Husain H S 1989 Elliptic jets. Part 1. Characteristics of unexcited and excited jets. J. Fluid Mech. 208: 257–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Husain H S and Hussain F 1991 Elliptic jets. Part 2. Dynamics of coherent structures: pairing. J. Fluid Mech. 233: 439–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Husain H S and Hussain F 1993 Elliptic jets. Part 3. Dynamics of preferred mode coherent structure. J. Fluid Mech. 248: 315–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ho C M and Gutmark E 1987 Vortex induction and mass entrainment in a small aspect ratio elliptic jet. J. Fluid Mech. 179: 383–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quinn W R 1989 On mixing in an elliptic turbulent free jet. Phys. Fluids A 1: 1716–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quinn W R and Marsters G F 1985 Upstream influence on turbulent jet from cruciform nozzles. Aeronaut. J. 89: 55–58Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mi J, Nathan G J and Nobes D S 2001 Mixing characteristics of axisymmetric free jets from a contoured nozzle, an orifice plate and a pipe. J. Fluids Eng. 123: 878–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norum T D and Seiner J M 1982 Broadband shock noise from supersonic jets. AIAA J. 20: 68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jothi T J S and Srinivasan K 2008 Acoustic characteristics of non-circular slot jets. Acta Acust. United Acust. 94: 229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology CalicutCalicutIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations