, 43:187 | Cite as

Role of working fluids on the cooling of discrete heated modules: a numerical approach

  • TAPANO KUMAR HOTTAEmail author


The study has focused on the role of working fluids (air, water and FC-72) on the cooling of discrete heated modules under free, forced and mixed convection medium. Three non-identical protruding discrete heat sources are arranged at different positions on a substrate board following golden mean ratio (GMR). Numerical simulations for these heat sources are carried out using a commercial software (ANSYS-Icepak R-15) to simulate their flow and temperature fields under three different modes of heat transfer. Results suggest that the temperature of the heat sources is a strong function of their size, position on the substrate board, the velocity of the fluid and type of working fluid used. A correlation has been proposed for the temperature of these heat sources keeping in mind their strong dependence on the afore-mentioned parameters. It has been found that water can be used for better heat removal from the heat sources due to its high boiling point. The whole idea gives a clear insight to the electronic cooling engineers regarding the selection of working fluids and modes of heat transfer for the cooling of electronic components.


ANSYS-Icepak discrete heat source forced convection mixed convection natural convection working fluids 


  1. 1.
    Peterson G P and Ortega A 1990 Thermal control of electronic equipment and devices. Adv. Heat Transf. 20: 181–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reynell M 1990 Major causes for failure of electronic components. U.S. Air Force Avionics Integrity ProgramGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lasance C J and Simons R E 2005 Advances in high-performance cooling for electronics. Electron. Cool. Mag. 11: 22–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Overholt M R, McCandless A, Kelly K W, Becnel C and Motakef S 2005 Micro-jet arrays for cooling of electronic equipment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ASME International Conference on Micro-channels and Mini-channels, pp. 249–252Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahaney H V, Incropera F P and Ramadhyani S 2007 Measurement of mixed-convection heat transfer from an array of discrete sources in a horizontal rectangular channel with and without surface augmentation. Exp. Heat Transf. 3: 215–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hotta T K, Muvvala P and Venkateshan S P 2013 Effect of surface radiation heat transfer on the optimal distribution of discrete heat sources under natural convection. Heat Mass Transf. 49: 207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fabbri M and Dhir V K 2005 Optimized heat transfer for high power electronic cooling using arrays of the microjet. ASME J. Heat Transf. 127: 760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang D, Yu E and Pezekwas A 1990 A computational study of two-phase jet impingement cooling of an electronic chip. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium, pp. 10–15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker E 1972 Liquid cooling of microelectronic devices by free and forced convection microelectronic and reliability. Microelectron. Reliab. 11: 213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leena R, Renjith R V and Prakash M J 2015 Experimental and numerical investigations on steady and unsteady jet impingement cooling for high power electronics. IEEE Trans. Components, Packag. Manuf. Technol. 5: 636–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heindel T J, Ramadhyani S and Incropera F R 1995 Conjugate natural convection from an array of discrete heat sources part-I – two and three dimensional model validations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 16: 501–510Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Incropera F P, Kerby J S, Moffatt D F and Ramadhyani S 1986 Convective heat transfer from discrete heat sources in a rectangular channel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 29: 1051–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joshi Y, Wilson T and Hazard S J 1989 An experimental study of natural convection cooling of an array of heated protrusions in a vertical channel in water. ASME J. Electron. Packag. 111: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma C S, Zimmermann S, Tiwari M K, Michel B and Poulikakos D 2012 Optimal thermal operation of liquid-cooled electronic chips. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 55: 1957–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhowmik H and Tou K W 2005 Study of transient forced convection heat transfer from discrete heat sources in an FC-72 cooled vertical channel. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 44: 499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park K A and Bergles A E 1987 Natural convection heat transfer characteristics of simulated microelectronic chips. ASME J. Electron. Packag. 109: 90–96Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu Y and Phan-Thien N 2000 An optimum spacing problem for three chips mounted on a vertical substrate in an enclosure. Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl. 37: 613–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roache P J 1994 Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J. Fluid Eng. 116: 405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    fluorinert-electronic-liquid-fc-72.pdf Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringVellore Institute of Technology (VIT)VelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations