Advertisement

\(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\), \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) and surface ozone over Lumbini Protected Zone, Nepal, during monsoon season of 2012

  • Kaushar AliEmail author
  • D K Trivedi
  • Dilip M Chate
  • Gufran Beig
  • Prodip Acharja
  • H K Trimbake
Article
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

Physical characterisation of \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\), \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) and surface ozone measured during the period from 17 July to 21 August 2012 at four strategic locations in and around the Lumbini Protected Zone, Nepal, is done to assess air quality of the region and understand qualitatively source mechanisms of these pollutants. The measurement locations are Panditarama Lumbini International Vipassana Meditation Centre, Parsahawa, Bhairahawa and Tilaurakot, representing monastic, industrial, urban and control areas, respectively. The overall average concentration of \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\) at these locations is \({\sim }19\pm 12\), \(35\pm 13\), \(35\pm 11\) and \(25\pm 6~ \upmu \hbox {g/m}^{3}\) and of \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) is \({\sim }25\pm 11\), \(103\pm 41\), \(58\pm 15\) and \(32\pm 7~ \upmu \hbox {g/m}^{3}\), respectively. \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\) never crosses the safe limit of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards of Nepal (NNAAQS) in the monastic and control areas but either crosses the NNAAQS occasionally or remains in its vicinity at the other two locations. The \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) concentration frequently exceeds the safe limit in the industrial area but not in the other remaining areas. The analysis indicates the dominance of the impact of local sources and boundary layer thickness on the atmospheric loadings of the particulate matter. The daily average mixing ratio of surface ozone remains normally low at all the four observational sites although the mixing ratio of ozone at Panditarama Lumbini International Vipassana Meditation Centre is much lower than the NNAAQS but higher than that observed at Tilaurakot.

Keywords

Lumbini global heritage air quality assessment particulate matter surface ozone 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Director, IITM, Pune, for his kind support and guidance for carrying out this work. The authors are also grateful to Mr Terrence Thompson, Sr Advisor, Environmental Health, WHO, Nepal, for funding; Dr Sudan Panthi, WHO, Nepal, for his suggestion and guidance during the measurements of air quality parameters in the LPZ; and Mr Rajesh Kohar, technical support person appointed for this campaign by WHO, Nepal. The meteorological data obtained from ECMWF-ERA Interim are also acknowledged. Special thanks go to Guruji Bhikkhu Vivekananda and Guruma Sayalay Bhaddamanika of the PMC and authorities of the Lumbini Development Trust, Nepal, who provided all possible support to this programme.

References

  1. Ali K, Beig G, Chate D M, Momin G A, Sahu S K and Safai P D 2009 Sink mechanism for significantly low level of ozone over the Arabian Sea during monsoon; J. Geophys. Res. 114 D17306,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brimblecombe P 2003 The Effects of Air Pollution on the Built Environment; Imperial College Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley P T and Birks J W 1995 Evaluation of visible-light photolysis of ozone water-cluster molecules as source of atmospheric hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide; Atmos. Environ. 29 2409–2415,  https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)91997-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burney J and Ramanathan V 2014 Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 111 16319–16324,  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317275111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colvile R N, Hutchinson E J, Mindell J S and Warren R F 2001 The transport sector as a source of air pollution; Atmos. Environ. 35 1537–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forouzanfar M H, Alexander L, Anderson H R, Bachman V F, Biryukov S, Brauer M, Burnett R, Casey D, Coates M M and Cohen A 2015 Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013; Lancet 386 2287–2323,  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuzzi S, Baltensperger U, Carslaw K, Decesari S, Denier Van Der Gon H, Facchini M C, Fowler D, Koren I, Langford B, Lohmann U and Nemitz E 2015 Particulate matter, air quality and climate: Lessons learned and future needs; Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 8217–8299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghio A J and Devlin R B 2001 Inflammatory lung injury after bronchial instillation of air pollution particles; Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164 704–708.Google Scholar
  9. Hibberd M F and Luhar A K 1996 A laboratory study and improved PDF model of fumigation into a growing convective boundary layer; Atmos. Environ. 30(21) 3633–3649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Nepal 2012 Environmental impact assessment of industrial development around Lumbini, the birthplace of the Lord Buddha, World Heritage Property, Report prepared for UNESCO, Kathmandu, Nepal, 8p.Google Scholar
  11. Ivaskova M, Kotes P and Bradman M 2015 Air pollution as important factor in construction materials deterioration in Slovak Republic; Proc. Eng. 108 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janssen N A H, Hoek G, Simic-Lawson M, Fischer P, Bree L, Brink H, Keuken M, Atkinson R W, Anderson H R, Brunkreef B and Cassee F R 2013 Black carbon as an additional indicator of the adverse health effects of airborne particles compared with \(\text{ PM }_{10}\) and \(\text{ PM }_{2.5}\); Environ. Health Perspect. 119 1691–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly J F and Fussell J C 2015 Air pollution and public health: Emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk; Environ. Geochem. Health 37 631–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohnen V A, Goldstein W and Wang W C 1993 Tropospheric ozone and climate change; Air Waste 43(10) 1332–1334,  https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicolas J, Yubero E, Galindo N, Gimenez J, Castaner R, Carratala A, Crespo J and Pastor C 2009 Characterization of events by aerosol mass size distribution; J. Environ. Monit. 11 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nishanth T, Ojha N, Satheesh Kumar M K and Naja M 2011 Influence of solar eclipse of 15 January 2010 on surface ozone; Atmos. Environ. 45 1752–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orru H, Ebi K L and Forsberg B 2017 The interplay of climate and air pollution on health; Curr. Environ. Health Report 4 504–513,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0168-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rupakheti D, Adhikary B, Praveen P S, Rupakheti M, Kang S, Mahata K S, Naja M, Zhang Q, Panday A K and Lawrence M G 2017 Pre-monsoon air quality over Lumbini, a world heritage site along the Himalayan foothills; Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 11041–11063,  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11041-2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shindell D, Kuylenstierna J C, Vignati E, van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z, Anenberg S C, Muller N, Janssens-Maenhout G and Raes F 2012  Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security; Science 335 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen S K, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V and Midgley P M 2013 IPCC: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis; In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 1535p.Google Scholar
  21. Turo F D, Proietti C, Screpanti A, Fornasier M F, Cionni I, Favero G and De Marco A 2016 Impacts of air pollution on cultural heritage corrosion at European level: What has been achieved and what are the future scenarios; Environ. Pollut. 218 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu S, Deng F, Wang X, Wei H, Shima M, Huang J, Lv H, Hao Y, Zheng C, Qin Y, Lu X and Guo X 2013 Association of lung function in a panel of young health adults with various chemical components of ambient fine particulate air pollution in Beijing, China; Atmos. Environ. 77 873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Tropical MeteorologyPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations