Advertisement

Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Peshawar District, Pakistan

  • Ahmad Hammad Khaliq
  • Muhammad Waseem
  • Sarfraz KhanEmail author
  • Waqas Ahmed
  • Muhammad Asif Khan
Article

Abstract

The seismic provisions for the Building Code of Pakistan were revised after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake and these have resulted in the introduction of a macrozonation ground motion hazard map in the seismic provisions. The macrozonation map proposes a peak ground acceleration (PGA) for the return period of 475 yr for Pakistan for flat rock sites. After the macrozonation, the next step is to develop the surface ground motion assessment studies for the cities, districts and tehsils of Pakistan. In this study, the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) approach is used for the Peshawar District. The PSHA, consistent with the classical Cornell approach, is carried out to obtain the seismic hazard curves and uniform hazard spectra of PGA values for the return periods of 150, 475, 975 and 2475 yr at a grid spacing of \(0.1{^{\circ }}\times 0.1{^{\circ }}\). The PGA for Peshawar at 150, 475, 975 and 2475 yr return period is estimated as 0.23, 0.34, 0.39 and 0.45g, respectively, for rock flat outcrop site conditions. The surface ground motion maps proposed in this study incorporate the local soil effects using amplification factors based on shear wave velocity obtained as a proxy to the topographic slope. The resultant ground surface hazard assessment proposes the PGA value of 0.63g for the return period of 475 yr and 0.89g for the return period of 2475 yr. The maps developed in the current study are important inputs for the structural designing, risk assessment and land use planning of the Peshawar District.

Keywords

Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment disaggregation site classification ground surface hazard assessment Peshawar 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of MS thesis at the National Centre of Excellence in Geology (NCEG), University of Peshawar. The instrumentation used in this study and all logistic support for the fieldwork was provided by the NCEG, which is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Abrahamson N A and Silva W J 2008 Summary of the Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground motion relations; Earthq. Spectra 24 67–97.Google Scholar
  2. Akkar S and Bommer J J 2007 Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East; Earthq. Eng. Struc. Dyn. 36 1275–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkar S and Bommer J J 2010 Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East; Seismol. Res. Lett. 81(2) 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambraseys N and Bilham R 2003 Earthquakes and associated deformation in northern Baluchistan 1892–2001; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93(4) 1573–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambraseys N and Bilham R 2009 The tectonic setting of Bamiyan and seismicity in and near Afghanistan for the past twelve centuries; In: The destruction of the giant Buddha statues in Bamiyan, central Afghanistan, UNESCO’s emergency activities for the recovering and rehabilitation of cliff and niches,UNESCO Special Publication (ed.) Margottini C 158 67–94, ISBN 978-448-0375-5.Google Scholar
  6. Ambraseys N N and Bommer J 1990 Uniform magnitude re-valuation for the strong-motion database of Europe and adjacent areas; Europ. Earthq. Eng. 4 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. Anbazhagan P 2013 Method for seismic microzonation with geotechnical aspects; Disas. Adv. 6(4) 66–86.Google Scholar
  8. Apel E, Burgmann R and Nagarajan B 2006 Geodetically constrained Indian plate motion and implications for plate boundary deformation; Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 85(52) T51B–1524, Fall meeting supplement.Google Scholar
  9. BCP 2007 Building code of Pakistan seismic provision; In: Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  10. Bhatia S C, Kumar M R and Gupta H K 1999 A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions; Ann. Geophys. 42 1153–1164.Google Scholar
  11. Bilham R 1998 Slip parameters for the Rann of Kachchh, India, 16 June 1819, earthquake, quantified from contemporary accounts; In: Coastal tectonics (eds) Stewart I S and Vita-Finzi C, Geol. Soc. London 146 295–318.Google Scholar
  12. Bilham R and Lodhi L 2010 Door Knockers of Mansurah: Strong shaking in a region of low perceived seismic risk, Sindh, Pakistan; Geol. Soc. Am. 471 29–37.Google Scholar
  13. Bilham R, Lodhi S, Hough S, Bukhary S, Khan A M and Rafeeqi S F A 2007 Seismic Hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: Uncertain past, uncertain future; Seismol. Res. Lett. 78(6).Google Scholar
  14. Boore D M and Atkinson G M 2008 Ground motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s; Earthq. Spectra. 24 99–138.Google Scholar
  15. Boore D M, Joyner W B and Fumal T E 1997 Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western north American earthquakes: A summary of recent work; Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 128–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borcherdt R D 1994 Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification); Earthq. Spectra 10(4) 617–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burbank D W and Raynolds R G H 1988 Stratigraphic keys to the timing of thrusting in terrestrial forland basins: Applications to the Northwestern Himalaya; In: News perspectives in basin analysis (eds) Kleinsphen J L and Paola C, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burbank W D and Tahirkhali R A 1985 The magneto stratigraphy, fission track dating and stratific evolution of the Peshawar Intra mountain Basin, Northern Pakistan; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 96 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burg J-P 2011 The Asia–Kohistan–India collision, review and discussion; In: Arc–continent collision: The making of an orogen, frontiers in earth sciences (eds) Brown D and Ryan P D, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Campbell K W and Bozorgnia Y 2008 NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s; Earthq. Spectra 24 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castellaro S and Mulargia F 2009 V\(_{\rm S30}\) Estimates Using Constrained H/V Measurements; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99(2A) 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen Z, Burchfiel B C, Liu Y, King R W, Royden L H, Tang W, Wang E, Zhao J and Zhang W 2000 GPS measurement from eastern Tibet and their implications for India/Eurasia intercontinental deformation; J. Geophys. Res. 105 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiou B and Youngs R R 2008 An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra; Earthq. Spectra. 24 173–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cornell C A 1968 Engineering seismic risk analysis; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58(5) 1583–1606.Google Scholar
  25. Cornell C A and Vanmarcke E H 1969 The major influences on seismic risk; In: Proc. Fourth World Conferences on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, A(1), pp. 69–93.Google Scholar
  26. DiPietro J A and Pogue K R 2004 Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of the Himalaya: A view from the west; Tectonics 23.Google Scholar
  27. Earle P S, Wald D J, Allen T I, Jaiswal K S, Porter K A and Hearne M G 2008 Rapid exposure and loss estimates for the May 12, 2008 mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake provided by the U.S. geological survey’s PAGER system; In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  28. Gansser A 1964 Geology of the Himalayas; Inter-Science Publication, London.Google Scholar
  29. Gardner J K and Knopoff L 1974 Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64(5) 1363–1367.Google Scholar
  30. Gutenberg B and Richter C F 1944 Frequency of earthquakes in California; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 4 185–188.Google Scholar
  31. Hartzell S, Carver D and Williams R A 2001 Site response, shallow shear-wave velocity, and damage in Los Gatos, California, from the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91(3) 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hashash Y M, Kim B, Olson S M and Ahmad I 2012 Seismic hazard analysis using discrete faults in northwestern Pakistan. Part I: Methodology and evaluation; J. Earthq. Eng. 16(7) 963–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heidarzadeh M, Pirooa M D, Zaker N H, Yalciner A C, Mokhtari M and Esmaeily A 2008 Historical tsunami in the Makran subduction zone off the southern coasts of Iran and Pakistan and results of numerical modeling; Ocean Eng. 35 774–786.Google Scholar
  34. Idriss I M 2008 An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes; Earthq. Spectra 24(S1) 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joyner W B and Boore D M 1993 Methods for regression analysis of strong-motion data; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83 469–487.Google Scholar
  36. Kazmi A H and Jan M Q 1997 Geology and tectonics of Pakistan; Graphic Publishers, Karachi, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  37. Khan S and Khan M A 2016 Mapping sediment thickness of the Islamabad city using empirical relationships: Implications for seismic hazards assessment; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 125(3) 623–644,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0675-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khan M A, Aslam M, Hussain A, Ashraf M and Afridi A G K 2006 Geological map of North West Frontier Province, Pakistan (Colored, Scale 1:1,000,000); Geological Survey of Pakistan (Map Series).Google Scholar
  39. Khan M A, Javed M W and Sayab M 2011 Fault map and associated database of fault parameters for Pakistan; WP-1 Interim Report, Earthquake Model of Middle East (EMME) International Project.Google Scholar
  40. Kramer S L 1996 Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Martin S and Szeliga W 2010 A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636–2009; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100(2) 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGuire R K 1976 FORTRAN Computer program for seismic risk analysis, US Geological Survey, open file report, pp. 76–67.Google Scholar
  43. MonaLisa, Khawaja A A and Jan M Q 2007 Seismic hazard assessment of NW Himalayan thrust belt using probabilistic approach; J. Earthq. Eng. 11 257–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naseer A, Khan A N, Hussain Z and Ali Q 2010 Observed seismic behavior of buildings in Northern Pakistan during the 2005 Kashmir earthquake; Earthq. Spectra 26(2) 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. NEHRP 1997 National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new building and other structures; Part-1: Provisions, building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  46. NORSAR and PMD 2006 Seismic Hazard analysis for the cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi; Pakistan Meteorological Department, 47p.Google Scholar
  47. Oldham T 1883 A catalog of Indian earthquakes; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 19 163–215.Google Scholar
  48. Ordaz M, Faccioli E, Martinelli F, Aguilar A, Arboleda J, Meletti C and D’Amico V 2015 CRISIS2015–Ver. 3.2: Program for computing seismic hazard; Instituto de Ingenieria, UNAM, Mexico.Google Scholar
  49. PMD and NORSAR 2007 Seismic Hazard Analysis and Zonation for Pakistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Meteorological Department, 153p.Google Scholar
  50. Quittmeyer R L, Farah A and Jacob K H 1979 The seismicity of Pakistan and its relation to surface faults; In: Geodynamics of Pakistan (eds) Farah A and DeJong K A, Geological Survey of Pakistan, Pakistan, pp. 271–284.Google Scholar
  51. Rafi Z, Lindholm C, Bungum H, Laghari H and Ahmed N 2012 Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and zonation of Pakistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir; Nat. Hazards 61 1317–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saeed Z and Warnitchai P 2012 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps for Pakistan; In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  53. Scordilis E M 2006 Empirical global relations converting \({M}_{{\rm s}}\) and \({m}_{{\rm b}}\) to moment magnitude; J. Seismol. 10(2) 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Searle M P, Khan M A, Fraser J E, Gough S J and Jan M Q 1999 The tectonic evolution of Kohistan–Karakoram collision belt along the Kohistan Highway transect, North Pakistan; Tectonics 18(6) 929–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaltegger U, Zeilionger G, Frank M and Burg J-P 2002 Multiple Mantle sources during Island arc magnetism U–Pb and Hf isotopic evidence from the Kohistan arc complex Pakistan; Terra Nova 44(6) 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shen Z K, Zhao C, Yin A, Li Y, Jackson D, Fang P and Dong D 2000 Contemporary crustal deformation in East Asia constrained by Global Positioning System measurement; J. Geophy. Res. 105 572–573.Google Scholar
  57. Tahirkheli R A 1982 Geology of the Himalaya, Karakorum, and Hindu Kush in Pakistan; Univ. Peshawar Geol. Bull. 15 51.Google Scholar
  58. Tahirkheli R A and Jan M Q 1979 A preliminary geological map of Kohistan and adjoining areas, N. Pakistan; Univ. Peshawar Geol. Bull. 11 187.Google Scholar
  59. Tinti S and Mulargia F 1985 Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog; Ann. Geophys. 3(3) 407–414.Google Scholar
  60. Trifunac M D 1989 Threshold magnitudes which cause ground motion exceeding the values expected during next 50 yr in a metropolitan area; Geofizika 6 1–12.Google Scholar
  61. Turnbull M L 2000 A discussion of the felt reports resulting from the Bundaberg earthquake, May 29 1997; In: Bundaberg: A regional perspective, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld, Centre for Social Science Research (eds) Neuenfeldt et al., pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
  62. Wald D J and Allen T I 2007 Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97(5) 1379–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waseem M, Spacone E and Lai C G 2018 Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan; Nat. Hazards 90(2) 563–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weichert D H 1980 Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70 1337–1346.Google Scholar
  65. Wills C J and Clahan K B 2006 Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(4A) 1483–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wills C J and Silva W 1998 Shear wave velocity characteristics of geologic units in California; Earthq. Spectra. 14(3) 533–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wills C J, Petersen M, Bryant W A, Reichle M, Saucedo G J, Tan S, Taylor G and Treiman J 2000 A site-conditions map for California based on geology and shear-wave velocity; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90(6B) 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yagci B and Ansal A 2009 Microzonation study in Balikesir; Teknik Dergi 20(1) 1313–1336.Google Scholar
  69. Yong A, Hough S E, Abrams M J, Cox H M, Wills C J and Simila G W 2008 Site characterization using integrated imaging analysis methods on satellite data of the Islamabad, Pakistan, region; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98(6) 2679–2693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang P Z, Yang Z-X, Gupta H K, Bhatia S C and Shedlock K M 1999 Global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP) in continent Asia; Annali di Geofisica 42(6) 1167–1190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre of Excellence in GeologyUniversity of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.University of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations