Advertisement

Mapping sediment thickness of the Abbottabad basin, Pakistan

  • Zahid Hussain
  • Sarfraz Khan
  • Muhammad Asif Khan
  • Muhammad Waseem
  • Waqas Ahmed
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

The Abbottabad basin is mainly composed of different loose and indurated sediments such as fine to medium grain silt and clay and large to medium sized boulders and cobbles, occupying a low land between the hills. These sediments are primarily stream deposits and variably compacted in the form of rock, suggested name Havelian group after their maximum thickness into Havelian area. Numerous streams converge at the Abbottabad intermontane basin from the north–northeast and join to form a single channel that passes through a narrow gorge on the western side of the Sirban hill. Geomorphically, the Abbottabad city is underlain by a thick sequence of loose Quaternary–Recent alluvial sediments, making it vulnerable to seismic hazards. This research determines the sediment thickness for the Abbottabad basin using a geophysical approach. In this regard, thirteen lithologic profiles were developed in the Abbottabad basin at different locations. These profiles were ultimately combined to develop a Fence diagram showing a generalized stratigraphic pattern of the Quaternary–Recent unconsolidated sediments in the basin. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and H/V analysis were used to characterize the site and shear wave velocity at a different location of Abbottabad basin and surrounding area. Based on H/V data (using Tromino Engy Plus instrument) Abbottabad basin and immediate surroundings have an average fundamental frequency from 0.5 to 9 Hz, which represents the deposition of alluvial sediments (i.e., stiff and dense soil).

Keywords

Fence diagram fundamental frequency sediment thickness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the M.Phil thesis at the National Centre of Excellence in Geology (NCEG), University of Peshawar. The instrumentation used in this study and all logistic support for the fieldwork were provided by the NCEG, which is gratefully acknowledged. Assistance in field and use of Grilla software by Ahmad Hammad Khaliq and Mian Luqman Hussain is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Albarello D, Cakir R and Walsh T J 2011 Testing joint application of HVSR ambient vibration measurements and MASW seismic survey in the Puget Lowland and Coastal Area, Washington; Seismol. Res. Lett. 82(2) 300.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez W 2010 Protracted continental collisions argue for continental plates driven by basal traction; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 296(3–4) 434–442.Google Scholar
  3. DiPietro J A and Pogue K R 2004 Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of the Himalaya: A view from the west; Tectonics 23,  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001554.
  4. Hussain A, Yeats R S and MonaLisa 2009 Geological setting of the 8 October, 2005 Kashmir earthquake; J. Seismol. 13(3) 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ibs-Von Seht M and Wohlenberg J 1999 Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89 250–259.Google Scholar
  6. Khan S and Khan M A 2016 Mapping sediment thickness of the Islamabad city using empirical relationships: Implications for seismic hazards assessment; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 125(3) 623–644,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0675-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Latif M 1970 Explanatory notes on the geology of southeastern Hazara to accompany the revised geological map; Jahrb Geol. Bundesanst 15 5–20.Google Scholar
  8. Grilla Software 2012 Software for passive/active surface wave analysis and modeling and vibration analysis, Italy (www.tromino.it).
  9. GSP 2002 Geological map of Abbottabad area NWFP, Pakistan; Map series Vol. III, no. 97, Scale 1:50,000, Issued by Gauhar S H, Director General, Geological Survey of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  10. MonaLisa, Khwaja A A and Jan M Q 2007 Seismic hazard assessment of the NW Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt, Pakistan, using probabilistic approach; J. Earthq. Eng. 11(2) 257–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakamura Y A 1989 A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface; Quarterly Rep. RTRI 30(1).Google Scholar
  12. NEHRP 1997 Commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Seeber L and Armbruster J 1979 Seismicity of the Hazara arc in northern Pakistan: Decollement vs. basement faulting; In: Geodynamics of Pakistan, Geological Survey of Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
  14. SESAME 2004 Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations; SESAME European Project.Google Scholar
  15. Shahzada K 2011 Seismic risk assessment of buildings in Pakistan; PhD Dissertation, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  16. Tahirkheli R K, Mattauer M, Proust F and Tapponnier P 1979 The India Eurasia suture zone in northern Pakistan: Synthesis and interpretation of recent data at plate scale; In: Geodynamics of Pakistan, Geological Survey of Pakistan, Quetta, pp. 125–130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre of Excellence in GeologyUniversity of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.University of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations