Audio-magnetotelluric investigation of sulfide mineralization in Proterozoic–Archean greenstone belts of Eastern Indian Craton

  • Shailendra Singh
  • Ved P Maurya
  • Roshan K Singh
  • Shalivahan Srivastava
  • Anurag Tripathi
  • P K Adhikari
Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Greenstone belts are well known for gold occurrences at different regions of the world. The Dhanjori basin in the eastern Singhbhum region shows major characteristics of a rifted greenstone belt. Initially, we conducted 14 audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) measurements for a profile of \(\sim \)20 km in the frequency range of 1 kHz to 10 Hz over this rather complex geologic environment covering Dhanjori Volcanics (DhV) and Kolhan Group (KG). Subsequently, gravity and magnetic surveys were also conducted over this AMT profile. The purpose of the survey was to identify and map conductive features and to relate them to metallogeny of the area along with the mapping of the basement of Dhanjori basin. The strike analysis showed \(\hbox {N30}^{\circ }\hbox {W}\) strike for DhV for all the frequencies and for sites over KG domain in the frequency range of 100–10 Hz, but for KG domain, the obtained strike in 1 kHz to 100 Hz is \(\hbox {N45}^{\circ }\hbox {E}\). As the combination of transverse electric (TE), transverse magnetic (TM) and tipper (Tzy) can recover the electrical signature in complex geological environment, we discuss the conductivity model obtained from TE+TM+Tzy only. The inversion was carried for the regional profile with 14 sites and for 7 sites over KG domain. Conductivity model shows two well resolved conductors, one each in KG and Quartz Pebble Conglomerate Dhanjori (QPCD) domains respectively showing common linked concordant features between these regional and KG profiles. The conductors are interpreted as sulfide mineralization linked with QPCD group of rocks which may host gold. These conductors are also horizontally disposed due to the intrusive younger Mayurbhanj Granite. These intrusives correlate well with the gravity modeling as well. The thickness of the Dhanjori basin at the central is about 3.0 km, similar to that from gravity modeling. The conductivity model also indicates the presence of shallow conductors, but could not be resolved due to lack of high frequency data. However, the results from the close-by drill site indicate the presence of shallow sulfide mineralization hosting gold. The deep level conductors delineated from AMT studies are associated with gravity high and low magnetic. ICP-AES results of Dhanjori samples show significant concentration of gold \(\sim \)5.0 g/t, which is of economic consideration. Thus, it can be inferred that the conductors have evidences of sulfide mineralization which host gold.

Keywords

Dhanjori volcanics greenstone belts audio–magnetotelluric conductors 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

SS conveys his sincere thanks to ISM, Dhanbad for providing all the supports to carry out this work. Authors are also thankful to UGC-CAS and DST-FIST for providing financial assistance to complete this work.

References

  1. Anand S P and Rajaram M 2006 Aeromagnetic data analysis for the identification of concealed uranium deposits: A case history from Singhbhum uranium province, India; EPS 58 1099–1103.Google Scholar
  2. Acharya S K, Gupta A and Orihashi Y 2010 Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic stratigraphy of the Dhanjori basin, Singhbhum Craton, eastern India and recording of a few U–Pb zircon dates from its basal part; J. Asian Earth Sci. 39 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anhaeusser C R 1976 Archean metallogeny in southern Africa; Econ. Geol. 71 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahr K 1991 Geological noise in magnetotelluric data: A classification of distortion types; Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 66 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beamish D and Travassos J M 1992 The use of the D+ solution in magnetotelluric interpretation; J. Appl. Geophys. 29 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craven J A, Roberts B J, Hayward N, Stefanescu M and Corriveau M 2013 A magnetotelluric survey and preliminary geophysical inversion and visualization of the NICO IOCG deposit, northwest territories; Geol. Surv. Can. Open File 7465, p. 25,  https://doi.org/10.4095/292869.
  7. Das L K and Agrawal B N P 2001 The evolution of the Singhbhum Craton, A geophysical perspective; Ind. Mineral. 55 143–170.Google Scholar
  8. Das L K, Dasgupta K K and De M K 2008 Mineral potential of Dhanjori Metavolcanics, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand; Ind. Mineral. 61 193–200.Google Scholar
  9. Das N, Royburman K J, Vatsa U S and Mahurkar YV 1990 Sonakhan Schist Belt: A Precambrian granite–greenstone complex; Geol. Surv. India Spec. Publ. 28 118–132.Google Scholar
  10. De Wit M J, Ashwal L D and Lewis D 1997 Greenstone belts; Clarendon Press, New York, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Dubé B and Gosselin P 2007 Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits; In: Mineral deposits of Canada: A synthesis of major deposit-types, District Metallogeny, the evolution of geological provinces, and exploration methods (ed.) Goodfellow W D, Geol. Assoc. Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Spec. Publ. 5 49–73.Google Scholar
  12. Dunn J A and Dey A K 1942 Geology and petrology of Eastern Singhbhum and surrounding areas; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 69.Google Scholar
  13. Eriksson P G, Mazumder R, Sarkar S, Bose P K, Altermann W vander and Merwe R 1999 The 2.7–2.0 Ga volcano-sedimentary record of Africa, India and Australia: Evidence for global and local changes in sea level and continental freeboard; Precamb. Res. 97 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster R P 1985 Major controls of Archean gold mineralization in Zimbabwe; Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa 88 109–133.Google Scholar
  15. Goldfarb R J, Groves D I and Gardoll S 2001 Orogenic gold and geologic time: A global synthesis; Ore Geol. Rev. 18 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groves D I, Phillips G N, Ho S E, Houstoun S M and Standing C A 1987 Craton-scale distribution of Archean greenstone gold deposits: Predictive capacity of the metamorphic model; Econ. Geol. 82 2045–2058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haque M D and Dutta S K 1996 Report on the investigation for gold in Dhanjori basin in East Singbhum District, Bihar, Unpublished Report (Geol. Surv. India).Google Scholar
  18. Heinson G S, Direen N G and Gill R M 2006 Magnetotelluric evidence for a deep-crustal mineralizing system beneath the Olympic Dam iron oxide copper-gold deposit, southern Australia; Geology 34 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jayananda M, Peucat J-J, Chardon D, Krishna Rao B and Corfu F 2013 Neoarchean greenstone volcanism, Dharwar craton, Southern India: constraints from SIMS zircon geochronology and Nd isotopes; Precamb. Res. 227 55–76,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jha V, Singh S and Venkatesh A S 2015 Invisible gold occurrence within the quartz reef pyrite of Babaikundi area, North Singhbhum fold-and-thrust belt, Eastern Indian Shield: Evidence from petrographic, SEM and EPMA studies; Ore Geol. Rev. 65 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones A G and Garcia X 2003 Okak Bay AMT data-set case study: lessons in dimensionality and scale; Geophysics 68 70–91,  https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1543195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kailasam L N 1975 Epeirogenic studies in India with reference to recent vertical movements; Tectonophys. 25 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirk J, Ruiz J, Chesley J, Walshe J and England G 2002 A major archean gold- and crust-forming event in theKaapvaal Craton, South Africa; Science 297 1856–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koziar A and Strangway D W 1978 Shallow crustal sounding in the Superior Province by audio frequency magnetotellurics; Can. J. Earth Sci. 15 1701–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishnamurthy P, Nagar R K, Bagchi A K and Gupta R K 2004 Geophysical surveys for concealed uranium deposits in the North Singhbhum Mobile Belt in Jharkhand and West Bengal; Explor. Res. Atomic Miner. 15 25–31.Google Scholar
  26. Livelybrooks D, Mareschalt M, Blais E and Smith J T 1996 Magnetotelluric delineation of the Trillabelle massive sulfide body in Sudbury, Ontario; Geophysics 61 971–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maurya V P, Shalivahan, Bhattacharya B B, Adhikari P K and Das L K 2015 Preliminary magnetotelluric results across Dalma Volcanics, Eastern India: Inferences on metallogeny; J. Appl. Geophys. 115 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazumder R, Bose P K and Sarkar S 2000 A commentary on tectono-sedimentary record of the pre-2.0 Ga continental growth of India vis-a-vis a pre-Gondwana Afro-Indian supercontinent; J. Africa Earth Sci. 30 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazumder R and Sarkar S 2004 Sedimentation history of the Palaeoproterozoic Dhanjori Formation, Singhbhum, eastern India; Precamb. Res. 130 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazumder R 2005 Proterozoic sedimentation and volcanism in the Singhbhum crustal province, India and their implications; Sedim. Geol. 176 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meju M A 2002 Geoelectromagnetic exploration for natural resources: Models, case studies and challenges; Surv. Geophys. 23 133–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Park S K and Torres-Verdin C 1988 A systematic approach to the interpretation of magnetotelluric data in volcanic environments with applications to the quest for magma in long valley, California; J. Geophys. Res. B93 13,265–13,283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Percival J A 2007 Geology and metallogeny of the superior province, Canada; In: Mineral deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Type (ed.) Goodfellows W D, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods. Ontario, Geol. Assoc. Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Spec. Publ. 5 903–928.Google Scholar
  34. Pirajno F 2007 Mantle plumes, associated intra plate tectonomagmatic processes and ore systems; Episodes 30 6–19.Google Scholar
  35. Queralt P, Jones A G and Ledo J 2007 Electromagnetic imaging of a complex ore body: 3D forward modeling, sensitivity tests, and down-mine measurements; Geophysics 72 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodi W and Mackie R L 2001 Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion; Geophysics 66 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saha A K 1994 Crustal evolution of Singhbhum–North Orissa, eastern India; Geol. Soc. India Memoir 27.Google Scholar
  38. Sahoo P R and Venkatesh A S 2014 ‘Indicator’ carbonaceous phyllite/graphitic schist in the Archean Kundarkocha gold deposit, Singhbhum orogenic belt, eastern India: Implications for gold mineralization vis-a-vis organic matter; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 123 1693–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sengupta D, Kumar R, Singh A K and Prasad R 2001 Radon exhalation and radiometric prospecting on rocks associated with Cu–U mineralizations in the Singhbhum shear zone, Bihar; Appl. Radiat. Isot. 55 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shalivahan Sinharay R K and Bhattacharya B B 2006 Remote reference magnetotelluric impedance estimation of wideband data using hybrid algorithm; J. Geophys. Res. 111 B11103–B11109.Google Scholar
  41. Siripunvaraporn W and Egbert G 2000 An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data; Geophysics 65 791–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siripunvaraporn W and Egbert G 2009 WSINV3DMT: Vertical magnetic field transfer function inversion and parallel implementation; Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 173 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spies B R 1989 Depth of investigation in electromagnetic sounding methods; Geophysics 54 872–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sproule R A, Lesher C M, Ayer J A and Thurston P C 2002 Komatiites and komatiitic basalt of the Abitibi greenstone belt: A proposed model for their formation; Precamb. Res. 115 153–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sutarno D and Vozoff K 1991 Phase-smoothed robust M-estimation of magnetotelluric impedance functions; Geophysics 56 1999–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Swift C M 1967 A magnetotelluric investigation of an electrical conductivity anomaly in the south western United States; PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Tuncer V, Unsworth M J, Siripunvaraporn W and Craven J A 2006 Exploration for unconformity-type uranium deposits with audiomagnetotelluric data: A case study from the McArthur River mine, Saskatchewan, Canada; Geophysics 71 B201–B209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Türkoğlu E, Unsworth M, Bulut F and Çağlar İ 2015 Crustal structure of the North Anatolian and East Anatolian Fault Systems from magnetotelluric data; Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 241 1–14,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2015.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thiel S and Heinson G S 2010 Crustal imaging of a mobile belt using magnetotellurics: An example of the Fowler domain in south Australia; J. Geophys. Res. 115 B06102–B06109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verma R K, Rao R U M and Gupta M L 1966 Terrestrial heat flow in Mosabani Mine, Singhbhum District, Bihar, India; J. Geophys. Res. 71 4943–4948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verma R K, Sharma A U S and Mukhopadhyay M 1984 Gravity field over Singhbhum, its relationship to geology and tectonic history; Tectonophys. 106 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weidelt P 1972 The inverse problem of geomagnetic induction; Z. Geophys. 38 257–289.Google Scholar
  53. Wyche S, Fiorentini M L, Miller J L and McCuaig T C 2012 Geology and controls on mineralisation in the Eastern Goldfields region, Yilgarn Craton, western Australia; Episodes 35 273–282.Google Scholar
  54. Yamaguchi S, Ogawa Y, Fujita K, Ujihara N, Inokuchi H and Oshiman N 2010 Audio-frequency magnetotelluric imaging of the Hijima fault, Yamasaki fault system, southwest Japan; EPS 62 401–411.Google Scholar
  55. Zhang P, Chouteau M, Mareschal M, Kurtz R and Hubert C 1995 High-frequency magnetotelluric investigation of crustal structure in north-central Abitibi, Quebec, Canada; Geophys. J. Int. 120 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhou T, Goldfarb R J and Phillips G N 2002 Tectonics and distribution of gold deposits in China – An overview; Miner. Depos. 37 249–282,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-001-0237-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shailendra Singh
    • 1
  • Ved P Maurya
    • 1
  • Roshan K Singh
    • 1
  • Shalivahan Srivastava
    • 1
  • Anurag Tripathi
    • 1
  • P K Adhikari
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Geophysics, Centre of Advanced StudyIndian School of MinesDhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Uranium Corporation of India Ltd.NarwapaharIndia

Personalised recommendations