Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, 44:145 | Cite as

Investigation of axonal regeneration of Triturus ivanbureschi by using physiological and proteomic strategies

  • Seçil Karahisar Turan
  • Mehmet Ali Onur
  • Fatma Duygu Özel DemiralpEmail author
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries are frequently observed and successful treatment depends mainly on the injury type, location of the damage, and the elapsed time prior to treatment. The regenerative capacity is limited only to the embryonic period in many mammalian tissues, but urodele amphibians do not lose this feature during adulthood. The main purpose of this study is to define the recovery period after serious sciatic nerve damage of a urodele amphibian, Triturus ivanbureschi. Experimental transection damage was performed on the sciatic nerves of T. ivanbureschi specimens. The recovery period of sciatic nerves were investigated by walking track analysis, electrophysiological recordings, and bottom-up proteomic strategies at different time points during a 35-day period. A total of 34 proteins were identified related to the nerve regeneration process. This study showed that the expression levels of certain proteins differ between distal and proximal nerve endings during the regeneration period. In distal nerve stumps, transport proteins, growth factors, signal, and regulatory molecules are highly expressed, whereas in proximal nerve stumps, neurite elongation proteins, and cytoskeletal proteins are highly expressed.

Keywords

Axonal regeneration electrophysiology proteomics urodele walking track analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) [Grant Number 113Z124] and is also part of a doctorate thesis (Seçil Karahisar Turan, Hacettepe University, Institute of Science). We are grateful to Dr. Ali Demirsoy for his great, ad hoc counseling. We also thank Beycan Ayhan, Hatice Yıldızhan, Naşit İğci, N. Pınar Barkan and Selen Peker for technical expertise. This study was funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) [Grant Number 113Z124].

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All Triturus ivanbureschi specimens were collected from their natural habitats with the permission of the Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks (protocol B.23.0.DMP.0.15.01-510.02-9165). All experimental procedure was approved by Hacettepe University Animal Research Ethics Committee (protocol B.30.2.HAC.0.05.06.00/17).

References

  1. Alvarado AS and Tsonis PA 2006 Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain J, Mackinnon S and Hunter D 1989 Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 83 129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bervar M 2000 Video analysis of standing–an alternative footprint analysis to assess functional loss following injury to the rat sciatic nerve. J. Neurosci. Methods 102 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacherjee A, Liao Z and Smith PG 2014 Trophic factor and hormonal regulation of neurite outgrowth in sensory neuron-like 50B11 cells. Neurosci. Lett. 558 120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson B 2007 Principles of regenerative biology (Academic Press, USA)Google Scholar
  6. Carlton J and Goldberg N 1986 Quantitating integrated muscle function following reinnervation. Surg. Forum 3 611–612Google Scholar
  7. de Medinaceli L, Freed WJ, Wyatt RJ 1982 An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp. Neurol. 77 634–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einheber S, Hannocks M-J, Metz CN, Rifkin DB and Salzer JL 1995 Transforming growth factor-beta 1 regulates axon/Schwann cell interactions. J. Cell Biol. 129 443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eswarakumar V, Lax I and Schlessinger J 2005 Cellular signaling by fibroblast growth factor receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 16 139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu SY and Gordon T 1997 The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration. Mol. Neurobiol. 14 67–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goto A, Wang YL, Kabuta T, Setsuie R, Osaka H, Sawa A, Ishiura S and Wada K 2009 Proteomic and histochemical analysis of proteins involved in the dying-back-type of axonal degeneration in the gracile axonal dystrophy (gad) mouse. Neurochem. Int. 54 330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grothe C and Nikkhah G 2001 The role of basic fibroblast growth factor in peripheral nerve regeneration. Anat. Embryol. 204 171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karahisar Turan S, Ali Onur M, Demirsoy A and Ozel Demiralp, D 2015 Proteomic comparison of damaged sciatic nerves of a newt, Triturus karelinii (Amphibia: Urodela) during the first 24th hour of regeneration period. Curr. Proteomics 12 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karamoysoyli E, Burnand RC, Tomlinson DR and Gardiner NJ 2008 Neuritin mediates nerve growth factor–induced axonal regeneration and is deficient in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 57 181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiffmeyer WR, Tomusk EV and Mescher AL 1991 Axonal transport and release of transferrin in nerves of regenerating amphibian limbs. Dev. Biol. 147 392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kropf N, Krishnan K, Chao M, Schweitzer M, Rosenberg Z and Russell SM 2010 Sciatic nerve injury model in the axolotl: functional, electrophysiological, and radiographic outcomes: Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. 112 880–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N and Aster J 2010 Tissue renewal, regeneration and repair pathologic basis of disease 8th edn (Elsevier, Philadelphia) pp79–110Google Scholar
  18. Loyet KM, Kowalchyk JA, Chaudhary A, Chen J, Prestwich GD and Martin TF 1998 Specific binding of phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate to calcium-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS), a potential phosphoinositide effector protein for regulated exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 273 8337–8343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu A, Wiśniewski JR, Mann M 2009 Comparative proteomic profiling of membrane proteins in rat cerebellum, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve. J. Proteome Res. 8 2418–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melcangi RC et al. 2005 Peripheral nerves: a target for the action of neuroactive steroids. Brain Res. Rev. 48 328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michaelevski I, Medzihradszky KF, Lynn A, Burlingame AL and Fainzilber M 2010 Axonal transport proteomics reveals mobilization of translation machinery to the lesion site in injured sciatic nerve. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9 976–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peker S, Akar N, Demiralp DO 2012 Proteomic identification of erythrocyte membrane protein deficiency in hereditary spherocytosis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39 3161–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira-Leal JB and Seabra MC 2001 Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313 889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodríguez FJ, Valero-Cabré A and Navarro X 2004 Regeneration and functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Models 1 177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarikcioglu L, Demirel B and Utuk A 2009 Walking track analysis: an assessment method for functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in the rat. Folia Morphol. (Warsz) 68 1–7Google Scholar
  26. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M 1996 Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68 850–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shimada T, Sugiura H and Yamagata K 2013 Neuritin: A therapeutic candidate for promoting axonal regeneration. World J. Neurol. 3 138–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan Y, Low KG, Boccia C, Grossman J and Comb MJ 1994 Fibroblast growth factor and cyclic AMP (cAMP) synergistically activate gene expression at a cAMP response element. Mol. Cell Biol. 14 7546–7556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tedeschi A 2012 Tuning the orchestra: transcriptional pathways controlling axon regeneration. Front Mol. Neurosci. 4 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsonis PA 2002 Regenerative biology: the emerging field of tissue repair and restoration. Differentiation 70 397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vleggeert-Lankamp CL 2007 The role of evaluation methods in the assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration through synthetic conduits: a systematic review. J. Neurosurg. 107 1168–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vogel RO, Janssen RJ, van den Brand MA, Dieteren CE, Verkaart S, Koopman WJ, Willems PH, Pluk W, van den Heuvel LP, Smeitink JA and Nijtmans LG 2007 Cytosolic signaling protein Ecsit also localizes to mitochondria where it interacts with chaperone NDUFAF1 and functions in complex I assembly. Genes Dev. 21 615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wielstra B and Arntzen J 2016 Description of a new species of crested newt, previously subsumed in Triturus ivanbureschi (Amphibia: Caudata: Salamandridae). Zootaxa 4109 73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang F, Clarke J, Santos-Ruiz L and Ferretti P 2002 Differential regulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors in the regenerating amphibian spinal cord in vivo. Neuroscience 114 837–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zimmermann H 1996 Biochemistry, localization and functional roles of ecto-nucleotidases in the nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 49 589–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zochodne DW 2008 Neurobiology of peripheral nerve regeneration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seçil Karahisar Turan
    • 1
  • Mehmet Ali Onur
    • 1
  • Fatma Duygu Özel Demiralp
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations