Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, 44:13 | Cite as

Nest architecture and colony characteristics of Meliponula (Axestotrigona) ferruginea (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) in Cameroon

  • Moses Tita Mogho NjoyaEmail author
  • Seino Richard Akwanjoh
  • Dieter Wittmann
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Stingless bees have evolved adaptive nest constructions strategies which have resulted in sophisticated nest architecture in many species while others lack certain structural components. However, no information exists on the nest biology and ecology on the genus Meliponula in Cameroon. This study aims to contribute to knowledge on the nest architecture and colony characteristics of Meliponula (Axestotrigona) ferruginea. Meliponula ferruginea belongs to the genus Meliponula and subgenus Axestotrigona. This species was first described by Le Peletier De Saini-Farrgeau (1836) and Michener (The bees of the world, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 2000) recently. In Cameroon the species has been collected in the northern parts of the country, but there has been no attempt to describe the nest architecture. Our stingless bee survey from the Bamenda highlands afromontane forests of Cameroon reveals that this species can either nest in tree trunks or in abandoned traditional hollow hives. Interestingly, 50% of colonies studied nested in traditional hollow hives originally baited for honeybees (Apis mellifera adansonii). The nest entrance of Meliponula (Axestotrigona) ferruginea ranged from 1 to 1.5 cm (1.2±0.0.24 cm) in diameter, while the external entrance tube extended up to 1.6±0.0.4 cm and the nest entrance tube can go up to 5 cm inward in depending on the thickness of the tree trunk. The nest is made up of sticky brown 5–7 (6±0.98) involucra sheets. The size of brood area depends on the age and condition of the nest. The length of the nest could be between 5.5 and 7.6 cm (6.8±0.98 cm) and up to 13± 4.16 cm combs with a comb diameter of about 7.5±1.29 cm. The cells and storage pots are oval in shape but the storage pots are much larger, about 3 times the size of cell. Generally, this study shows a lot of similarities with other previously studied species in terms of the nest characteristics and measurements. However, the above characteristics can be very useful in taxonomical, phylogenetic and ecological studies of M. ferruginea.

Keywords

Cameroon Meliponini Meliponula ferruginea nest architecture stingless bees 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the hunters and beekeepers in the study area for their assistance in locating nesting sites of M. ferruginea and to David Roubik for identification of the bees.

References

  1. Abramson CI, Mixson TA, Cakmak I, Place AJ and Wells H 2007 Determinants of sting-less bee nest density in lowland dipterocarp forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia. 131 22927–22934Google Scholar
  2. Eardley CD 2004 Taxonomic revision of the African stingless bees (Apoidea: Apidae: Apinae: Meliponini). African Plant Protect. 10 63–96Google Scholar
  3. Eltz T, Carsten AB, Van der Kaars S and Linsenmair EK 2002 Determinants of sting-less bee nest density in lowland dipterocarp forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia 131 27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kajobe R and Roubik DW 2006 Honey-making bee colony abundance and predation by apes and humans in a Uganda forest reserve. Biotropica 38 210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Le Peletier De Saini-Farrgeau ALM 1836 Histoire naturelle des Insectes Google Scholar
  6. Michener CD 2000 The bees of the world (The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London)Google Scholar
  7. Njoya MTM 2009 Diversity of stingless bees in Bamenda afromontane forests –Cameroon: Nest architecture, behaviour and labour calendar. Dissertation, Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu BonnGoogle Scholar
  8. Njoya MTM, Wittmann D and Ambebe TF 2016 Nest Architecture of Dactylurina Staudingeri (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) in Cameroon. Int. J. Res. Agric. Sci. 3 2348–3997Google Scholar
  9. Njoya MTM, Wittmann D and Balgah RA 2017a Subterranean Nest Architecture and Colony Characteristics of Meliponula (Meliplebeia) becarii (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) in Cameroon. J. Chem. Bio. Phy. Sci. 7 220–233Google Scholar
  10. Njoya MTM, Wittmann D and Anjah GM 2017b Recruitment communication strategy of workers of Dactylurina staudingeri (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) in Cameroon. JCBPS 7 234–242Google Scholar
  11. Roubik DW 1980 Foraging behaviour of competing Africanized honey bees and stingless bees. Ecology 61 836–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roubik DW 1983 Nest and colony characteristics of stingless bees from Panama. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 56 327–335Google Scholar
  13. Roubik DW 2006 Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37 124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Slaa J 2003 Foraging ecology of stingless bees: From individual behaviour to community ecology. Dissertation Utrecht University, Dissertation, Elinkwijk, Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Slaa EJ, Chaves LAS, Malagodi-Braga KS and Hofstede FE 2006 Stingless bees in applied pollination: practice and perspectives. Apidologie 37 293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Willie A 1979 Phylogeny and relationships among the genera and subgenera of the stingless bees (Meliponine) of the world. Rev. Biol. Trop. 27 241–277Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moses Tita Mogho Njoya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seino Richard Akwanjoh
    • 1
  • Dieter Wittmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceThe University of BamendaBamendaCameroon
  2. 2.Institute of Landscape and Animal EcologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations