Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 959–967 | Cite as

On-demand release of ciprofloxacin from a smart nanofiber depot with acoustic stimulus

  • Sajedeh Khorshidi
  • Akbar KarkhanehEmail author


Herein, an antibiotic-loaded electrospun scaffold with improved drug delivery via acoustic stimulation has been developed. Ultrasound stimulus with an intensity of 15 W/cm2, duty-cycle of 50% and duration of 10 min was repeatedly applied to ciprofloxacin loaded alginate fibers. Ultrasonication with the aforesaid conditions increased drug release from scaffold probably due to disturbance of ionic crosslinks of alginate network. Scaffolds exposed to acoustic stimulus revealed higher antibacterial activity compared to those with no stimulus. Interestingly, antibiotic release radically increased and antibacterial function improved as ultrasound perturbed scaffold framework, but scaffold integrity was regained once the ultrasound probe was retracted.


Alginate antibiotic electrospinning fiber ultrasound 



  1. Baghbani F, Chegeni M, Moztarzadeh F, Hadian-ghazvini S and Raz M 2017 Novel ultrasound-responsive chitosan/perfluorohexane nanodroplets for image-guided smart delivery of an anticancer agent: Curcumin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 74 186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayramov DF and Neff JA 2016 Beyond conventional antibiotics—new directions for combination products to combat biofilm. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 112 48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boissenot T, Bordat A, Fattal E and Tsapis N 2016 Ultrasound-triggered drug delivery for cancer treatment using drug delivery systems: from theoretical considerations to practical applications. J. Control. Release 241 144–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gürbay A, Garrel C, Osman M, Richard MJ, Favier A and Hincal F 2002 Cytotoxicity in ciprofloxacin-treated human fibroblast cells and protection by vitamin E. Human Exp. Toxicol. 21 635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huebsch N, Kearney CJ, Zhao X, Kim J, Cezar CA, Suo Z and Mooney DJ 2014 Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 9762–9767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kataria K, Gupta A, Rath G, Mathur RB and Dhakate SR 2014 In vivo wound healing performance of drug loaded electrospun composite nano fibers transdermal patch. Int. J. Pharmaceut. 469 102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khorshidi S and Karkhaneh A 2016 A self-crosslinking tri-component hydrogel based on functionalized polysaccharides and gelatin for tissue engineering applications. Mater. Lett. 164 468–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khorshidi S and Karkhaneh A 2018 Hydrogel/fiber conductive scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 106 718–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kost J, Leong K and Langer R 1989 Ultrasound-enhanced polymer degradation and release of incorporated substances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 7663–7666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lajunen T, Kontturi LS, Viitala L, Manna M, Cramariuc O, Róg T, Bunker A, Laaksonen T, et al 2016 Indocyanine green loaded liposomes for light triggered drug. Mol. Pharm. 13 2095–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence JW, Claire DC, Weissig V and Rowe TC 1996 Delayed cytotoxicity and cleavage of mitochondrial DNA in ciprofloxacin-treated mammalian cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 50 1178–1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawrie G, Keen I, Drew B, Chandler-temple A, Rintoul L, Fredericks P and Grøndahl L 2007 Interactions between alginate and chitosan biopolymers characterized using FTIR and XPS. Biomacromolecules 8 2533–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu J, Detrembleur C, De Pauw-Gillet MC, Mornet S, Elst LV, Laurent S, Jérôme C and Duguet E 2014. Heat-triggered drug release systems based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles filled with a maghemite core and phase-change molecules as gatekeepers. J. Mater. Chem. 2 59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Papich MG 2016 Saunders Handbook of Veterinary Drug, 4th EditionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pitt WG, Husseini GA and Staples BJ 2006 Ultrasonic drug delivery—a general review. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 1 37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajamanickam R, Baek S, Gwon K, Hwang Y, Shin K and Tae G 2016 Mechanical stimuli responsive and highly elastic biopolymer/nanoparticle hybrid microcapsules for controlled release. J. Mater. Chem. B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sahoo S, Chakraborti CK and Mishra SC 2011 Qualitative analysis of controlled release ciprofloxacin/carbopol 934 mucoadhesive suspension. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sammeta SM, Vaka SR and Murthy SN 2010 Transcutaneous electroporation mediated delivery of Doxepin–HPCD complex: a sustained release approach for treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. J. Control. Release 142 361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Torres-giner BS, Martinez-Abad A, Gimeno-Alcan JV, Ocio MJ and Lagaron JM 2012 Controlled delivery of gentamicin antibiotic from bioactive electrospun polylactide-based ultrathin fibers. Adv. Eng. Mater. 4 112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Valentin R, Horga R, Bonelli B, Garrone E, Renzo FD and Quignard F 2005 Acidity of alginate aerogels studied by FTIR spectroscopy of probe molecules. Macromol. Symp. 230 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang J, Liu Q, Tian Y, Jian Z, Li H and Wang K 2015 Biodegradable hydrophilic polyurethane PEGU25 loading antimicrobial peptide Bmap-28: a sustained-release membrane able to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation in vitro. Sci. Rep. 5 1–7Google Scholar
  22. Xiong D, Yao N, Gu H, Wang J and Zhang L 2017. Stimuli-responsive shell cross-linked micelles from amphiphilic four-arm star copolymers as potential nanocarriers for “pH/redox-triggered” anticancer drug release. Polymer 114 161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering FacultyAmirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations