Factors that impact the outcomes in testicular germ cell tumors in low–middle-income countries
Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are one of the most common tumors in adolescents and young adults. There is paucity of data on GCT from low–middle-income countries (LMIC). The present study was conducted to assess the demographic features, clinical manifestations, pathology, and outcomes of GCT patients treated at our center. Patients with testicular GCT above the age of 18 years, treated at our center from 2001 to 2015 were included in the study. Data were extracted retrospectively from the case records. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the variables were compared using the log-rank test. The study included 421 patients among whom 128 (30%) had a histological diagnosis of seminoma and 293 (70%) had non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Metastatic disease at presentation was observed in 83/128 (65%) with seminoma and 254/293 (87%) with NSGCT. According to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk stratification for metastatic disease, good- and intermediate-risk seminoma were observed in 55/83 (66%) and 28/83 (34%) patients, respectively, and good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk NSGCT were observed in 82/254 (32%), 76/254 (30%), and 96/254 (38%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up was 32.3 months (range 0.03–200 months). The 3-year OS for the entire cohort was 80.3%. The 3-year OS for seminoma was 91.4%, and for NSGCT was 75.3%. Factors significantly associated with inferior EFS and OS on multivariate analysis included poor performance status, scrotal orchidectomy, carboplatin-based regimen, NSGCT histology, and treatment default. Patients with testicular GCT in India present in an advanced stage and higher IGCCCG risk compared to Western data. Factors unique to LMIC like treatment default, bulky disease, dose compromise, and scrotal orchidectomy have a negative impact on the outcome.
KeywordsTesticular cancer Germ cell tumor Seminoma NSGCT IGCCCG risk
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent and ethical approval
The study is retrospective in nature and therefore ethics committee approval and patient consent are not required as per Cancer Institute ethics committee policy.
- 5.Culine S, Kerbrat P, Kramar A, Théodore C, Chevreau C, Geoffrois, et al. Refining the optimal chemotherapy regimen for good-risk metastatic non seminomatous germ-cell tumors: a randomized trial of the Genito-Urinary Group of the French Federation of Cancer Centers (GETUG T93BP). Ann Oncol. 2007;18:917–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.de Wit R, Stoter G, Kaye SB, Sleijfer DT, Jones WG, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular nonseminoma: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1837–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Oliver RT, Mead GM, Rustin GJ, Joffe JK, Aass N, Coleman R, et al. Randomized trial of carboplatin versus radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: mature results on relapse and contralateral testis cancer rates in MRC TE19/EORTC 30982 study (ISRCTN27163214). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:957–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cancer incidence in India. Globocan 2018. http://www.gco.iarc.fr. Accessed 22 Dec 2018.
- 14.Raina V, Shukla NK, Rath GK, Gupta NP, Mishra MC, Chaterjee TK, et al. Clinical profile and problems of management of 108 cases of germ cell tumours of testis at Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi 1985–1990. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:573–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Horwich A, Sleijfer DT, Fossa SD, Kaye SB, Oliver RT, Cullen MH, et al. Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1844–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mann JR, Raafat F, Robinson K, Imeson J, Gornall P, Phillips M, et al. UKCCSG’s germ cell tumour (GCT) studies: improving outcome for children with malignant extracranial non-gonadal tumours–carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin are effective and less toxic than previous regimens. United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1998 Apr;30(4):217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Frazier AL, Stoneham S, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Dang H, Xia C, Olson TA, et al. Comparison of carboplatin versus cisplatin in the treatment of paediatric extracranial malignant germ cell tumours: a report of the Malignant Germ Cell International Consortium. Eur J Cancer. 2018;98:30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) Research Data (1973–2014), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2017, based on the November 2016 Submission.Google Scholar