Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 104–112 | Cite as

External Validation and Modification of the EDEMA Score for Predicting Malignant Brain Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke

  • Yajun Cheng
  • Simiao Wu
  • Yanan Wang
  • Quhong Song
  • Ruozhen Yuan
  • Qian Wu
  • Shuting Zhang
  • Shihong Zhang
  • Bo Wu
  • Ming LiuEmail author
Original Work

Abstract

Background

Accurate prediction of malignant brain edema (MBE) after stroke is paramount to facilitate close monitoring and timely surgical intervention. The Enhanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) score was useful to predict potentially lethal malignant edema in Western populations. We aimed to validate and modify it to achieve a better predictive value for MBE in Chinese patients.

Methods

Of ischemic stroke patients consecutively admitted in the Department of Neurology, West China Hospital between January 2010 and December 2017, we included patients with anterior circulation stroke, early signs of brain edema on computed tomography within 24 h of onset, and admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8. MBE was defined as the development of signs of herniation (including decrease in consciousness and/or anisocoria), accompanied by midline shift ≥ 5 mm on follow-up imaging. The EDEMA score consisted of five parameters: glucose, stroke history, reperfusion therapy, midline shift, and cistern effacement. We created a modified score by adding admission NIHSS score to the original EDEMA score. The discrimination of the score was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed by Hosmer–Lemeshow test and calibration plot. We compared the discrimination of the original and modified score by AUC, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Clinical usefulness of the two scores was compared by plotting net benefits at different threshold probabilities in the decision curve analysis.

Results

Of the 478 eligible patients (mean age 67.3 years; median NIHSS score 16), 93 (19%) developed MBE. The EDEMA score showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.76) and good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.77). The modified score showed an improved discriminative ability (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.76–0.84, P < 0.001; NRI 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.78, P < 0.001; IDI 0.07, 95% CI 0.06–0.09, P < 0.001). Decision curves showed that the modified score had a higher net benefit than the original score in a range of threshold probabilities lower than 60%.

Conclusions

The original EDEMA score showed an acceptable predictive value for MBE in Chinese patients. By adding the admission NIHSS score, the modified score allowed for a more accurate prediction and clinical usefulness. Further validation in large cohorts of different ethnicities is needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords

Stroke Edema Prediction Risk score Area under curve Decision curve analysis 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

YC developed the protocol, collected data, read the images, performed statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. SW helped develop the protocol, collected part of the data, read the images, revised the manuscript and polished the language. YW, QS, RY, QW collected part of the data, found some useful papers and provided helpful input on the theme. STZ, SHZ and BW helped build the idea, and offered available suggestions to write the manuscript. ML designed the study, supervised and offered guidance to all authors, revised the manuscript.

Source of Support

This study was supported by Key Research and Development Program, Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0007), Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China (81620108009), and National Key Research and Development Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFC1300500-505).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval/Informed consent

The study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Informed consent was obtained from all individual patients or guardians.

References

  1. 1.
    Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. “Malignant” middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huttner HB, Schwab S. Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:949–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balami JS, Chen R-L, Grunwald IQ, Buchan AM. Neurological complications of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White OB, Norris JW, Hachinski VC, Lewis A. Death in early stroke, causes and mechanisms. Stroke. 1979;10:743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torbey MT, Bosel J, Rhoney DH, Rincon F, Staykov D, Amar AP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of large hemispheric infarction: a statement for health care professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the German Society for Neuro-intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2015;22:146–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, et al. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bar M, Mikulik R, Skoloudik D, Czerny D, Lipina R, Sames M, et al. Decompressive surgery for malignant supratentorial infarction remains underutilized after guideline publication. J Neurol. 2011;258:1689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ong CJ, Gluckstein J, Laurido-Soto O, Yan Y, Dhar R, Lee JM. Enhanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) score: a risk prediction tool. Stroke. 2017;48:1969–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wijdicks EF, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly WT, et al. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:1222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim H, Jin ST, Kim YW, Kim SR, Park IS, Jo KW. Predictors of malignant brain edema in middle cerebral artery infarction observed on CT angiography. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:554–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dohmen C, Galldiks N, Bosche B, Kracht L, Graf R. The severity of ischemia determines and predicts malignant brain edema in patients with large middle cerebral artery infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krieger DW, Demchuk AM, Kasner SE, Jauss M, Hantson L. Early clinical and radiological predictors of fatal brain swelling in ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oppenheim C, Samson Y, Manai R, Lalam T, Vandamme X, Crozier S, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2000;31:2175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomalla G, Hartmann F, Juettler E, Singer OC, Lehnhardt FG, Kohrmann M, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by magnetic resonance imaging within 6 h of symptom onset: a prospective multicenter observational study. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dittrich R, Kloska SP, Fischer T, Nam E, Ritter MA, Seidensticker P, et al. Accuracy of perfusion-CT in predicting malignant middle cerebral artery brain infarction. J Neurol. 2008;255:896–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu S, Yuan R, Wang Y, Wei C, Zhang S, Yang X, et al. Early prediction of malignant brain edema after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2918–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frank JI, Schumm LP, Wroblewski K, Chyatte D, Rosengart AJ, Kordeck C, et al. Hemicraniectomy and durotomy upon deterioration from infarction-related swelling trial: randomized pilot clinical trial. Stroke. 2014;45:781–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:W1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lei C, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Y, Yang H, Wang D, et al. Totaled health risks in vascular events score predicts clinical outcomes in patients with cardioembolic and other subtypes of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014;45:1689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet. 1998;352:1245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wardlaw JM, Sellar R. A simple practical classification of cerebral infarcts on CT and its interobserver reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1933–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, D’Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27:112–57.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med. 2011;30:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26:565–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lim JX, Han JX, See AAQ, Lew VH, Chock WT, Ban VF, et al. External validation of hematoma expansion scores in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in an Asian patient cohort. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30:394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kasner SE, Demchuk AM, Berrouschot J, Schmutzhard E, Harms L, Verro P, et al. Predictors of fatal brain edema in massive hemispheric ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dohmen C, Bosche B, Graf R, Staub F, Kracht L, Sobesky J, et al. Prediction of malignant course in MCA infarction by PET and microdialysis. Stroke. 2003;34:2152–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burghaus L, Hilker R, Dohmen C, Bosche B, Winhuisen L, Galldiks N, et al. Early electroencephalography in acute ischemic stroke: prediction of a malignant course? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:45–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kauw F, Bennink E, de Jong HWAM, Kappelle LJ, Horsch AD, Velthuis BK, et al. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid volume as a predictor of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 2019;50:1437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shimoyama T, Kimura K, Uemura J, Yamashita S, Saji N, Shibazaki K, et al. The DASH score: a simple score to assess risk for development of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. J Neurol Sci. 2014;338:102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jo K, Bajgur SS, Kim H, Choi HA, Huh PW, Lee K. A simple prediction score system for malignant brain edema progression in large hemispheric infarction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Yahia AM, Mohammad Y, Uzun G, Suri MF, et al. Timing of neurologic deterioration in massive middle cerebral artery infarction: a multicenter review. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:272–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stolz E, Gerriets T, Babacan SS, Jauss M, Kraus J, Kaps M. Intracranial venous hemodynamics in patients with midline dislocation due to postischemic brain edema. Stroke. 2002;33:479–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kamran S, Salam A, Akhtar N, Alboudi A, Kamran K, Singh R, et al. Factors that can help select the timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant MCA stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2018;9:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thomalla GJ, Kucinski T, Schoder V, Fiehler J, Knab R, Zeumer H, et al. Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by early perfusion- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 2003;34:1892–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Muscari A, Faccioli L, Lega MV, Lorusso A, Trossello MP, Puddu GM, et al. Predicting cerebral edema in ischemic stroke patients. Neurol Sci. 2019;40:745–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rumalla K, Ottenhausen M, Kan P, Burkhardt J-K. Recent nationwide impact of mechanical thrombectomy on decompressive hemicraniectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:2133–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yajun Cheng
    • 1
  • Simiao Wu
    • 1
  • Yanan Wang
    • 1
  • Quhong Song
    • 1
  • Ruozhen Yuan
    • 1
  • Qian Wu
    • 1
  • Shuting Zhang
    • 1
  • Shihong Zhang
    • 1
  • Bo Wu
    • 1
  • Ming Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Neurology, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations