Advertisement

Burnout and Resilience Among Neurosciences Critical Care Unit Staff

  • Taylor E. PurvisEmail author
  • Neurocritical Care and Chaplaincy Study Group
  • Deanna Saylor
Brief Communication
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Preventing burnout and promoting resiliency are important for health professionals’ well-being and quality of patient care, as individuals with high levels of burnout are more likely to self-report suboptimal patient interactions. The purpose of this study was to characterize resiliency and burnout among health care professionals in the neurosciences critical care unit (NCCU) at a tertiary care center.

Methods

All NCCU clinical staff were invited to participate in a Qualtrics® electronic survey between November 2016 and August 2017. The survey assessed burnout using the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (aMBI) and resiliency using the ten-question Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10). Higher scores on each aMBI subsection (range 0–18) indicate higher levels of each characteristic; larger resiliency scores (range 0–40) indicate higher resiliency. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test and continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U test or independent samples t test.

Results

A total of 65 participants (65/70, 93%) were included in the final analysis. Of respondents, 49 (75%) were nurses, 49 (75%) were female, and mean age was 34 years. Median emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment scores were as follows: 8 (IQR 6–11), 3 (IQR 0–6), and 15 (IQR 13–16). High emotional exhaustion scores and high depersonalization scores were reported in 45% (n = 29) and 28% (n = 18) of participants, respectively. Longer time working in the NCCU (1–5 years vs. less than 1 year) was independently associated with higher emotional exhaustion scores (p = 0.012). When compared to agnostic/atheist backgrounds, Catholicism was independently associated with higher personal accomplishment scores (p = 0.026). The median resiliency score was 31 (IQR 28–36). Older age was independently associated with higher resiliency scores (p = 0.044).

Conclusions

This study is the first to characterize levels of burnout and resiliency among NCCU providers. A significant minority of participants reported high levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, with those working longer in the NCCU more likely to experience emotional exhaustion. Efforts to improve the current work environments to optimally support the emotional needs of staff are needed to allow care providers to thrive and to promote longevity among NCCU providers.

Keywords

Chaplain Critical care Neurological critical care Staff Nurses Physician Burnout Resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following members of the Neurocritical Care and Chaplaincy Study Group who aided in the design and implementation of this project: Brittany M. Powell, MDiv; Gail Biba, MSN, RN; Deena Conti, MS, RN-BC; Thomas Y. Crowe, MDiv, BCC; Heather Thomas, MBA; J. Ricardo Carhuapoma, MD; John C. Probasco, MD; and Paula Teague, DMin, MBA, BCC.

Author Contributions

TEP, NCCSG, and DS designed research; TEP performed research; TEP analyzed data; and TEP, NCCSG, and DS wrote the paper.

Source of Support

Partial research funding was provided through an American Academy of Neurology grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors TEP, NCCSG, and DS declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

Full ethical approval was not obtained for this study. Rather, the IRB granted an exemption for this study because no identifying information was collected about participants, and the survey administered was deemed to be of minimal risk to participants. Informed consent was not required by the IRB given the exempt nature of this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mol MMCV, Kompanje EJO, Benoit DD, Bakker J, Nijkamp MD. The prevalence of compassion fatigue and burnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peckham C. Medscape National Physician Burnout and Depression Report 2018 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 15]. https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2018-lifestyle-burnout-depression-6009235?faf=1.
  3. 3.
    Wong AVK, Olusanya O. Burnout and resilience in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. BJA Educ. 2017;17(10):334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riley MR, Mohr DC, Waddimba AC. The reliability and validity of three-item screening measures for burnout: evidence from group-employed health care practitioners in upstate New York. Stress Health. 2018;34(1):187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lebares CC, Guvva EV, Ascher NL, O’Sullivan PS, Harris HW, Epel ES. Burnout and stress among US surgery residents: psychological distress and resilience. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(1):80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scali J, Gandubert C, Ritchie K, et al. Measuring resilience in adult women using the 10-items Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): role of trauma exposure and anxiety disorders. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuiper H, van Leeuwen CCM, Stolwijk-Swüste JM, Post MWM. Measuring resilience with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): which version to choose? Spinal Cord. 2019;57(5):360–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ehrich J, Mornane A, Powern T. Psychometric validation of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. J Appl Meas. 2017;18(2):122–36.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaufeli WB. Burnout in health care. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety 2007. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aytekin A, Yilmaz F, Kuguoglu S. Burnout levels in neonatal intensive care nurses and its effects on their quality of life. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2013;31:39–47.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galván ME, Vassallo JC, Rodríguez SP, et al. Professional burnout in pediatric intensive care units in Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2012;110:466–73.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sull A, Harland N, Moore A. Resilience of health-care workers in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mealer M, Jones J, Newman J, et al. The presence of resilience is associated with a healthier psychological profile in intensive care unit (ICU) nurses: results of a national survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:292–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ayala E, Carnero AM. Determinants of burnout in acute and critical care military nursing personnel: a cross-sectional study from Peru. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duijts SF, Kant I, van den Brandt PA, Swaen GM. Effectiveness of a preventive coaching intervention for employees at risk for sickness absence due to psychosocial health complaints: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(7):765–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    West CP, Dyrbye LN, Rabatin JT. Intervention to promote physician well-being, job satisfaction, and professionalism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(4):527–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations