Response to Rady re: Religion and Neuroscience
- 57 Downloads
I appreciate Rady’s interest in my recent article, “A survey of multidenominational rabbis on death by neurologic criteria,” which discussed rabbinical perspectives on brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) . Although a 2015 survey of neurologists demonstrated that 36% of objections to declaration of BD/DNC are based on religious beliefs that BD/DNC is not true death, there was no empirical data on the perspectives of religious leaders on BD/DNC before this survey of rabbis . Like Rady, I believe that it would be beneficial to explore the perspectives of other religious groups in a similar manner; to this end, I am currently surveying Muslims in healthcare and hospital chaplains about their views on BD/DNC.
I agree with Rady’s assertion that, “many religions demand unequivocal and infallible biologic criteria for determining the occurrence of death with certainty;” I don’t think anyone could, or would, make the argument that it is ever acceptable to declare a person...
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Lewis A. A survey of multidenominational rabbis on death by neurologic criteria. Neurocrit Care. 2019;Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
- 7.Fara MG, Chancellor B, Lord AS, Lewis A. Controversies in cardiopulmonary death. J Clin Ethics [Internet]. 2017;28:97–101.Google Scholar
- 8.Merriam-Webster.com. 2019.Google Scholar