Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 523–524 | Cite as

Response to Machado et al. re: Jahi McMath

  • Ariane Lewis
Letter to the Editor
  • 97 Downloads

Notes

Source of support

None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis A. Reconciling the case of Jahi McMath. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29:20–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Machado C, Estevez M, DeFina P, Leisman G. Response to Lewis A. reconciling the case of Jahi McMath. Neurocrit Care. 2018. Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis A, Bernat JL, Blosser S, et al. An interdisciplinary response to contemporary concerns about brain death determination. Neurology. 2018;90:423–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, Mysore M, Committee for Determination of Brain Death in Infants and Children. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations-executive summary. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:573–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wijdicks EFM, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74:1911–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greer D, Wu O. Neuroimaging in cardiac arrest prognostication. Semin Neurol. 2017;37:066–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and NeurosurgeryNYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations