Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 521–522 | Cite as

Response to Lewis A: Reconciling the Case of Jahi Mcmath

  • Calixto Machado
  • Mario Estévez
  • Phillip A. DeFina
  • Gerry Leisman
Letter to the Editor
  • 153 Downloads

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

Dr. Calixto Machado contributed to original idea, writing, discussion and also first and corresponding author. Dr. Mario Estevez, Dr. Phillip A. DeFina, Dr. Gerry Leisman contributed to reviewing and discussion.

Source of support

Authors have not received any support for this article.

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis A. Reconciling the case of Jahi McMath. Neurocrit Care. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0561-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Machado C, DeFina PA, Estevez M, et al. A reason for care in the clinical evaluation of function on the spectrum of Consciousness. Funct Neurol Rehabil Ergon. 2017;7:43–53.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shewmon AD. Truly reconciling the case of Jahi McMath. Neurocrit Care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0593-x.
  4. 4.
    Wijdicks EF. Determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 1995;45:1003–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Special Task Force. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in children. Pediatrics. 1987;80:293–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Calixto Machado
    • 1
  • Mario Estévez
    • 1
  • Phillip A. DeFina
    • 2
  • Gerry Leisman
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Neurology and NeurosurgeryHavanaCuba
  2. 2.International Brain Research FoundationFlandersUSA
  3. 3.The National Institute for Brain and Rehabilitation SciencesNazarethIsrael

Personalised recommendations